|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact Deutsch English Français Español | ||
|
Whoever calls others "public enemy" is a ...?The tone is getting harsher among those who like to adorn themselves with rainbow colors and consider themselves tolerant. 
Thus, pioneers of that tolerance-driven scene, which locates itself in the left and green spectrum, publicly throw around terms on Facebook that would make a true democrat shudder. They fear what they consider deadly CO₂ and demand electric cars, preferably from China. However, they no longer like Teslas because they cannot stand Elon Musk. The decline of the German and European automotive industry and the resulting job losses are acceptable to them. Price increases due to additional CO₂ taxes and levies are justified in their eyes because the climate is more important to them than food on other people’s tables. They attend and promote demonstrations against the right-wing. For them, the CDU is now considered right-wing—unless criticism is directed at local CDU politicians. Then they defend those politicians, just as they generally defend the ruling parties. Sometimes it is claimed that they are in contact with regional politicians. Criticism of their beloved politicians is seen by them as hate and agitation, which they respond to with hate and agitation. Objectivity is a foreign concept to them, although they believe their insults, which they hurl around at every opportunity, to be objective. Outstanding in this regard is still Christian Pagel. Articles from the Bürgerstimme are for him "intellectual garbage of a cognitively maximally limited exemplary subject," and he repeatedly uses words like "loser" or "lateral thinker sect clown." Important terms for him are "destruction," "annihilation," and "downfall" in connection with critics of the government. But he is not the only one presenting himself as a champion of tolerance in rainbow colors. For example, Nikola Neumann calls someone a "little brown bunny" if they post a link to an article stating that the federal government will continue to allow Afghan entry after the federal election. Three very brave ones are Jens Rothe, Marcus Runge, and Andreas Gerhard Feustel – these tolerance activists have repeatedly called me a "public enemy." How should such people be classified?People who call others "public enemy" and rely on insults and degradation instead of factual arguments clearly operate within the extremist and misanthropic spectrum. Such terms originate from the language of totalitarian ideologies, especially National Socialism, and serve to dehumanize and exclude dissenters.Classification of such people: Ideologically entrenched extremists – Those who deliberately use such terms often consciously adopt the language of totalitarian regimes. – These individuals see themselves as part of a "pure" or "better" collective and devalue anyone who does not fit their worldview. Authoritarian personalities – People with authoritarian tendencies tend to strictly distinguish between "us" and "them." – They look for clear enemies to stabilize their worldview. Demagogically influenced followers – Some people adopt such terms from their environment or propagandistic media without critical reflection. – They repeat extremist rhetoric because they hope it offers belonging or simple explanations for complex problems. People with aggressive or narcissistic behavior – Persons who regularly insult and degrade others often have narcissistic or aggressive personality traits. – Their goal is not the exchange of arguments but dominance over others. Conclusion: Those who use defamation instead of arguments do not want to debate but to divide and intimidate. Terms like "public enemy" have a clear historical burden and indicate that someone is deeply rooted in a radical, authoritarian, or misanthropic mindset. Seriously involving such persons in democratic discourse is usually pointless – it is more about exposing their ideology and limiting their influence on others. Where is the distancing from such contemporaries?Those in the left-green spectrum repeatedly demand vehemently that one must distance oneself from misanthropic extremists. So far, I have not read such distancing under the posts of the above-mentioned contemporaries. Should I assume that such Nazi-speak is tolerated by the self-proclaimed tolerant? But what does that say about these so-called tolerant people themselves?Author: AI-Translation - Michael Thurm | 21.02.2025 |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Murder, Elixirs - and a Cake with a Deadly FillingWhat happens when a casual conversation about poison and neighbors suddenly turns into a dark tale of poverty, despair, and child murder?... zum Artikel |
 | The Peace Protesters and the Schizophrenia of the WarmongersOn March 19, 2025, a rally under the slogan "Weapons for billions do not create peace!" will take place at 5:00 PM at the market in Weißenfels.... zum Artikel |
 | The Dream of Winning the Lottery – A Medieval PerspectiveEven in the Middle Ages, life was a tough mix of farming, plague, and a constant fear that your neighbor might accuse you of witchcraft just because you didn’t have diarrhea for ... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |