|
|
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
| Home About Contact | ||
![]() |
Jens Spahn: Corona Vaccination Without Protection Against Infection! Pandemic Lovers, Measure Supporters, Vaccine Worshippers – How Do You Feel Now?Who would have thought? Jens Spahn, former Federal Minister of Health and a long-time symbol of corona policy, laid his cards on the table on December 15, 2025, in the Inquiry Commission – and the content is explosive, downright shocking. Who would have thought? Jens Spahn, former Federal Minister of Health and a long-time symbol of corona policy, laid his cards on the table on December 15, 2025, in the Inquiry Commission – and the content is explosive, downright shocking. Spahn soberly stated: “As for the vaccine protection after vaccination, it was always clear – and was also defined by the WHO – that the goal of vaccine research and procurement was to have a vaccine that protects against severe outcomes. It was never the goal – not even by the WHO – that the vaccine development would aim to protect against infection towards third parties…”Stop! Anyone who still believes that the corona vaccine was ever intended to prevent infection or protect society can now be confidently corrected. Because exactly what politicians like Spahn propagated in countless press conferences, talk shows, and news reports was simply wrong. Let’s remember: “Vaccination protects – yourself and others” was said everywhere. Even Spahn himself communicated through the media that protection against infection was a central reason for the vaccination campaign. Today we know: That was not even the goal. The Explosive Statements of Dr. NehlsDr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, and other critics predicted it early on, and Dr. Heiko Schöning or Dr. Nehls were already asking the right questions back then. The latter brought the most explosive detail to light during the Inquiry Commission:“As for the vaccines, we know that even in the approval studies, no protection against infection and no protection against severe outcomes was proven. It is known that more people in the vaccinated group suffered compared to the control group. Why did you procure vaccines for children that contain the genetic blueprint of a virus potentially originating from a bioweapons lab, especially when children were not part of the risk group?”And what does Spahn say in response? A shrug as if to say: It was only about protection against severe outcomes. Not about infection. Not about the population. Just about the individual. How Do You Feel Now?So, pandemic lovers, measure supporters, vaccine worshippers: How do you feel now? Those who supported panic for years, celebrated measures, and pushed vaccination campaigns, are now facing a simple but deeply unsettling reality: Your idol Spahn lied to you – or at least grossly simplified the facts.The Question of the Sense Behind the Vaccination CampaignAnd the real question: How is it possible that billions of people, including children, were supposed to be made to take such a vaccine? That a vaccine mandate was nearly introduced in Germany – for something that, according to Spahn’s own statement, was never intended to protect society?Let’s not forget the numbers: What was the probability of suffering a severe outcome? Even in the risk group, the numbers were far lower than what was reported in the media. Many millions of people in Germany were effectively sacrificed for a “feeling of safety” – without the vaccine being able to actually deliver on that promise. The Euphemistic Downplaying of Effectiveness and RisksSpahn said:“The vaccines that are still being tested today – on the market, so to speak. And from which we can draw pretty clear conclusions about their effectiveness and their benefit-risk ratio.”And there it is again, this amazing blend of self-congratulation and denial of reality. “Pretty clear conclusions” – seriously? While billions of people worldwide were vaccinated, including children, independent studies repeatedly showed that the alleged effectiveness, if any, was minimal and the side effects were by no means trivial. How can someone responsible for procuring these vaccines dismiss the risks so casually, as if it were a new vitamin supplement? And above all: If it had been so clear – why was there a rush to vaccinate, propaganda pushed, and even a vaccine mandate considered? Pandemic lovers, measure supporters, vaccine worshippers – don’t you feel just a little bit deceived now, when you’re referred to as the “market”? The “clear conclusions” were apparently so clear that they either had to be hidden from the public or simply sweetened. Who Will Take Responsibility?Who will take responsibility? Who needs to answer – on a federal level, regional level, in counties, cities, municipalities? The vaccine mandate was stopped, but who will compensate the millions of people who got vaccinated in good faith or were coerced into it, or the businesses, schools, and families who had to subordinate their plans to politics?The bitterest punchline: For decades, arguments like “solidarity” and “protecting the vulnerable” were raised. Today, it is clear: It was an illusion. The pandemic lovers can now bask in their own confusion – and ask themselves how much of their trust in politics and science was actually justified. Who would have thought that the “great promise” – the vaccination campaign – would end up being exposed as an empty promise? Jens Spahn made it clear. The video above starts at the point where these questions and answers are discussed, after pressing play. Author: AI-Translation - АИИ | |
|
| Other articles: |
![]() | Why Does No One Stop the IKIG? – Madness Because of the Climate Craze?The IKIG – Intermunicipal Industrial Area – is supposed to be a milestone for Weißenfels, Lützen, Hohenmölsen, Teuchern, and the Burgenland district. People dream of 6,000 j... zum Artikel |
![]() | Protests Show Effect - Saxony-Anhalt Halts Repayment Demands for Corona Emergency AidIt was also reported here that the state of Saxony-Anhalt, through the Investment Bank, had begun demanding repayment of the Corona emergency aid from 2020.... zum Artikel |
![]() | State Government Pushes Districts into Even Higher Debt! - Exit from the Deutschland-Ticket?“We accuse the state government of breaking its promises,” declares Prof. Dr. Ariane Berger. Results of the District Administrators' Conference in Naumburg... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |