|
|
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
| Home About Contact | ||
![]() |
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
||
No East German Participation in Nuclear Waste Repository SearchCounty Commissioner Götz Ulrich (CDU) devoted several minutes to the search for a nuclear waste repository during the district council meeting on December 8, 2025. One certainly not insignificant detail apparently had not caught his attention until now. In his report, County Commissioner Götz Ulrich (CDU) stated that the Federal Company for Radioactive Waste Disposal (BGE) published a new interim report on the search for a nuclear waste repository in November 2025; the process is still in Phase 1, Step 2, in which 90 sub-areas are being further narrowed down. By the end of 2027, these areas are to be classified into categories A to D, with only A and B considered potentially suitable; so far, 56 percent of the sub-areas have been evaluated, of which three percent fall into A or B. Two of these potentially suitable sites are located in the Burgenlandkreis, one west of Bad Bibra and one north of Karsdorf and Reinsdorf, connecting to the Saalekreis. After further examinations and environmental assessments, site regions are to be proposed by the end of 2027, although it is already foreseeable that the legally mandated Bundestag decision cannot be met by 2031. (detailed in the above video) No East German Participation in Nuclear Waste Repository SearchDistrict council member Detlef Hartung (faction "Freie Wähler/Bürger für Weißenfels/Landgemeinden/Vereinigte Bürgerliste-Fraktion") pointed out a certainly not insignificant detail that casts the entire nuclear waste repository search in a completely different light. The National Advisory Committee for the Repository Search does not include a single representative from the East German federal states. Twelve of the 16 committee members come from the four federal states where nuclear waste is produced by nuclear power plants. Not a single member comes from the New Federal States. (detailed in the above video)Detlef Hartung criticized this and wanted to know why it is so. District council chairman Andy Haugk initially said he did not hear a question in Detlef Hartung’s statements. County Commissioner Götz Ulrich could not answer and referred to the fact that this could be clarified in a district council committee. (detailed in the above video) Detlef Hartung spoke out against a “radiant future” in the Burgenlandkreis. Author: AI-Translation - Michael Thurm | |
|
| Other articles: |
![]() | The Rule of Law Consists Solely of Legal Tricks – The Case of Julia Neigel vs. the Free State of SaxonyDo you still believe in the rule of law? In an independent judiciary that protects citizens from state overreach? Forget it. The case of musician Julia Neigel against the Free Stat... zum Artikel |
![]() | Facebook is Against ToleranceImagine this: a post about tolerance, about queer life in Naumburg, about the subtle weighing of discrimination versus freedom of speech – and Facebook decides that's somehow too... zum Artikel |
![]() | The Prophetic Warning: Speech by Oliver Kirchner (AfD) from 2021 and the Revealed Shadows of Corona Policy in Saxony-AnhaltIn September 2021, amid a heated debate in the state parliament of Saxony-Anhalt, Oliver Kirchner of the AfD raised his voice against the ongoing Corona measures, which he branded ... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |