Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
The deadline ignorer and double-standard measurer - still no answer to question in the district council from District Administrator Götz Ulrich (CDU)Do you also know people like this, who are always very pedantic towards you and immediately know when you may, under certain circumstances, possibly have done something not entirely correctly? 
The district administrator of the Burgenland district, beloved by many, Götz Ulrich (CDU), and his associates belong to this type of people. At the last district council meeting on 30.03.2026, I asked why it was so important to District Administrator Götz Ulrich (CDU) that the people of the Burgenland district take part in the testing of these highly modern corona vaccines. The former Federal Minister of Health Jens Spahn stated on 15.12.2025 in the Bundestag’s inquiry commission that these “vaccines” are still being tested on the market – meaning in the people who had them injected. According to the rules of procedure of the district council, if a question cannot be answered immediately, a written answer should be provided within one month. This deadline, which the district council itself defined, had expired on 30.04.2026. What was still not found in the mailbox by then? Correct! A written answer. Members of the Götz Ulrich fan club will now surely point out that the post sometimes takes a little longer and that the answer will most definitely come soon. I would like to remind these fans that in administration and in the judicial system, it is the date of receipt and not the date of dispatch that is decisive. If you file an objection, a lawsuit, or a complaint, it must have been received by the competent authority within the specified deadline. If the mail or fax arrives even one minute later, your objection, lawsuit, or complaint will be rejected as inadmissible for exactly that reason. Your reasoning, even if you were 1000 percent right, then does not matter to anyone. So that I am not misunderstood: I have no problem if authorities were to say, “Laws, regulations – well, you shouldn’t take them too rigidly, because we need flexibility” – as long as this flexibility were also granted to those affected, the citizens. However, authorities repeatedly show themselves to be extremely inflexible in dealing with citizens and insist on compliance with laws. That is, compliance with their interpretation of the law, which at times differs significantly from the actual laws. One may recall the prohibition of video recording of a district council committee meeting in October 2024 by the beloved district administrator Götz Ulrich (CDU), because I had not registered it in advance. The beloved district administrator showed no mercy, saw no importance in making this meeting public. In his view, press law and press freedom had to submit to the rules of procedure of the district council, which require prior registration. My objection to this was not answered with an objection notice, but only with a letter from the legal and regulatory office stating that my objection was not the correct legal remedy. Which legal remedy would have been correct was, of course, not communicated. That would have created the risk that this permissible legal remedy would be used. As a district administrator, one can understandably not want that, because then the district administrator would have to deal with the fact that his decision was unlawful. Also worth recalling is the video recording of a district council committee meeting a few weeks ago. Here I also had to argue about whether I had registered the video recording of all district council committee meetings or only of the district committee meetings. Had four letters been missing, the super great democrats would not have allowed the video recording. Why am I so pedantic?Because the district administrator of the Burgenland district, Götz Ulrich (CDU), beloved by many, and the associates of the district administration as well as the Götz Ulrich fans among the district council members are so pedantic.I measure people by their own stated rules. So if the rules of procedure of the district council, which were amended in January 2026 to state that, for example, video recordings must be registered at least three hours in advance in order to be able to prohibit such recordings in case of late registration, stipulate that a written answer must be provided within one month, then it must be in the mailbox within one month. But as can once again be seen without doubt in this case, the beloved district administrator does not adhere to these rules, even though the rules of procedure of the district council were previously so extremely important to him. If someone behaves towards me as pedantically as the district administrator does, I take a very close look and repeatedly find that administrative staff, but also judges, apparently see laws more as guidelines when it comes to their own actions. However, when it comes to putting this citizen, this sovereign, in their place, four letters in a word or even a few seconds can be decisive. The beloved chairman of the district council, Andy Haugk, also considers the rules of procedure important when it comes to shutting down unwelcome questions from citizens. The use of double standards in this “our democracy”Yes, this is “our democracy,” which must always and constantly be defended. And in this “our democracy,” the use of double standards is obviously firmly anchored. The employees of the citizens – including the beloved district administrator Götz Ulrich (CDU) – do not have to adhere to legal requirements. Not even those they themselves agreed to. The citizen, however, does. And heaven help them if not, because then there are sanctions, fines, or worse.If the beloved district administrator lets deadlines pass, he has nothing to fear. Because it has not been defined that he would then, for example, have to pay me a fine. If he delays answering even further, I would have the right to file a lawsuit demanding that an answer be provided. Although the beloved district administrator Götz Ulrich (CDU) believes that an answer to a question does not necessarily have to include answering the question itself. I am curious when the postman will put the answer from the beloved district administrator into my mailbox. Perhaps this time it will not take as many months as with some previous questions I asked in the district council. Because then I would have to repeatedly remind them of the missing answer in the district council. And that then annoys the beloved chairman of the district council, Andy Haugk, who may feel prompted to shut down these reminders and questions because... that is simply part of this “our democracy”. Author: AI-Translation - Michael Thurm | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Police Ban Walk Without Citing Legal BasisIn Aschersleben, it is still not possible to fully exercise the constitutionally guaranteed right to demonstrate.... zum Artikel |
 | Second Peace Rally of This Year in Zeitz on February 3, 2025On February 3, the second peace rally of 2025 took place in our hometown Zeitz. In addition to the weekly protest actions such as the bridge lighting over the B2 and the A9, as wel... zum Artikel |
 | The Repeated Call for Peace and Justice! Monday Demonstration and Car Convoy in Zeitz on August 5, 2024The continuation of the peace movement in Zeitz. With emotional speeches and inspiring songs, the demonstrators sent a message against war and oppression.... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |