Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
Inhumane vaccine injury denier - CDU district administrator Götz Ulrich refuses to answer Corona question in the district councilThe last district council meeting on 29/06/2026 once again showed how the district administrator Götz Ulrich (CDU), who is loved by many, is actually positioned towards citizens - in my view, in an inhumane way. Unanswered questions in the district councilI took the liberty of reminding and urging during the citizens’ question period of the district council meeting that my question from the last district council meeting had not been answered. I had asked why it was so important for the district administrator that the people in the Burgenland district had to take part in testing these so-called Corona vaccines and why he disregarded the Nuremberg Code.A letter was indeed received with a lot of rambling from the deputy district administrator, Dr. Ariane Körner, but this very question was not answered. Instead, the letter stated that people were “consumers” of the vaccines and that the district, including the district administrator, had no interest whatsoever in how many people suffered damage from this so-called vaccination. So I asked again. The district administrator’s brief answerThe answer from the CDU district administrator, who is loved by many, was short and concise:I refer to the letter you received. It was also not a testing of the vaccines, but the use of the vaccines. Moreover, the letter is the answer. If you do not agree with it, I cannot change that, but you do not have the right to receive the answer you want.I explained again that this question was not answered in the letter from Dr. Ariane Körner. The district council chairman and apparent “district administrator protection officer” Andy Haugk (close to the CDU) then intervened and asked whether I had a supplementary question. The district administrator Götz Ulrich (CDU), who is loved by many, did not make any further statement. He therefore did not want to help ensure that the question asked was answered. Criticism of handling and accountabilityThis manner once again shows that the district administrator is apparently not concerned with the well-being and health of the people in the Burgenland district. Those who remember know that every positive Corona test was meticulously recorded and reported in order to generate incidence rates to portray an alleged danger of the coronavirus. Likewise, the number of “vaccinations” administered was carefully recorded. People who suffered harm or even death as a result of the vaccination were, in turn, not recorded by the district. They are supposed to contact the Paul Ehrlich Institute or the manufacturer of these so-called vaccines. In short: The district administrator is not interested at all!The CDU district administrator Götz Ulrich, who is loved by many, states that the so-called vaccines were not tested but used. The question arises: Used for what? Used for testing? Statements at federal level and open questionsThe former Federal Minister of Health Jens Spahn (CDU) stated in the Bundestag commission of inquiry on 15/12/2025 that, on the one hand, it was never the goal of vaccine development to provide transmission protection, and on the other hand that the vaccines are still being tested on the market - i.e., in people. This raises the next question for the district administrator: Why has he not yet taken this into account?It should also be recalled that in the digital press conference on 04/11/2021, the district medical officer Dr. Treu stated that the vaccination would only protect against a severe course of the disease. The district administrator did not appear at this press conference as if this information was new to him. This should have been a signal for the district administrator to question this so-called vaccination and also to stop any vaccination campaign. Because there is no legal basis under which the state may coerce people into protecting themselves through such invasive and experimental measures. Corona outbreak in nursing homesInterestingly, this digital press conference from 04/11/2021 discusses a Corona outbreak in a nursing home in Weißenfels. It is heard that the residents in this home who were willing to be vaccinated had already received their third “vaccination” - including a deceased resident. It is said that almost all homes were supplied with “vaccination offers.” It was reported that vaccination status was recorded in such outbreak situations. Of the 8 “infected employees,” 7 were vaccinated. Of the 14 affected residents, 11 were vaccinated. According to Dr. Treu, the vaccination rate was very high.District administrator Ulrich stated at the time: “My goal is actually not to deviate too much from the state-wide rules and to make decisions as uniformly as possible with colleagues in neighboring districts.” He therefore did not really consider an independent assessment. He apparently does not do so today either, in order not to deviate from the Corona narrative. Calls for transparencyIt has recently been reported on https://multipolar-magazin.de/artikel/wir-muessen-druck-aufbauen that a large number of people are demanding disclosure of the data from the approval of the so-called vaccines at the EMA (European Medicines Agency). As many additional people as possible are encouraged to join.The initiative criticizes in particular that approval was not based on the strict control requirements for gene therapeutics, although this corresponds to the “actual biological mechanism of action” of the preparations. Specifically, it demands the disclosure of all relevant documents “concerning manufacturing, quality control, batch testing, residual DNA, RNA quality, impurities, biodistribution, as well as non-clinical and clinical safety.”The EMA refuses to disclose such documents. This suggests that there is something to hide in order to prevent those responsible from being held accountable. The article states that national authorities hide behind the EMA. CDU district administrator Götz Ulrich is apparently among those who hide in this regard without a doubt. But this repeatedly proves that he is not concerned with the well-being and health of the people at all. Unfulfilled commitments in the district councilIn the district council meeting on 29/06/2026, Andreas Karl (Heimat) called on the district administrator to submit the final documents of the Corona expert commission of Saxony-Anhalt. Ulrich had promised in the district council meeting in January 2026 to provide these to the district council members. This has not yet been done.Author: AI-Translation - АИИ | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | A Trail into the Hidden: What Reese Knows This Time...Sunday. Supposed to be a day of rest. But not for Reese and Ërnst. Because as soon as the sun rises over Weißenfels, things start simmering in the background. What begins as a ca... zum Artikel |
 | Black-Green Meeting in the Burgenland District – Optimism Versus FirewallAs part of his summer tour, Felix Banaszak (Greens) stopped at the Monastery of St. Claren in Weißenfels on August 5, 2025.... zum Artikel |
 | Jüdenstraße in Weißenfels to Become a Living Museum?Weißenfels is making an effort. Really. The once-bustling Jüdenstraße, formerly the vibrant heart of the shopping scene in the former district capital, is now being visually rev... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |