Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! |
||
Criminal Complaint Against Vaccine Manufacturers, in Particular BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH – Information on the Status of PreparationsMore than 250 affected individuals and bereaved relatives intend to file a criminal complaint: Lawyers see an initial suspicion of serious bodily injury offenses and fraud in connection with certain vaccine batches. Developers, production managers, and quality managers are in focus – while the legal battle in court is becoming increasingly intense. 
Information on the Status of Preparations for the Criminal ComplaintIn addition to claims for damages and compensation for pain and suffering against the vaccine manufacturers, in particular BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH and the respective federal state, which act as representatives for the physicians, we also see personal responsibility on the part of individual actors,- who were responsible for the development of Comirnaty - who were responsible for converting production to Process2 - who were responsible as production managers - who were responsible as quality managers - who bore responsibility in batch testing and who were responsible for pharmacovigilance, such that criminal liability must also be considered with regard to these individuals. We have therefore examined the elements of a number of different qualified bodily injury offenses and have come to the conclusion that there may be an initial suspicion. To illustrate this particularly clearly, batches for which contamination with pDNA and SV40 has already been detected are especially suitable. These are the batches EX8679, FE6975, and FD7958. According to its own statements, the Paul Ehrlich Institute has received more than 28,000 completed forms from doctors and patients reporting suspected cases relating to these three batches alone. Compared to almost all other batches, this is an exorbitantly higher number. Furthermore, we also examined the possibility of commercial fraud due to the claim of an incorrect therapeutic benefit without the necessary evidence. This circumstance not only caused vaccinated individuals to be misled about the degree and existence of infection protection and transmission protection, but this misconception also influenced the purchasers, as it led to the introduction of the facility-based proof requirement and the obligation to tolerate vaccination within the Bundeswehr, solely based on the supposed protection of others presented to the public, which remained unproven. Since the meeting of the Enquete Commission on December 15, 2025, we know from Jens Spahn that all vaccine manufacturers and he himself were aware that it was never a vaccine intended to create infection protection and transmission protection, but rather that it was meant only as a medication for the treatment of COVID-19 to prevent severe courses of the disease. However, in 2021, during the relevant period of administration, this was not communicated to the population. In addition to infection protection, transmission protection and thus public solidarity were invoked through the introduction of the 3G measures (Hamburg even 2G), despite full knowledge that there was no evidence for this, in order to support sales. As a result, a total of ten times the necessary quantity was ordered from the vaccine manufacturers. All of these orders would have been impossible if Mr. Spahn had done in 2021 what he stated in the Enquete Commission—that he should have calmly explained that although it was not a protective vaccine, according to the manufacturer’s claim it might alleviate the course of the disease after the outbreak of illness. If the product had been classified purely as a medication, it would have had to undergo a far more complex approval procedure; therefore, the decision was made to carry out a “mislabeling” in order to gain access through a simplified approval process. This was only possible if the manufacturer, for example BioNTech, relabeled the product that was listed as OEB5 “highly toxic from 1 microgram” in the safety data sheet. The examination of this complex also leads to the conclusion that an initial suspicion must be affirmed. On this basis, a criminal complaint was therefore prepared, because in the Contergan scandal it was only the criminal proceedings and the offender–victim settlement reached there that led to the establishment of a compensation fund. The hearings yesterday at the Higher Regional Court of Koblenz also showed that the senate made it clear to everyone present that proceedings with the Higher Regional Court of Koblenz will be a very long and difficult road. In the meantime, slightly more than 250 affected individuals and bereaved relatives have come forward who wish to file a criminal complaint for themselves or for their deceased relatives. However, the mere wish to do so is not sufficient, as each person must submit at least a detailed witness statement titled “Witness Statement,” describing the health condition prior to vaccination with one of the disputed batches, and a chronological account of the condition after the vaccination. It is also important that this witness statement includes the place, date, and signature. Only this witness statement together with the vaccination record leads to the result that the individuals can become witnesses for one another in the other criminal proceedings. If charges are brought, there will be many new possibilities for increasing the pressure. The background of the above statements is not that the criminal liability of any perpetrator would directly benefit anyone, but rather that appropriate compensation within the framework of an offender–victim settlement might. We have genuinely tried the civil law route for nearly five years. However, the reaction of the Higher Regional Court of Koblenz in the “home game” of BioNTech shows that everything will be done to prevent any of the affected individuals from receiving compensation. The Federal Court of Justice had built a bridge through the right to information, which is nothing other than the codified secondary burden of presentation of the vaccine manufacturer, which would have existed even if Section 84a of the German Medicines Act were completely disregarded. Only via procedural fictions under Section 138(2) and (3) of the German Code of Civil Procedure would it be possible to decide the matter in favor of the affected parties without taking evidence on the merits. For the senate in Koblenz, however, there is no civil procedural sanction whatsoever for injured parties if the obligation to provide information is violated—this was the senate’s declared provisional legal view yesterday. In plain terms, the other Higher Regional Courts will once again copy the pharmaceutical-friendly line of the Koblenz court, and the years will pass again. Many affected individuals are tired of the stonewalling: no information, no legally compliant pharmacovigilance, and a tightly closed block of politics and the pharmaceutical industry united against the injured parties, showing no willingness to acknowledge that restoring legal peace could be a valuable goal. Thus, this escalation remains the only option in order to reveal once again how far the right of justice ministers to issue instructions extends into the public prosecutor’s offices, or whether prosecutors are actually allowed to pursue reported matters effectively. Even in the CumEx affair, the chief public prosecutor resigned, because whenever the direct interests of superiors are involved, the rule of law ceases to function—since there is no public prosecutor’s office for organized large-scale crime that is completely free from instructions. Further information at https://ru.law/schadenstraechtige-chargennummern/
Author: AI-Translation - Rechtsanwalt Tobias Ulbrich | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Drawing Attention to Problems - The Citizens’ VoiceNo, this is not self-praise – or is it?... zum Artikel |
 | Small Group, Important Message: Palestinian Woman at Peace Demonstration in Weißenfels on July 15, 2024The Failure of NATO as a "Peace Alliance" and the True Costs of Global Conflicts, Moving Words from a Young Palestinian Woman Reporting on the Stateless Existence and Often Forgott... zum Artikel |
 | The Best Absurdistan Ever! – Can a Trans Woman Be Far-Right?Welcome to Absurdistan, the land where logic, common sense, and even the most basic expectations of rationality have taken a vacation. And who could illustrate this absurd reality ... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |