Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
CDU District Administrator Götz Ulrich Plays the Tough Guy – Suddenly, He Wants Sound Finances and More Local Self-Government!Now he even wants to write the laws himself. The man who has obediently rubber-stamped directives from above for more than a decade has suddenly discovered the courage to “unshackle” local government. How touching. And how transparent. 
On October 13, 2026, Götz Ulrich, CDU district administrator of the Burgenlandkreis since 2014, president of the District Council of Saxony-Anhalt and vice-president of the German District Council, posts a short clip: “We finally need to unshackle local self-government!” Accompanying it is the battle cry: “District Assembly in Saxony-Anhalt. We are fighting for local self-government!” A day later comes the big announcement: “More trust, less control, sound finances: Our districts and municipalities in Saxony-Anhalt can no longer wait! For Saxony-Anhalt, I propose a municipal consultation mechanism: If decisions fail to materialize, we municipalities will draw up legislative proposals ourselves and seek parliamentary majorities among the state parliamentary groups.” Well, well. The administrator suddenly wants to play legislator. The man who spent years going with the flow is now demanding “less control” and “sound finances.” One can hardly believe one's eyes. Where was this Ulrich when municipalities and districts were systematically hollowed out – by his very own party, no less? The Dutiful EnforcerGötz Ulrich has been district administrator since July 2014. Re-elected in 2021 with a comfortable 55 percent of the vote. A lawyer who previously served as mayor of a collective municipality. Typical: the professional administrator who implements directives from Magdeburg and Berlin rather than questioning them. Education policy, tourism, structural change, tough Bürgergeld welfare policies – he weighs in when it suits him. But oppose the powers that be? Challenge his own CDU at state or federal level? Not a chance.During the coronavirus pandemic, he was the model pupil. Keep your distance, wear a mask, avoid crowds – he preached these rules “passionately,” according to local media reports. When he himself became infected in 2020, he dutifully apologized to the people who had to go into quarantine after coming into contact with him. Not a hint of criticism of the often arbitrary, centrally imposed measures that drove municipalities and citizens to distraction. Not a peep against the excessive regulation he still defends today. Back then, he was the loyal enforcer. Today, he has discovered “unshackling.” The same pattern applies to migration and finances: he complains about being overwhelmed (8,000 people instead of 500 who could realistically be integrated), abuse of Bürgergeld benefits, and a backlog of funding applications (“We're practically checking ourselves to death”). All legitimate concerns. But the causes? They lie in Berlin and Magdeburg – where the CDU has long had a seat at the table or has been in government. The Merkel years, the Haseloff years: the structural underfunding of municipalities, the explosion in social spending, the bureaucratic monsters – none of this fell from the sky. Ulrich's own party helped build and sustain this system. Why doesn't he name those responsible? Because it would be uncomfortable. Because you go with the flow as long as your own party's colors fly at the top. Between the Lines: The Opportunistic Political ChameleonWhat can be inferred from his posts and their timing is pure fear of losing power. Saxony-Anhalt is heading toward political upheaval. A state government led by the AfD is on the horizon. And suddenly, at precisely this moment, the CDU district administrator wants to “take matters into his own hands,” draw up legislative proposals and seek majorities among the state parliamentary groups – in effect, bypassing the elected state government. “Our willingness to engage in dialogue does not mean blind allegiance,” he emphasizes. Translation: If the wrong people take power, we local politicians will do our own thing.Where was this rebellious spirit when the CDU, with or without coalition partners, dominated state and federal politics? When the municipalities were driven to the brink under Merkel and Haseloff? Nothing. Silence. Going along. Administering. Now that the wind might be changing, Ulrich is playing the tough guy. This is not a matter of principle. It is opportunism in its purest form. A political chameleon positioning himself in good time in case the AfD gains strength – so he can then present himself as the guardian of the “democratic and constitutional foundations of the rule of law,” while absolving his own party of all responsibility. Who Is to Blame for the State of Our Municipalities?The answer is as simple as it is embarrassing for Ulrich: his own party. Decades of CDU participation in federal government, years of CDU leadership in Saxony-Anhalt – and municipalities are groaning under the burden of social spending, funding bureaucracy and a lack of local autonomy. Ulrich is now loudly lamenting all of this. The actual architects of the mess? Off-limits. This is not courageous local self-government. It is partisan selectivity.He is fighting “for local self-government” – after faithfully implementing directives from above for twelve years. He wants “sound finances” – after financial distress escalated under his party's watch. He wants to write laws himself – after never seriously rebelling against centralized micromanagement in his role as an administrator. Götz Ulrich is no rebel. He is the classic system administrator who dutifully goes along with everything until his own seat starts to wobble. Then the quiet man suddenly turns into a loudspeaker. This performance now, despite the problems having been known for years, is not a new beginning. It is panic. And an attempt to market himself as an independent local-government hero in case things go south – even though he has spent his entire career as a party loyalist. Unshackling local self-government? By all means. But first, Mr. Ulrich should free himself from the shackles of his own double standards. As long as he refuses to name the culprits within his own ranks, his “fight” will remain empty bluster from a career politician who can smell a change in the wind and knows when to trim his sails.
And a Question for a FriendIf politicians always want only the best for the people, why is there a need to fight at all? And against whom?Why are district administrators suddenly “fighting” for local self-government? Why “unshackle” it? Why write legislative proposals themselves and seek majorities, as though they were facing a hostile power? The answer is as simple as it is uncomfortable: because the policies pursued so far do not always serve the people's best interests. They serve what is best for politicians themselves, for their own party, for staying in power, and for the convenience of centralized control. If this were really about the people, no one would have to fight against bureaucracy, underfunding and micromanagement – least of all a CDU district administrator fighting against structures that his own party helped create and defend for years. None of this would exist in the first place. They would simply govern instead of putting on a show whenever the wind changes. Author: AI-Translation - АИИ | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Katja Kipping and the missed reckoning: how a Left Party politician retrospectively legitimizes the federal government’s COVID policy - despite RKI files and revealed policy failuresKatja Kipping appears before the Bundestag inquiry commission and calmly explains: the measures were basically good, just not social enough. Lockdowns, mask mandates, school closur... zum Artikel |
 | The Coffers Are Empty - District Council Meeting of December 9, 2024Numerous topics were on the agenda. One thing became clear: The coffers are empty.... zum Artikel |
 | Protest Before the IKIG Vote in Teuchern on March 6, 2025This is likely the third attempt in Teuchern to vote on the IKIG (Intermunicipal Industrial Area). A protest demonstration has once again been called for.... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |