Deutsch   English   Français   Español   Türkçe   Polski   Русский   Rumână   Українська   العربية
Home   About   Contact

Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!




Deaths and Harm Caused by Vaccination and Pandemic Measures Are Considered Acceptable Costs According to Professor Christian Drosten


The review of the COVID-19 pandemic is being prevented or even obscured by those responsible, as much as possible. Nevertheless, certain facts are occasionally confirmed that should make everyone take notice.


The review of the COVID-19 pandemic is being prevented or even obscured by those responsible, as much as possible. Nevertheless, certain facts are occasionally confirmed that should make everyone take notice.

During the session of the Enquete Commission on December 1, 2025, Professor Christian Drosten was also questioned. He was the spokesperson for this "science." Christian Drosten was asked by Tom Lausen:

“Do you consider it possible that since 2020, strict measures such as curfews, visitation bans in nursing homes, contact restrictions, lockdowns, quarantine, isolation, canceled surgeries, and other drastic limitations may have caused additional deaths themselves, for example through loneliness, interruptions in care, medical underprovision, or loss of will to live, as the Ethics Council also stated early on, among elderly, care-dependent, or dementia patients? Yes or no!”

Christian Drosten responds: “You are asking whether measures caused additional deaths. Well, I believe that this was the case. All measures had costs, but we prevented far greater damage with these measures, and that is the crucial point.”

The video evidence is above. The video starts at the relevant point.

Christian Drosten confirms that even the so-called containment measures alone caused deaths. The mindset of this professor—and also of the policymakers—is therefore that human lives and health can be sacrificed because these are considered acceptable “costs.”

Regarding mass vaccination, deaths have also been confirmed.


Life Against Life is Unconstitutional

In this context, one should recall a decision by the Federal Constitutional Court regarding whether a hijacked passenger plane may be shot down, which would result in the deaths of the passengers if there was a danger that the plane could, for example, be directed into a football stadium, potentially causing fatalities there as well.

The Federal Constitutional Court declared the shooting down of hijacked planes by the Bundeswehr unconstitutional, as this violates human dignity and the fundamental right to life, because innocent passengers would be reduced to mere objects. A blanket shooting is prohibited; instead, individual case decisions must be made, with milder measures (diversion, warning shots) still allowed, but shooting as an “ultima ratio” is conceivable only in extreme exceptional cases and under strict conditions, which the court left open, while also criticizing the federal legislative competence.

Violation of human dignity: The court ruled that the state violates the human dignity of innocent passengers and crew by turning them into mere objects of a governmental decision.

“Life Against Life” is Not Permissible: Weighing human lives (e.g., passengers against people on the ground) is not allowed under the Basic Law.

Applied to the pandemic measures and also mass vaccination, this means that both the measures and the vaccinations—which cost not only the health of numerous people but also the lives of a not insignificant number of people—were unconstitutional.

Of course, this has so far been ignored by those responsible—even at the regional level. Taking actual responsibility has not been the nature of responsible politicians for some time.

Author: AI-Translation - Michael Thurm  | 

Jeden Tag neue Angebote bis zu 70 Prozent reduziert

Other articles:

Those Who Have the Vote Can Already Smell the Fraud?

The election revealed a questionable strategy by the CDU: The charismatic mayoral candidate Martin Papke used his popularity to gather votes, even though he did not intend to take ... zum Artikel

24-Hour Clothing Swap – Now Also in Hohenmölsen

Fashion lovers, take note: Hohenmölsen surprises with a brand-new concept of urban clothing culture – two clothing swap stations, open around the clock, invite fashion-hungry pa... zum Artikel

DIVIDE and RULE! Manfred is fully on board! Manfred didn’t get it!

I take much of what’s going on out there in this world of ours with humor, polemics, even cynicism. If you took everything seriously, you'd probably go mad. But there are contemp... zum Artikel

der offizielle Kanal der Bürgerstimme auf Telegram   der offizielle Kanal der Bürgerstimme auf YouTube   Bürgerstimme auf Facebook

Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions:
via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12

or via bank transfer
IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719
BIC: SUMUIE22XXX
Account holder: Michael Thurm


Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips   Imprint / Disclaimer