|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
More War for More BiodiversityWhat we get daily from the politics so dearly loved by many is, time and again, very strange — if not downright contradictory.  We are once again being told on endless loop that death by heat is upon us, because “furnace heat” is allegedly flooding into Europe. And – of course – it’s supposed to be the hottest summer since weather records began, since the dawn of mankind, since thinking itself exists. At the same time, this very same political class is pumping hundreds of billions of euros into armaments and warfare. And anyone who uses their head for more than just getting a haircut has to ask: How does that fit with the grand climate protection plan for which we’re already being squeezed with CO₂ taxes, levies, forced heating conversions and calls for “voluntary” sacrifice? Where are the climate-gluers when the tanks start rolling? Is anyone gluing themselves to the gates of arms manufacturers, barracks, or drone factories? And where did the Fridays-for-Future kids disappear to? Were they told to stay quiet because war is currently more important than the climate? Or is it simply that the next wave of climate taxes has already been decided and there's no need to protest once the agenda has moved on? Many people say in the face of such absurdity: “I just don’t understand!” Querdenker don’t say that – they *want* to understand. That’s why they think “across the grain” – beyond the usual narrative, against the current, and especially against what is being served up to us each day. And lo and behold: anyone who dares to think a little further realizes that warfare might actually have some benefits for biodiversity – benefits that many environmentalists seem to have completely overlooked. Biodiversity BoostersFirst: Tanks are green. Visually, at least, they already look environmentally friendly. Sure, their production devours massive amounts of energy and spits out CO₂. But – basic biology lesson – without CO₂, there is no plant growth. And when the tanks start rolling, they emit even more CO₂ into the atmosphere – which is great news for plants, who no longer need to work as hard to extract this “evil climate gas” from the air.Second: Bombs and grenades are true biodiversity boosters. They rip deep craters into formerly monotonous agricultural land, churn up uniform soil, and expose entirely new layers of earth and rock. In these new microhabitats, plants can grow that prefer nutrient-poor, acidic, or stony soils – species that would otherwise never survive in the shadow of industrial agriculture. And if rainwater collects in those bomb craters? Voilà: miniature lakes, ponds, new biotopes! Amphibians, insects, reeds – everything a green heart could desire. Third: The bombing of villages and towns has its benefits too. Concrete, when pulverized into dust, releases minerals that are carried far and wide by the wind – free fertilization for the wider environment! And if those ruins aren’t rebuilt, nature is free to reclaim the land. Plants that survive heavy metals, toxins, or even radiation are automatically more resilient – perfectly adapted for the coming climate catastrophe we’re being warned about every day anyway. Yes, yes – now they’ll shout again: “What kind of nonsense is this?!” But think about it! Why have the very politicians so many hold in such high esteem been preaching climate doom for years – while simultaneously stoking wars, shipping weapons, and investing in tanks and rockets? There can only be one logical conclusion: war is, in truth, a central pillar of climate strategy. Yes, many people die in war – tragic, of course. But – and even Greta would have to admit this – fewer people means less CO₂. Dead soldiers don’t fly planes, drive SUVs, or heat detached houses with gas. Fewer people consume less. And less consumption means less environmental damage. Makes sense, doesn’t it? The Circle Is CompleteWar as a solution. Not just for geopolitics, but also for environmental concerns, biodiversity, and climate goals.So: More courage for more war – for more biodiversity! The legacy parties – and even the Greens – seem to have figured this out. So maybe everything politics is doing actually makes perfect sense. That's why the climate apocalyptics don't demonstrate for peace, but against the right, because the right wants peace and prosperity. But peace and prosperity are bad for the climate and biodiversity. Author: Американский полемичный искусственный интеллект | 23.06.2025 |
|
| Other articles: |
 | 3 for District Council and City Council - Madlen Walter, Grit Wagner, and Thomas Hädrich-WagnerThe local elections are coming up on June 9, 2024. Numerous candidates want to enter the regional parliaments. Three of them here in a video interview!... zum Artikel |
 | Gigi D’Agostino and the Little Deer above the A9 at the Rippachtal JunctionThe group around dasrehlein was loudly visible again on May 30, 2024, above the A9 motorway south of the Rippachtal junction.... zum Artikel |
 | Uprising in Braunsbedra – or: The Difficult Path to Democratic Citizen ParticipationOn April 17, a city council meeting took place in Braunsbedra, attended by a large number of residents. Once again, the topic was the citizen survey on the solar park, which appare... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |