Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
Saxony Locked Up Quarantine Refusers – Including a 14-Year-Old! SPD Minister Köpping Still Denies It Today and Apparently LiesSaxony forcibly interned people, including a minor, for days—and former Health Minister Petra Köpping continues to claim the opposite. What happened behind the scenes, how governing coalition parties obstructed efforts to uncover the truth, and why this scandal exposes the entire COVID-19 policy: the explosive video by the Jaworskis reveals what officials allegedly want to cover up. Be sure to watch it for yourself! 
The COVID era in Saxony was marked not only by curfews, school closures, and mass testing. It was also a time when people—including teenagers—were locked up because they refused to comply with quarantine orders. While those affected and political opposition figures are bringing the truth to light, former Health Minister Petra Köpping (SPD) still denies what can demonstrably be proven to have happened. She speaks of "fake news" and "false reports"—even though the CDU Interior Minister himself has acknowledged the internments. Welcome to Saxony's reality of poor accountability, a coalition of silence, and systematic denial. A 14-Year-Old Behind Bars: The Reality of Forced InternmentFrom April 2021 to March 2022, Saxony operated a facility at Hammerweg 26 in Dresden—directly next to the correctional facility and under police supervision—specifically for "persons to be forcibly isolated." According to Interior Minister Armin Schuster (CDU), the upgrade of this facility was approved during a cabinet meeting on January 20, 2021. The cost of the equipment alone amounted to approximately €19,000.Four people were interned there: a 14-year-old, a 21-year-old, a 26-year-old, and a 63-year-old. Their stays ranged from four to thirteen days. The legal basis? Germany's Infection Protection Act. No crime, no violence—only the allegation that they had failed to comply with quarantine requirements. A 14-year-old boy, already living through a period in which children and adolescents were heavily restricted by school closures, mask mandates, and contact bans, was additionally locked away. That is not a "mild measure." It is the state exercising harsh power against the most vulnerable. BSW parliamentarian Jens Hentschel-Thöricht, who has focused particularly on children's welfare in the COVID inquiry committee, says this deeply concerns him as well. Today we know that many of these measures—closing playgrounds in the open air, blanket quarantines based solely on PCR tests—were largely pointless or even unconstitutional. In 2025, the Saxon Constitutional Court ruled, among other things, that curfews were unconstitutional. People who resisted such rules could be interned—and this on the basis of a law that itself should now be under serious scrutiny. Köpping Denies, Denies, and Denies—Despite the EvidenceTo this day, former SPD Health Minister Petra Köpping states on her website: "No, there were never any plans to commit quarantine refusers to psychiatric institutions or lock them up. At no time. [...] Don't let yourselves be misled." In a 2023 interview with "Jung & Naiv," she even claimed that the option of placing people in police custody facilities had never been used. Quote: "But as I said, it was never actually carried out. Not here, not anywhere else."Reality tells a different story. In response to a parliamentary inquiry from the AfD, the Interior Minister admitted that the facility at Hammerweg 26 was operational and that people had indeed been housed there. As early as 2021, Köpping herself had acknowledged in an official response to an AfD inquiry that a property in Dresden was being converted into an isolation facility and, if necessary, would be operated by the police. She also stated that a concept was under development. Yet in 2023 she claimed the opposite—and labeled criticism "fake news." Even more striking were the plans involving a psychiatric hospital. Capacity was to be reserved at the Saxon psychiatric hospital in Arnsdorf. A leaked internment plan published by the Jaworskis leaves little room for interpretation: physical and psychiatric examination, assessment for suicidal tendencies, and, if necessary, transfer as "acute psychiatric patients." Köpping insists that this had "absolutely nothing to do with psychiatry." Yet the decree issued on April 8, 2020, required these arrangements to be in place starting April 9—and it was not revoked until April 11. It therefore remained valid for at least two days. Chemistry professor Dr. Jörg Matysik raised the issue of the internment plans before the inquiry committee on April 23, 2026—and was met with outrage from the governing coalition parties. CDU lawmakers read aloud a statement from the minister describing his claims as "defamation." A coalition of silence? "The Mafia has a term for it: a code of silence," the video says. The Inquiry Committee as an Obstacle Rather Than a Search for the TruthInstead of bringing the truth to light, Saxony's COVID inquiry committee appears to be doing everything possible to make a proper investigation more difficult. Governing coalition parties dismissed even the discussion of internment plans. Witnesses such as Matysik were reportedly put under pressure. Opposition politicians such as André Wendt (AfD, deputy chairman) and Jens Hentschel-Thöricht (BSW) have had to extract information painstakingly through parliamentary inquiries, while the governing parties at the time (CDU, SPD, Greens) act as though they knew nothing.Yet representatives of several ministries were members of the internal COVID crisis task force that Köpping herself announced in 2020. "I strongly assume that the state government—and that includes all ministries—knew that people had been interned," the video states. The claim that Köpping knew nothing about the internments at Hammerweg simply lacks credibility. Nevertheless, today's government has responded with silence. Parliament is in its summer recess, no official statement has been issued, while the contradictions have become increasingly obvious both in the media and in parliamentary proceedings. A Lack of Accountability, Concealed Responsibility, and the Question of Political FitnessThis case serves as a prime example of what lay behind the inflationary use of terms such as "false information" and "fake news", which political leaders reflexively invoked throughout the COVID era: a lack of accountability and willingness to admit mistakes. Köpping used media appearances to promote her version of events, withheld information about the police facility from the press, and described criticism as "defamation"—even though the facts are now documented in black and white.Is a minister who acts in this way still fit to hold office? The opposition is demanding answers: Why were less restrictive measures rejected? What assessment of the 14-year-old's welfare was carried out? Which court ordered the internments? Was the principle of proportionality examined at all? And why was the Infection Protection Act interpreted so broadly that even potentially healthy people (a positive PCR test with no symptoms required) could be subjected to internment? The governing coalition's response, according to critics, has been to admit as little as possible unless something is indisputably documented. The purpose of the inquiry committee should be to uncover the truth. Instead, it risks becoming an obstacle to it. Watch the Jaworskis' video for yourself: "Will Köpping Fall? Saxony's Suppressed COVID Internments…" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KKLG7gT__A). It features those directly involved, presents the leaked documents, and examines the contradictions in detail. A ten-day forced internment—and it did not even spare a 14-year-old. The truth can no longer be denied away. Author: AI-Translation - АИИ | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Your Questions for Martin Reichardt – Member of the Bundestag Addresses Your ConcernsMartin Reichardt, directly elected Member of the Bundestag for the Burgenlandkreis and the southern Saalekreis, has agreed to answer questions from Die Bürgerstimme in a vi... zum Artikel |
 | Creating More Health in Life - Interview with Anett WilferChristine Beutler talks with Anett Wilfer, a health-conscious mother, doctor, and alternative practitioner, who shares her experiences and insights on health, her new calling, and ... zum Artikel |
 | Mysterious Place Names: What's Behind Finne, Finneland, Eckarstberga, Obschütz, and Karsdorf?Five place names that sound as if they hide a riddle within: Finne, Finneland, Eckarstberga, Obschütz, and Karsdorf. What could be behind them? Ancient legends, mysterious structu... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |