|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
District Administrator Götz Ulrich Seeks "Protection" from Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser - Who Protects Government Critics?On April 23, District Administrator Götz Ulrich (CDU) traveled to a meeting with Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser (SPD). The topic was the personal insults, threats, and attacks against municipal officeholders and elected officials. According to the post on Facebook, this meeting discussed proposals from the "Alliance for the Protection of Municipal Officeholders and Elected Officials" for measures to protect against hate, incitement, threats, hostility, and attacks, such as measures to increase appreciation for municipal politics, strengthen political education, and establish a central contact point for threatened officeholders and elected officials. 
Nancy Faeser is the federal minister who has in mind the end of the presumption of innocence and the introduction of the reversal of the burden of proof. In a democratic rule-of-law state, it is the case that "the state" must prove the guilt of an accused person. Mrs. Faeser wants the accused to have to prove their innocence. This was illustrated in the case of the President of the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Arne Schönbohm, who was dismissed by the federal interior minister based on a media report. Years later, it turned out there was nothing to the allegations. Nevertheless, Schönbohm lost his job. A similar situation applied to CDU members who were present at the "secret meeting" in Potsdam. Expulsion proceedings were initiated, and the city of Cologne dismissed Simone Baum. That what Correctiv claimed to have uncovered was, in many respects, based on assumptions and suggestions apparently played no role. In Article 3, Paragraph 3 of the German Constitution, it states: "No one may be prejudiced or favored because of … their political opinions." Dismissals or even prejudgments based on certain claims should therefore be unconstitutional. Well, the Constitution. If the political opinion doesn’t fit, discrimination occurs. Even from Christians, who supposedly hold neighborly love dear: The Evangelical Church no longer wants to award certain positions to AfD members. Another action by the federal interior minister was the "Democracy Promotion Act," which might better have been called the "Government Protection Act." The gist was: "Those who mock the state must deal with a strong state." This law ultimately failed to be passed. The Scientific Service had doubted its constitutionality. But merely coming up with the idea for such a law raises many questions. What has come into force is the reform of disciplinary law to "remove extremists from public service more quickly." This affects only very few individuals, but proceedings can now be expedited through a disciplinary order. Certainly similar to the cases above. A mere allegation is likely sufficient to get rid of unwanted employees. This should send a clear signal to all administrative staff to hold back on criticism. Nowadays, one is quickly labeled an "extremist." Overall, it is evident among the parties in government (including the CDU) that it’s about combating critics in general. This is often cloaked as a fight against disinformation and the right, even though information that is actually true but could pose problems for the government is also to be combated. This can be inferred from statements coming from the Greens. There should only be one truth—the government’s. In Berlin, there is apparently already a reporting register to report expressions of opinion "below the threshold of criminality". Anyone can denounce others. This recalls times gone by. The CDU leader in Thuringia, Mario Voigt, a party colleague of District Administrator Götz Ulrich, recently stated that a "social media license for every user" should be necessary, and freedom of speech should only exist with real names. This is understandable, as it makes it easier to get hold of "inciters." During the Corona demonstrations, Nancy Faeser came up with the phrase "One can express their opinion without gathering in many places at once." A very peculiar understanding of democracy from someone who sets out to defend it. She labels critics as a personified threat to our democracy. More and more absolutely anti-democratic, totalitarian tendencies are becoming apparent. When you add how critics of Corona measures are still being treated, while other offenders get off with relatively mild penalties, it paints the picture of a political caste solely concerned with its own protection. District Administrator Götz Ulrich seems to align himself with this group as he seeks protection from Nancy Faeser. Although he recognizes that federal policy must act more considerately and not make promises that cannot be implemented at the municipal level due to lack of funds and personnel, he focuses on the involvement and consultation of municipal peak associations in new projects. However, hate and incitement must be effectively countered. Shouldn’t a district administrator who considers himself a democrat distance himself from such anti-democratic endeavors? Who Protects the Critics?There are still fake profiles under my name on Facebook spreading nonsense, disinformation, and lies. The "Bürgerstimme BLK" profile on Facebook, which adorns itself with the coat of arms of Saxony-Anhalt, still exists. This profile incites against the opposition and also critics in the Burgenland district. Why is there no protection against this? After the demonstration in Zeitz on May 1, 2024, what I consider to be the stalker, Christian Pagel, was in "top form." He posted pictures of me filming this demo. With what obsession he must have searched the internet for pictures and live videos of the demo to find images of me—somehow creepy and, in my view, tending toward pathological. I don’t know how psychologists would diagnose this. He also justifies it incoherently. I had pointed out that the focus should be on the content of the demo. He claimed that what the speakers said wasn’t relevant. What was relevant, however, was me, because I film and publish it online. Action must be taken against this publishing, he said. He thus acts in line with Nancy Faeser’s view, where demonstrating is allowed but preferably in a way that no one notices. The Burgenland district’s orders regarding the car convoys, specifically the ban on continuous honking, go in the same direction. Even though the "Kasper Frogs" have somewhat moderated their language following the articles here on buergerstimme.net, Pagel does not refrain from repeatedly spouting lies and defamation about me like a broken record. He not only spreads disinformation but outright lies, incites against me and others, and thus tries to generate hate. Interestingly, in this context, Christian Pagel positions himself within the ranks of the governing parties, which like to pretend they are combating hate and incitement. I have yet to see a post from a regional politician calling for Pagel or the other "Kasper Frogs" to moderate or distancing themselves from these individuals. The usual double standards. The Tone Has Become RougherIt’s astonishing that the governing politics, even at the municipal level, notes that the tone has become rougher. At a demo in Dresden, Hendrik Wüst and Michael Kretschmer were photographed with a sign reading: "Wer Hass säet, erntet Gewalt!" (the spelling mistake is on the sign). In my opinion, it’s forgotten who started sowing hate. This clearly intensified with the exclusion and hate against those who, during the pandemic years, refused to comply with measures and get the experimental substances. This hate was also stoked and fueled by governing politicians. Those who no longer remember this should refer to ich-habe-mitgemacht.de. There, you’ll find hundreds of hate-filled comments, such as: "Track down! Capture! Intern & vaccinate!" from the Antifa. These are the same people who currently like to show themselves alongside government and regional politicians to demonstrate together against the right, claiming to be against tracking down, capturing, interning, and forced treatment, as practiced by fascists and Nazis in the past. How Do We Break Out of This Spiral?If Divide and Rule - Divide et impera is no longer to be the motto of politics, it’s time for the political establishment to take some steps toward the critics. The critics have repeatedly sought dialogue. These requests have been rejected with few exceptions. Thus, it seems the governing politics is still not about closing rifts and overcoming division. Consequently, it’s no surprise if some express themselves "more concretely" because they feel unrepresented by politics, not even heard, but met with ignorance. And because they have experienced how they were incited against. Author: AI-Translation - Michael Thurm | vor dem 01.07.2024 |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Win 15 Million – Join Quickly in the Nationwide Intelligence TestThese are truly fantastic news that, unfortunately, were completely overshadowed in the media due to the state elections. At the beginning of September, the federal government laun... zum Artikel |
 | Clueless — and plenty of it! Blind Decision-Making, Irresponsibility, and Lack of Transparency in the Weißenfels City Council Regarding the IKIGThe recent developments surrounding the planning and discussion of the Intermunicipal Industrial Area (IKIG) shed light on the information policies of the city of Weißenfels and t... zum Artikel |
 | The Enemy of the State Runs a Car Dealership – 5 Years in Prison for Selling Luxury Cars to RussiaWe live in the best Germany there has ever been. Orwell could hardly have dreamed of something like this.... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |