|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
Your Panic Doesn’t Convince Me! – The Debate About Global Warming Caused by Human CO2 Is Also Being Held in BurgenlandkreisEven in Burgenlandkreis, there are supporters of the theory that human-produced CO2 is more or less responsible for global warming. It is astonishing that many of those who unquestioningly followed the pandemic narrative are now also following the narrative of global warming caused by CO2, or more precisely, by human-produced CO2. Some of those who were pandemic followers now act with the same "enthusiasm" as climate followers. Mentioned here are the clown frogs who endlessly post their fear and panic in various Facebook groups about how terrible the current climate is, how much worse it will get, and how we should all drive electric cars—while they themselves still drive combustion engines and fly on vacation. Naturally, anyone who thinks differently is labeled a climate denier, contrarian, and undoubtedly stupid. And of course, as the narrative demands, they call for measures to reduce CO2. Some even see CO2 not as an essential basis for all plant life and consequently animal and human life, but as a kind of poison that in too high a dose would lead to the "death of the planet." Not only based on the experiences and many facts that come to light daily regarding the pandemic and confirm that these conspiracy theorists were right on essential points, I have long since stopped trusting the narrative on climate. I have to say: "Your panic doesn’t convince me!" The numbers about the share of CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere, which anyone can look up on Wikipedia, do not convince me that the CO2 caused by humans is the cause of current global warming. Especially since there have always been climate changes that could not have been caused by humans. Wikipedia lists the composition of the Earth’s atmosphere as follows: nitrogen 78.08%, oxygen 20.95%, argon 0.93%, and carbon dioxide 0.04%. Water or water vapor, which depending on the region makes up 1% to 4% of the atmosphere and is also said to be responsible for global warming, is omitted. The attentive reader will surely notice that the proportion of water vapor is higher than that of CO2. Should we then do something against water vapor (rain clouds) in the atmosphere? Do we need a water or water vapor tax? Probably better not to give politicians such ideas. Other gases with even smaller shares than the trace gas CO2 are also not listed. It is known that about 97% of the 0.04% CO2 in the atmosphere is of natural origin. Therefore, the human share of CO2 in the atmosphere is about 0.0012%. Germany’s share of this 0.0012% is about 2%, which corresponds to 0.000024% of the atmosphere. Are these dramatic numbers? I am familiar with the reporting that uses the overflowing bathtub analogy to suggest that the apocalypse is imminent if immediate action is not taken. The beloved federal government is making great efforts to pass laws aimed at preferably stopping climate change. Although this is viewed much less dramatically in other countries, as Prof. Dr. Gerd Ganteför reports about Malaysia. It is certainly not excluded that Germany will introduce measures and restrictions in the future to achieve climate protection goals. How effective restrictions and measures were, everyone surely remembers from the pandemic years. It is always difficult to visually represent abstract numbers to show proportions. It is often pointed out by how many percent CO2 has increased since the start of industrialization. Critics like Markus Fiedler cannot verify this based on the available data. That the share of CO2 in the atmosphere is very small is usually omitted or dramatized. That 97% is of natural origin is rarely or only briefly mentioned. Possibly so people do not get the idea to take measures to reduce the 97%, for example from 97% to 94%, to compensate for the 3% caused by humans. I asked Artificial Intelligence to generate the following graphic, which colorfully displays the relative distribution of gases in the atmosphere. In the graphic, white represents nitrogen, light blue oxygen, and orange argon. Green, black, and red represent the total CO2 present. Green is the naturally occurring CO2, black and red represent human-produced CO2, with red being Germany’s share. I ask you to count the black and red pixels and maybe the others as well. 
For those in a hurryTo spare anyone the trouble, here is the breakdown: nitrogen has 3,253,333 pixels, oxygen has 872,916 pixels, argon has 38,750 pixels. Natural CO2 accounts for 1,615 pixels. The dramatic values are the human-produced 51 pixels, of which 1 pixel represents Germany’s share. Yes, that single red pixel is in the graphic.Now everyone can make up their own mind whether this 1 pixel out of 4,166,666 pixels is meaningfully decisive for climate change, or if it is the 51 pixels. I have serious doubts and see no reason to panic about CO2 or follow the climate hype after the virus hype. PostscriptApparently, Jens Rothe from the group of aforementioned clown frogs felt compelled to post a graphic to support his thesis. 
In response, I only posted the link to this article. Jens Rothe commented as follows: What do you call a condition when someone deliberately runs into a wall, everyone warns them, and they keep doing the same thing over and over? In another comment, he wrote: One example among many why your naive calculation is just stupid and your conclusions even stupider. A single drop of oil can contaminate 600 liters of water. 20 drops of water equal about 1 ml of water. So (20x1000x600=12,000,000 drops) 12 million drops equal about 600 liters. If even one of those 12 million drops is oil, the water is unusable and polluted. That’s roughly 0.00001%. And now comes Thurmiboy with his gutter science. That’s deliberate stupidity, isn’t it, Michael Thurm? On the other hand, such bullshit exactly fits the concept of your trash page. All for the unthinking, patriotic angry citizen afraid of vaccines. Jens Rothe thereby confirms what I wrote above, that CO2 is sometimes even viewed as a kind of poison. I replied: Your error in reasoning is that it’s not about oil but CO2. You don’t take into account that 97% of the CO2 in the atmosphere is of natural origin. According to your logic, nature itself would produce multiple times the amount of ‘oil’ and thus pollute water etc. That is not the case. CO2 is necessary for plant growth. CO2 does not poison or contaminate anything. No CO2, no plant growth, no food for animals, and no food for humans. Without CO2, you wouldn’t exist. Look into the topic of C3 plants and under what CO2 concentration they grow best: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kohlenstoffdioxid-D%C3%BCngung You will learn that for these plants 800 to 1000 ppm CO2 would be optimal—2 to 2.5 times what is currently in the atmosphere. And you will learn that 90 percent of plants are C3 plants: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/C3-Pflanze Thus, plants are currently all under-supplied with CO2. Conversely, a bit more CO2 improves plant growth. So you can assume that plants use the small amount of CO2 caused by humans from the atmosphere and thus grow faster. The plants then reduce the CO2 again. Your panic doesn’t convince me! Jens Rothe has posted no further comments on this matter. Author: AI-Translation - Michael Thurm | vor dem 01.07.2024 |
|
| Other articles: |
 | The Fairy Tale of the Independent Judiciary and the German Rule of LawThe sparrows are now unmistakably chirping it from the rooftops, but the doves still don't want to hear it.... zum Artikel |
 | District Council Approves AfD Proposal – Unsustainable Democratic Conditions?Shortly after the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, under the authority of the Federal Ministry of the Interior and former Minister Nancy Faeser, hastily class... zum Artikel |
 | The Grim Reaper in Zeitz: Incredible Sight or Dark Prophecy?What happens when Reese and Ërnst chat in their cozy living room about the legendary events in Zeitz? A dark chapter of history is opened: The Grim Reaper is said to have been sig... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |