	Deutsch English Français Español Türkçe Polski Русский Rumână Українська العربية



	Home About Contact

Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!

How the State Hunted Critics and Protected Itself - Interview with Martin Schab - The Perin Dinekli Case and the Mask of Corruption

In the process of reappraising COVID policy, a disturbing picture emerges: while former ministers get away with allegations worth billions in nepotism and misallocated spending, critical doctors such as the Turkish-born physician Perin Dinekli continue to be prosecuted to this day.

The Bielefeld law professor Dr. Martin Schwab, who defended her, paints in an interview a devastating picture of the German judiciary and politics. It was never primarily about infection control – but about power, narratives, and corruption at the highest level.

Jens Spahn: Admissions Without Consequences

Jens Spahn, former Federal Minister of Health and trained banker, was the subject of around 170 complaints regarding nepotism and preferential treatment of certain companies in the procurement of masks and protective equipment. The investigations were dropped – there was not even an indictment. Billions of euros “flushed down the drain,” as Schwab puts it, in an obviously irregular manner. At the same time, the state continues to relentlessly pursue critical doctors and scientists.

In the parliamentary inquiry commission on COVID review on December 15, 2025, Spahn made remarkable admissions: the vaccines never had the goal of providing protection against transmission (protection of third parties from infection). 2G rules, vaccination mandates in institutions – all justified with the argument of protecting others, which Spahn himself now relativizes. In parliament in 2021, he had still urged vaccination on the grounds that it would also protect others. A clear contradiction, which Schwab describes as a lie.

Even more explosive: The vaccines are “still being tested on the market today” – an admission that corresponds with RKI protocols. The approval studies were incomplete, the placebo groups dissolved. Instead of revoking approvals, the EMA issued conditional authorizations with questionable justifications. Schwab sees this as a “completely uncontrolled experiment” on the general population. It was about corruption and framing, not science.

The Case of Perin Dinekli: Political Persecution of a Doctor

Perin Dinekli, a 65-year-old physician of Turkish origin, musician, human rights and peace activist, was charged with issuing mask exemption certificates. The allegation under § 278 of the German Criminal Code: issuing false health certificates without adequate physical examination. She was denounced – among others by Jenny Haas (“Stand Up Against Racism”), who posed under a false name and described symptoms in order to provoke her. Haas later admitted that the symptoms had been fabricated.

Schwab, her defense attorney in parts of the proceedings, dissects the indictment legally:

Mask exemption certificates are not classical “health certificates” within the meaning of § 278 StGB (systematic interpretation: not an official offense, but a general offense). The paragraph dates back to the Nazi era and originally referred to examinations related to prostitution – a questionable precedent for today’s mask exemptions.
No mandatory physical examination: Telephone sick notes were explicitly introduced in 2020 to relieve medical practices. Court rulings (e.g. Higher Regional Court Frankfurt 2006, Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf 1956) confirm that an “examination by a physician” does not always have to be physical. Medical reports (e.g. COPD cases) or psychological trauma (flashbacks after rape) are sufficient as a data basis. Medical therapeutic freedom was ignored.
Mask mandate itself illegal: Schwab argues that the mask mandate was a “from start to finish illegal attack on bodily integrity” (Article 2 of the Basic Law) in legislative form. Many masks were off-label use (not approved for virus protection), studies showed harm. The state harmed citizens under the guise of protection – a normative conflict with medical professional regulations and the Geneva Declaration. Courts systematically refused to address this debate.

Searches of Dinekli’s premises massively violated medical confidentiality. Witnesses and experts (such as Prof. Werner Bergholz on mask-related harm) were rejected. The judiciary, influenced by media-driven panic reporting, showed no professional distance. Schwab speaks of “henchmen of an agenda.”

Double Standards and Framing

While Spahn was effectively exonerated (investigations dropped), doctors who protected patients from allegedly harmful measures were labeled as “COVID deniers,” “Querdenker,” or even Nazis – regardless of their origin or biography. The denunciation by an “anti-racism activist” against a Turkish-born doctor underscores the hypocrisy of the framing. Critics were driven into exile, into suicide, or into silence.

Schwab criticizes the perversion of constitutional doctrine: fundamental rights were transformed from defensive rights against the state into mere “duties of protection,” branding every citizen as a potential source of danger. Self-defense against state measures? Unthinkable for many judges.

Preloaded Institutions

A genuine judicial review of COVID policy is still pending. The institutions are “heavily preloaded,” as Schwab says. The Dinekli case stands symbolically for thousands of persecuted doctors, police officers, and citizens. It is a scandal that the state uses paragraphs from darker times to pursue its critics, while those responsible for billion-euro misjudgments and broken promises remain untouched.

The mask has fallen. What is revealed underneath is not infection control – but a system clinging to its own narratives, at the expense of fundamental rights and trust in the rule of law. Time for real accountability, not further cover-ups.

Author: AI-Translation - АИИ |

Jeden Tag neue Angebote bis zu 70 Prozent reduziert

Other articles:

The system grabs the next dissident – Peace pianist Arne Schmitt arrested in the courtroom

Berlin pianist and activist Arne Schmitt was suddenly arrested in the courtroom on September 3, 2025, during his twelfth day of appeal proceedings.... zum Artikel

Just being against the AfD is not enough! Slogans are not solutions

Last Friday, September 26, 2025, the AfD invited people to a rally in Naumburg.... zum Artikel

ENFORCEMENT THREAT – Is City Council Chairman Ekkart Günther Broke?

There’s troubling news from Weißenfels. It appears that the chairman of the Weißenfels city council, Ekkart Günther, is facing serious financial problems. A letter from his la... zum Artikel

Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions:
via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12

or via bank transfer
IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719
BIC: SUMUIE22XXX
Account holder: Michael Thurm

Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer