|
|
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
| Home About Contact | ||
![]() |
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
||
A Shame for Germany and the Rule of Law – David Bendels Triumphs Against Former Federal Interior Minister Nancy FaeserWhat a political and judicial tragedy! What an incredible scandal that a journalist was dragged to court over a satirical meme – and only on appeal was the rule of law somewhat restored.
David Bendels, editor-in-chief of the “Deutschland‑Kurier,” was acquitted of defamation by the Bamberg Regional Court after having been convicted in the first instance for a photomontage of former Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser. The meme – and what it conveyed: In February 2024, Bendels posted an edited image on the platform X showing Faeser holding a sign that read “I hate freedom of speech!” Ironically, the meme proved itself true: By filing a complaint against Bendels and thereby initiating a case against satire, she did exactly what the meme mocked: she effectively attacked freedom of speech. Her legal action gave the impression that she truly seems to hate freedom of speech. An absurd spectacle: The former Federal Interior Minister, whose role should have been to protect citizens' rights, apparently does not shy away from restricting an individual citizen’s fundamental rights through criminal prosecution. However, the Bamberg District Court initially saw the meme – in the first instance – as a deliberately false and contemptuous factual claim and sentenced Bendels to seven months probation and a written apology. A decision nothing short of bizarre: A journalist was to be held liable for expressing political criticism in exaggerated visual form – pure satire!
Source: Deutschland Kurier on Facebook Now, in January 2026, this verdict was overturned on appeal: The Bamberg Regional Court recognized that the photomontage is protected by freedom of expression in its overall context and does not constitute criminal defamation. Even the public prosecutor acknowledged that the post should be considered legitimate, still permissible political criticism – and therefore requested a not guilty verdict. And here lies the real shame:
Anyone who seriously claims that an edited image expressing pointed political criticism constitutes criminal defamation proves only one thing: that our rule of law is at stake once the judiciary is willing to push political satire into criminality. A meme became a litmus test for freedom of speech – and only reluctantly did the second instance drag the idea of liberty back into the light. This must never become normal. Satire must not be punishable. Criticism must not be criminalized. Politicians must not resort to criminal law just because they cannot bear a punchline.
Source: Deutschland Kurier on Facebook Author: AI-Translation - АИИ | |
|
| Other articles: |
![]() | Is CDU state parliament member Elke Simon-Kuch paying employees from public funds for her company?Tim Kellner published a video on Telegram in which the question is raised whether CDU state parliament member Elke Simon-Kuch is paying an employee of her company using public fund... zum Artikel |
![]() | Unbelievable Conditions at the District Court - Doctor Convicted for Scientifically Correct WorkWhat happens when the law turns reality on its head? A doctor in Germany is sentenced because she applied scientifically correct knowledge.... zum Artikel |
![]() | The Prophetic Warning: Speech by Oliver Kirchner (AfD) from 2021 and the Revealed Shadows of Corona Policy in Saxony-AnhaltIn September 2021, amid a heated debate in the state parliament of Saxony-Anhalt, Oliver Kirchner of the AfD raised his voice against the ongoing Corona measures, which he branded ... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |