Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! |
||
The Lies of Federal Health Minister Nina Warken – No Patient Autonomy and No Therapeutic Freedom for Doctors in GermanyU.S. Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has written a letter to Federal Health Minister Nina Warken. 
ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR. VERSUS NINA WARKENDear Community, U.S. Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has written a letter to Federal Health Minister Nina Warken. On “X” he posted a statement about it, the core message of which (translated into German) reads as follows: “Reports from Germany show that the government disregards patient autonomy and restricts people’s ability to act according to their own beliefs when making medical decisions.” https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/.../robert-f-kennedy... Nina Warken’s response did not take long. Patients, she said, were “free in their decision as to which therapy they choose to undergo.” She then writes: “During the Corona pandemic, there was at no time an obligation for the medical profession to administer vaccinations against COVID-19. Anyone who did not wish to offer vaccinations for medical, ethical, or personal reasons neither committed a criminal offense nor had to fear sanctions. There was no professional ban or fine if one did not vaccinate.” And she adds: “Criminal prosecution occurred exclusively in cases of fraud and forgery of documents, for example in the issuance of false vaccination certificates or fake mask exemption certificates.” https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/.../warken... The response of the Federal Health Minister is partly false and, moreover, reveals a blatant lack of awareness of the problem.For employees in the healthcare sector, there was indeed a professional ban if they could not provide proof of a COVID injection. For soldiers of the German Armed Forces, there was an obligation to tolerate such an injection; those who refused were dishonorably discharged from service and/or subjected to criminal proceedings for refusal to obey orders.The criminal proceedings concerning allegedly incorrect mask exemption certificates were based on a highly questionable interpretation of the relevant criminal offense: One can certainly doubt whether the certification that someone cannot wear a mask constitutes a “health certificate” within the meaning of Section 278 of the German Criminal Code, and the courts’ view that such a health certificate is “false” if it was not preceded by a personal examination by the doctor is, at the very least, questionable in this generality. Completely rejected by the courts was the – medically clearly demonstrable – fact that wearing masks is generally harmful to health and that the certificate therefore served to fend off an attack on physical integrity carried out in the form of a law or regulation. In the criminal proceedings concerning allegedly incorrect vaccination certificates or certificates of inability to be vaccinated, confessions by patients were, on the one hand, unlawfully extorted – namely by threatening that otherwise they would be taken for a blood test, and then one would see whether they had antibodies. But not all vaccinated individuals develop antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. See Tagesschau of June 17, 2021: https://www.tagesschau.de/.../gesundheit/immunitaet-109.html The confessions were therefore actually obtained through deception and, pursuant to Section 136a of the German Code of Criminal Procedure, inadmissible as evidence. But that did not bother the courts either – particularly not in the case of Dr. Heinrich Habig. Completely rejected was the defense’s argument by the doctors concerned that they had acted out of necessity in order to protect their patients from the consequences of state (or even private!) vaccination coercion in the form of 2G rules. The current regulation, according to which statutory health insurance general practitioners lose 40% of their retention allowance if they do not vaccinate, constitutes a clear attack on physicians’ therapeutic freedom. I commented on this in detail on my channels on October 18, 2025. Robert F. Kennedy is therefore absolutely right: During the Corona period, neither patient autonomy nor physicians’ therapeutic freedom was respected. And this condition continues to this day. Kind regards Yours sincerely, Martin Schwab
Author: AI-Translation - Martin Schwab | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Mysterious Place Names Decoded: The Journey Through the History of Our Homeland ContinuesWhat do the place names of our region mean? Nadja Laue and Volker Thurm offer insights in their second fascinating video into the origins and meanings of Naumburg, Altenburg, Jena,... zum Artikel |
 | Hope for Freedom of Expression and Democracy - Federal Administrative Court Lifts Ban on Compact MagazineThe Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig has lifted the ban on the Compact magazine, which had been imposed by the Federal Ministry of the Interior in the summer of 2024.... zum Artikel |
 | Seventh Time – And No End in Sight: Uichteritz Can Count on One Thing – The Inaction of the City of WeißenfelsIt is done – the dreaded seventh time! Once again, a truck, this time with Polish license plates, has wedged itself in the narrow streets of Uichteritz. Once again, the 200-year-... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |