|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact Deutsch | ||
|
Anti-Democracy Movement Still Running Amok in Burgenlandkreis?The group from the Lützen area had registered their "Bridge Lighting" for November 14, 2024, from 6 p.m. to about 9 p.m. on the highway bridge over the A9 / Am Heerweg in 06686 Lützen and then received a set of conditions. 
This set of conditions extends over eight pages. The Legal and Regulatory Office is very keen to allow even such a demonstration against government policy to take place only if the government critics comply with – and one can certainly call it that – arbitrarily imposed rules. Part of these conditions obviously still comes from the times of the Corona protests and was simply carried over. For example, it is still demanded that the protesters provide marshals. There is no legal basis for this. But apparently, nobody at the Legal and Regulatory Office cares about that anymore. What’s interesting is that it is required the assembly leader or their deputy must be present at all times. In Aschersleben last Monday, the demonstrators demanded to speak with the police commander because they wanted to conduct a walk that the police forbade. However, the commander refused to come to the scene. The well-known double standards we repeatedly witness. The order states: The use of the signs “Z” and “V”, black and orange striped “Saint George’s Ribbons”, flags and coats of arms of the Soviet Union, the people’s republics of Luhansk, Donetsk, and Crimea are prohibited. I don’t know what problems people in Germany have with the Saint George’s Ribbon. According to Wikipedia, the Saint George’s Ribbon has been the most important symbol in Russia since 2005 for remembering the victory in the German-Soviet war — i.e., the victory over Nazi Germany. Does Burgenlandkreis not want to see such a remembrance? In principle, the Saint George’s Ribbon is not banned. The organizer of the bridge lighting wrote in the registration: The reason for the assembly is protest against the current policies of the federal government. The assembly participates in the nationwide called Bridge Lighting as part of the farmers’ protests. Why the use of the signs “Z” and “V” as well as the flags of the people’s republics Luhansk, Donetsk, and Crimea is explicitly prohibited is beyond me. Or is there some kind of Russophobia in the district administration? The order also states: Any demonstration materials as well as emblems and tattoos must not contain any punishable, youth-endangering, or administrative offense content. It seems they assume that the drivers passing under the bridge have eagle eyes and the ability to see tattoos on demonstrators in the dark at speeds of 80 km/h or more. Furthermore, it seems the assembly leader is expected to be transformed into a policeman, controlling and monitoring that no participants commit any punishable acts or administrative offenses. That’s how fast you get promoted to civil servant – without training or exams. Great! What pay grade does the assembly leader get? Does Burgenlandkreis pay pension and other social security contributions for the assembly leader? Just asking! New is that “yellow revolving beacons” are not allowed. Until now, no one cared. This is supposedly based on the Road Traffic Licensing Regulations (StVZO), without naming the exact paragraph. The demonstrators are left in the dark about which legal regulation actually applies. Legally, one might argue this lacks the necessary justification. The demonstrators might still have to take a crash course in law and dig through the statutes themselves. Probably §52 StVZO is meant. This regulates which additional headlights and lights on vehicles may be present or used. But the demonstrators can’t know this for sure. But what about §38 StVO (not to be confused with StVZO)? About yellow blinking lights (not revolving beacons), paragraph 3 states: “Yellow blinking lights warn of danger. They may be used fixed in place or on vehicles. Use on vehicles is only permitted to warn of work or accident sites, unusually slow vehicles, or vehicles with unusual width or length or unusually wide or long loads.” Such things always leave room for interpretation. Government policy can certainly be seen as a danger. The vehicles stand on the bridge and also take up space there. Also, demonstrators move around the vehicles. One could therefore interpret that yellow blinking lights on the vehicles are justified. By phone, the organizer was told that yellow revolving beacons not attached to vehicles are permitted. So, if demonstrators place “yellow revolving beacons” around the vehicles, that’s okay. Whether this is logical, everyone can decide for themselves. I would say the Legal and Regulatory Office digs deep into the laws just to find some minor detail they can blame the demonstrators for afterward. Surely always with the aim of suppressing demonstrations through such nitpicking and harassment. Furthermore, the order states that the assembly leader must inform the participants of the bolded conditions. But why not all conditions? My view remains that the authority issuing a decree is also responsible for its announcement. I would refer to § 37 VwVfG, § 41 VwVfG, and § 43 VwVfG. So far, the order has only been transmitted to the organizer, explicitly addressed only to them, and delivered only to them. However, the order also concerns all other demonstration participants. The organizer, however, is not an employee of the authority. Or may the organizer invoice their services to the authority? Or is the organizer at the same time a policeman and an employee of the authority during the demonstration? Just asking! As a precaution, the Legal and Regulatory Office has excluded the suspensive effect that would arise from an objection from the outset. They fear that the demonstration could cause a disturbance of security and believe that security can only be ensured by the restrictions in the order. But who monitors compliance with the conditions? Oh, I forgot, that’s the job of the new employee of the police and the Legal and Regulatory Office: the assembly leader. What pay grade did he get? Is it allowed to demonstrate against the government?Of course! But only under conditions imposed by the employees of the “anti-democracy movement” — sorry! — of the Legal and Regulatory Office — which clearly aim to ruin the demonstration. Every little thing is watched closely to see if maybe one of these government critics might have done something that violates a law, so a fine can be imposed immediately.I’m curious when the Legal and Regulatory Office will issue conditions about what socks and underwear are allowed or must be worn at demonstrations. This must be the freedom and democracy that the Legal and Regulatory Office defends on behalf of the district administrator.Finally, I want to quote the district administrator, Götz Ulrich, beloved by many, who said in the district council on March 11, 2024: We all know who used such instruments of intimidation, repression, and threat, and where such things can lead... But as a Christian person, I firmly believe that you and your accomplices will one day be held accountable. Until that time comes, I tell you: I will withstand these Nazi methods and continue to stand with all my might for the free democratic basic order wherever it becomes necessary. Is that so? Just asking! Author: AI-Translation - Michael Thurm | 13.11.2024 |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Ist der Burgenlandkreis, unser Bundesland, die Bundesrepublik Deutschland totalitär?Kritiker würden diese Frage ganz klar mit Ja beantworten. Doch was denken Nicht-Kritiker? Auf der Website der Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung wird Totalitarismus beschriebe... zum Artikel |
 | The Alliance for Diversity and Democracy and the Overland Convoy in ZeitzOn February 22, 2025, at 3 PM, a rally of the Alliance for Diversity and Democracy Zeitz began at the Altmarkt in Zeitz, attended by about 20 local citizens and around 100 people f... zum Artikel |
 | Wie schnell ist eigentlich die Feuerwehr?Das könnte fast eine „Frag-doch-mal-die-Maus“-Frage sein, aber ich habe da mal einfach geschaut.... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |