|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
Population Reduction through CO₂ Reduction? The Climate Change Apocalyptics: Facts Only up to the HorizonDo you know those people who immediately go into defensive mode during discussions because they feel personally attacked as soon as the narrative is questioned? There are many of them online. They immediately wield the "facts club," but only their own facts count. Yet what they call "facts" are not facts per se – they are the facts of the narrative. 
The fear of CO₂ runs deep in the minds of these climate apocalyptics. They see current CO₂ concentrations of around 400 ppm (400 CO₂ molecules per million air molecules) as a threat. According to their worldview, there were supposedly only 280 ppm before industrialization. This number comes from ice cores, which are considered a "definitive source." Fun fact on the side: CO₂ concentrations at the poles are generally lower than in regions with flora and fauna. CO₂ does spread globally, but the polar regions are relatively isolated due to atmospheric circulation patterns. The air there comes from cold ocean regions, which contain less CO₂ because colder water stores CO₂ better. So anyone using ice cores from Arctic regions as a global reference should ask themselves how meaningful that really is. 400 ppm Even Before IndustrializationInterestingly, as early as the 1850s, scientists like Pettenkofer conducted direct measurements that – surprise, surprise – also recorded values around 400 ppm. The 280 ppm figure for pre-industrial times thus stands on shaky ground.Population Reduction through CO₂ Reduction?The CO₂-phobics, who think only as far as the horizon, do not see what would happen if CO₂ were actually reduced to 280 ppm. The consequences would be catastrophic. 80 % of the plants on Earth are C3 plants, which grow best at 800–1000 ppm CO₂. These include our most important food crops, such as cereals. At 280 ppm, yields would drop by up to 40 %. Plants would need to take up more water (requiring more irrigation) because their stomata would have to remain open longer to absorb CO₂ – while at the same time more water would evaporate through these openings.8 billion people could not be fed this way. Famines, mass migrations, resource conflicts, war, violence, and death would be the logical outcome. Historical examples confirm that climatic changes (without human influence on CO₂) have already triggered massive famines. It almost seems as if some CO₂-phobics desire exactly such scenarios: population reduction through CO₂ reduction. Politics Does Not Believe in the CO₂ NarrativePolitics itself does not seem to truly believe in the CO₂ narrative – as evidenced by the Ukraine war and massive armament. If CO₂ were really that terrible, all things producing CO₂ would have to be stopped immediately. Weapons production and war industries would be at the top of the list. European politicians would have to sit in fear sweat with Putin to end the Ukraine war to prevent the global population from succumbing to heat death. But the exact opposite is happening – and strangely, CO₂-phobics still support these political decisions.The discrepancy between the narrative embedded in minds and actual actions is obvious. Yet once fear is ingrained, it remains, even when facts contradict it. Everyone Must Decide for ThemselvesDo you want to continue submitting to this fear, or do you want to make it clear to politics that Germany must take a different course? After all, very few citizens enjoy paying ever higher taxes and fees due to CO₂ taxation, which ultimately ends up in all consumer prices.It makes no sense for everyone to buy an electric car while thousands of tanks and fighter jets are simultaneously being built – whose CO₂ footprint is anything but climate-friendly. Cognitive DissonanceYes, the climate change apocalyptics will now argue that the military produces only a small fraction of CO₂. At the same time, they claim that even tiny amounts of CO₂ would massively accelerate climate change. So how do we want it, dear friends? Can we trust that you, the climate change apocalyptics, will actually spend your next vacation at home? Or will you not give up your CO₂-blasting plane to the south, even though heat death lurks there? Or do you ignore it because it's only "minimal amounts" of CO₂ – the same amounts you otherwise immediately label as the end of the world?Author: AI-Translation - АИИ | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Experience Report on the 10th Democracy Conference – How Citizen-Friendly Is Local Politics?The Partnership for Democracy invited to the 10th Democracy Conference within the framework of the federal program “Living Democracy!” on April 25, 2024, at the Konrad-Martin-H... zum Artikel |
 | Invitation to an Open DialogueOn October 5, 2024, an event under the motto “Invitation to an Open Dialogue” will take place in Berlin-Marzahn. The organizers call on everyo... zum Artikel |
 | Children's Festival in Weissenfels Also CancelledThe children's festival at the Weissenfels outdoor pool will not take place as planned on June 1, 2024.... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |