|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
Cover-ups, Concealment, Downplaying: The Vaccine Data Scandal Surrounding the SafeVac App of the PEI (Paul-Ehrlich-Institut)!What was hidden in the dark for years is now being trivialized – is the “worthless” vaccine app concealing a scandal of historic proportions? 
An unbelievable statement: In response to a request for the SafeVac 2.0 app data from the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI), the Federal Ministry of Health announced today that no valid conclusions about vaccine safety can be drawn from this data, which has been kept secret for years, because “valid conclusions about vaccine safety can only be derived from the spontaneous reporting system.” On the PEI website(1), however, it states: “In the regular recording of suspected cases of vaccine side effects within the framework of spontaneous reporting, suspected cases are indeed recorded, but it is not known how many reactions are not reported for various reasons. The SafeVac 2.0 study, on the other hand, enabled the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut to conduct quantitative analyses of possible side effects, since the number of participating individuals was known and adverse reactions were documented on a daily basis. With the associated SafeVac 2.0 app, the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut received not only information on suspected side effects but also on the proportion of vaccinated individuals who tolerated the vaccination well.” As early as 2017, the PEI also reported on the enormous shortcomings of the spontaneous reporting system(2): “The possibilities of analyses in the ADR database are opposed by known limitations of the spontaneous reporting system. Estimates suggest that only about six percent of all ADRs and five to ten percent of serious ADRs are reported (underreporting).³ In addition, reports are often incompletely documented. Furthermore, the actual rate of ADRs cannot be determined on the basis of spontaneous reports, since neither the number of ADRs that occurred (numerator) nor the number of patients treated with this medicinal product (denominator) is precisely known.” The SafeVac app was therefore intended to be used for monitoring the safety of vaccines. Despite ongoing legal proceedings (3), the PEI is not releasing the data – and suddenly this data supposedly no longer has any valid significance. (1) https://www.pei.de/DE/service/faq/weitere/faq-coronavirus-inhalt.html under the question "What is the particular benefit of the SafeVac 2.0 study?". (2) https://www.pei.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/newsroom/bulletin-arzneimittelsicherheit/2017/1-2017.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4 (3) https://blog.bastian-barucker.de/eilantrag-hesselbarth-rohdaten-safevac2-0-app/ 
Author: AI-Translation - Bastian Barucker | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Billions in Costs – Climate Protection Act of Saxony-Anhalt to Be Passed on FridayWith the new Climate Protection Act of Saxony-Anhalt (Parliamentary Paper 8/6150), introduced by the parliamentary group of Alliance 90/The Greens, the state aims to establish a bi... zum Artikel |
 | Great Fear in the Burgenland District: Will the AfD ruin our wonderful energy transition and beautiful structural change?We all love it, we all want it: structural change! But one specter is ever-present in the minds of our beloved politicians. The specter of the AfD.... zum Artikel |
 | Future Dialogue Part 3 – Preserving Existing Properties Instead of Building on Greenfield SitesIn the third part of the Future Dialogue "How Should Our Burgenlandkreis Develop by 2038?", a highly topical issue came into focus: the handling of existing properties – building... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |