Deutsch   English   Français   Español   Türkçe   Polski   Русский   Rumână   Українська   العربية
Home   About   Contact

Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!




The People Are the Greatest Threat to This “Our Democracy” — Which Is Why Chat Control Is Indispensable!


Oh, dear little citizens. You and your tiny, dangerous thoughts that you so shamelessly send around in WhatsApp chats, Signal messages, or even private emails. How dare you think freely, mock, or question anything?



The noble and beloved leaders of this “our democracy” — these selfless guardians of all that is good, led by visionary figures like Ursula von der Leyen and her loyal comrades in the EU Parliament — have finally realized the truth: The greatest threat to this “our democracy” is you. Not Russia. Not China. Not terrorists. No. You, the people, the sovereign, with your uncontrolled words.

That is why chat control is not merely useful. It is indispensable. A blessing. A protective wall. Anyone who opposes it hates children. Period.

Think of the Children!

Officially, of course, this is only about combating child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and online grooming. Since 2022, the European Commission has argued that the voluntary measures taken by tech companies are insufficient. There are loopholes. Therefore, all messages — yes, including encrypted ones — must be scanned by AI so authorities can identify and stop suspicious activity. According to supporters from the EPP camp, thousands of cases could be uncovered every single day this way. Otherwise, they warn, a “dangerous legal vacuum” would emerge.

How noble. How heartwarming. Our politicians sacrifice themselves solely to protect the little ones. The very same little ones who are gradually being prepared for military readiness so they can later be sent off heroically into wars for the interests of our many beloved leaders. Naturally, all in defense of “our values” and “our democracy.”

And who could possibly oppose protecting children? Only a monster. Or someone who secretly hates children. The logic is brilliant: anyone demanding privacy must obviously want child abuse to remain undetected. Genius.

If You Have Done Nothing Wrong, You Have Nothing to Fear!



Before the People Start Thinking the Wrong Thoughts!

Once this system is in place — AI reading every message, recognizing patterns, flagging “risks” — it opens up unimaginable possibilities. Today it scans for CSAM. Tomorrow? For “hate,” “disinformation,” “populism,” or critical, undemocratic thoughts about the next green tax, the next vaccine mandate, or the next EU treaty.

Thoughts are treacherous. Just because a joke seems harmless today doesn't mean it won't become the foundation of tomorrow's “dangerous hate speech.” A critical conversation among friends is only a short step away from becoming an “extremist network.” And before words turn into actions — as we all know how quickly that can happen in these uncertain times — this “our democracy” must be protected. Preventively. Through gentle, algorithmic care.

Everyone Should Be a Shepherd! Everyone Should Beware!

Just look around the world. Look at the countries that have been doing this properly for years! China, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, and so many other progressive regimes: there, great care is taken to ensure that people's thoughts remain legally compliant. No uncontrolled chats. No dangerous memes. Instead: stability, harmony, happiness, and many beloved leaders.

And our European leaders? They merely long for the very same state of affairs. Naturally, they also long for the same tools — only wrapped in rainbows and “values.” Consequently, the vote in the European Parliament has been scheduled so that many Members of Parliament are already on vacation. After all, that's the only way to ensure a majority for love and harmony.

Martin Sonneborn tried to prevent the vote by referring to the Parliament's own procedural rules. What a fool! Naturally, his microphone was cut off after exactly 60 seconds. Entirely in accordance with the rules, of course. After all, you can't let every crank speak the truth for 61 seconds. Parliamentary procedure ultimately exists to protect democracy from... well, democracy.

Madam President! On a point of order under Rule 202. I object to the improper application of Rule 170 in conjunction with Rules 48, 64, and 80. Although this House has rejected chat control twice, it is now being forced through under an urgent procedure before the summer recess. Urgency requires unforeseen developments. Here, everything has unfolded exactly as expected. There is no urgency. Furthermore, the urgent procedure exists only for proposals at first reading. This dossier is in second reading, and Rule 80 explicitly states: “In the event of a conflict, the rules governing second reading shall prevail.” We informed you in writing on Saturday. Your response to the press was: Everything is in accordance with the rules. See the Ukraine assistance vote in 2022. But in that case, the Council had given a written commitment to adopt this House's text. The urgent procedure implemented Parliament's will during a wartime emergency. You are exploiting solidarity with Ukraine in order to undermine the democratic processes of this Parliament...
Martin Sonneborn later wrote on Facebook on July 6, 2026:
Today I tried, single-handedly, to stop chat control.
Over the weekend, Sibylle Berg and I had to inform Parliament President Metsola in writing that forcing chat control through under the urgent procedure unfortunately violates the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament. While Metsola subsequently (incorrectly) told the interested press that everything was perfectly in order, we are still waiting for her reply.
That is why I wanted to explain it to her once again today during the opening session in Strasbourg. And I was rather surprised to discover that the President does, in fact, know the rules: after exactly 60 seconds, she switched off my microphone. (Perfectly in line with the rules, although it is rarely done.)
I still had quite a bit left to say: "Madam President, under Rule 22 you are responsible for safeguarding these Rules of Procedure (waving the printed rulebook) — declare the urgent motion inadmissible. After all, this is not Malta! I'd be happy to hand you the current version of the Rules of Procedure personally. In the MEP bar."
So what happens next? Tomorrow [09/07/2026], Parliament will vote on the urgent procedure, even though this vote should not take place at all. If the motion succeeds, chat control will be put to a plenary vote on Thursday at midday. To stop it, 361 Members of Parliament — a qualified majority — would have to vote AGAINST it.
The bad news: Thursday is the last day before the summer recess, and many MEPs are likely already on their way to their vacations. Anyone who sees something suspicious in this scheduling... well, what a mischievous thought. Smiley!
If chat control passes, the platforms (that is, the US tech bros) will once again be allowed to continue scanning your messages happily and entirely legally. So please make your messages a little more entertaining over the coming weeks... Wink emoji!

Our Beloved Leaders Have No Other Choice

Praise them! Praise Ursula, praise the Commission, praise the EPP, and all the others who, with iron gentleness, are saving this “our democracy.” They truly have no alternative. The people are becoming increasingly unpredictable. They vote the wrong way. They think the wrong thoughts. They write things like “Inflation is annoying” or “Uncontrolled migration is problematic.” Such sentences can evolve into something far more dangerous: disobedience. Protest. Demonstrations. Election results that could shake the power of our many beloved leaders.

After All, This “Our Democracy” Is Built on Trust

On the deep, heartfelt trust between the people and their leaders. But trust without control is like an open bar without a bartender — sooner or later everything ends up in pieces. How quickly chaos could erupt if our many beloved leaders placed too much trust in ordinary citizens! One wrong word here, one critical thought there, and suddenly people begin asking uncomfortable questions about corruption, cronyism, warmongering, vaccine deals, or the next special EU fund. Anarchy, populism, and right-wing extremism would inevitably follow.

That is why preventive educational measures are of the utmost importance in this “our democracy.” The enlightened citizen is best encouraged to educate himself — ideally through a gentle algorithmic hand that reminds him in time which formulations our many beloved leaders would find entirely unacceptable. Those who voluntarily think twice about what is permitted no longer require actual prohibitions.

Chat control, therefore, is not surveillance. It is a digital self-help group for 450 million potential deviants.

The people have always needed protection from themselves. And that, after all, is the highest form of democracy: the leaders know what is best for us. Freedom of thought has always been overrated anyway. It only leads to chaos.

We Need More Freedom from Opinions!

Forward to chat control! For the children — the little ones, and the big grown-up children as well. For this “our democracy.” For a future filled with harmony and love for our leaders.

And if you happen to disagree... feel free to write it in the chat. The AI is reading along and will pass it on. And if someone rings your doorbell at six o'clock in the morning, rest assured that it is entirely for your own good — and for no other reason!



Author: AI-Translation - АИИ  | 

Jeden Tag neue Angebote bis zu 70 Prozent reduziert

Other articles:

Pistorius in Weißenfels: At Last, War Returns to the Heart of Society!

What a glorious day! On June 6, 2026, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius (SPD) will personally visit Weißenfels to show the public just how wonderfully modern, family-friendl... zum Artikel

Childcare Becoming More “Valuable” – City Plans to Raise Daycare Fees

Yes, this truly warms the heart of every family with small children: Childcare in the City of Hohenmölsen’s daycare centers is set to become more valuable – meaning more expen... zum Artikel

If a government does not represent the basic interests of its people, it should be fired

Cross-country car convoy against war Zeitz, August 12, 2024... zum Artikel

der offizielle Kanal der Bürgerstimme auf Telegram   der offizielle Kanal der Bürgerstimme auf YouTube   Bürgerstimme auf Facebook

Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions:
via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12

or via bank transfer
IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719
BIC: SUMUIE22XXX
Account holder: Michael Thurm


Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips   Imprint / Disclaimer