|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
 Rescue Operations in Burgenlandkreis: Drastic Increase of 17 PercentThe number of rescue operations in Burgenlandkreis has increased by up to 17% in recent years. What could be the causes of this? ```html A report from Berlin prompted me to inquire about similar numbers in Burgenlandkreis. In Berlin, SPD member of parliament Robert Schaddach requested the number of Berlin fire department deployments due to heart problems and strokes. There, the numbers had risen drastically – even among younger people. I asked Burgenlandkreis whether I could also receive such figures from the district – preferably broken down by weeks, diagnoses, and age groups, and ideally for the past 10 years. The press office of Burgenlandkreis responded that no such detailed data is available. I only received the following totals. Apparently, during the worst pandemic since the Spanish flu, collecting more precise data was abandoned.
Anyone will certainly notice that the number of rescue operations in 2022 increased drastically not only compared to the terrible flu year 2018 but also compared to the severe pandemic year 2020. It is also reasonable to assume that many more cases occurred that were not quite as acute, where those affected went to their general practitioners or emergency rooms themselves. I recently came across an interview with the mortician Marlies Spuhler, discussing the official death statistics in Germany. These were also compared with the flu year 2018. Irregularities in this area have only appeared since the introduction of the "vaccination" against the coronavirus. Since then, significantly more people have died in Germany. The linked video above was deleted from YouTube, and the entire YouTube channel was recently terminated, allegedly for violating terms of use. So censorship continues. Who exactly is against freedom of speech and certain truths? I know the claims of pandemic enthusiasts, supporters of measures, and vaccine idolaters who would argue, based on such numbers, that the increase in rescue operations clearly proves how dangerous the virus is. Or, of course, it can only be "Long Covid." The fact that "Long Covid" strangely appeared mostly after the vaccinations in quite a few cases is ignored or also attributed to the virus's danger. If I were to ask why the number was so low in 2020, the answer would be that it was because the measures in 2020 were so successful – lockdown, distancing, and masks. According to the RKI files, there is no evidence for the "protective effect" of FFP2 masks. The protective effect of surgical masks is likely even less. Supporters of the measures conveniently ignore that then-Health Minister Spahn declared in autumn 2020 that with the knowledge available today, hairdressers and retail would no longer be closed. That would not happen again. He knew lockdowns had not helped. Shortly afterward, however, this knowledge was forgotten, and new lockdowns followed. The goal was clear: to vaccinate until the needle glows. I would also argue that from late 2021 and early 2022, many events required 2G and 2G+ rules as protection against the virus. Mask-wearing – sometimes even FFP2 – was also mandated. A current negative test was required because vaccination alone was not trusted to provide enough protection. But that was not enough either because masks had to be worn in addition. Thus, the combination of these health protection measures did not lead to keeping or reducing the number of rescue operations to the levels of the pandemic year without vaccines or the flu year 2018. Strange, isn’t it? Pandemic enthusiasts, supporters of measures, and vaccine idolaters of the more aggressive kind would by now be throwing insults around. For them, it is almost inconceivable that the "vaccination" could have made people sick in such large numbers. They would claim the virus was just as dangerous in 2022. Well, since December 2021, Omicron has been the dominant virus variant, which Wikipedia states: "The Omicron variant causes a disease of lesser severity in adults." I consider other statements on Wikipedia questionable, aside from the "vaccine effectiveness," which from the start obviously wasn’t very good. There would have been no need for first, second, third, or fourth boosters if the "highly advanced vaccines" had actually been effective. So why has the number of rescue operations risen so drastically? The population hasn’t increased to the same extent. People have not aged by decades within one or two years and become more vulnerable. What could explain that the health protection measures had not a positive, but undeniably a negative effect on health and also provably cost lives? I know I’m considered by many to be a nutcase, a conspiracy theorist, a lateral thinker—and yes, I also think outside the box here because the narrative’s explanations make no sense to me. More plausible to me are those things revealed by defamed and censored experts. Namely, that the production of spikes triggered by the "vaccines," which the immune system then develops defenses against, can last for years. It is now known that the "vaccines" do not remain only at the injection site. It is also known that the immune response targets those cells producing these spikes. It is known that these can be blood vessel cells, destroying blood vessels and leading to strokes, heart attacks, and thromboses, among other effects. Effects that can appear with a corresponding delay suddenly and unexpectedly. One would think it important to investigate these matters thoroughly, collect appropriate data to understand the actual causes. Every positive test was quarantined; every contact was traced to impose quarantine if necessary. Investigate what caused the rescue operations in Burgenlandkreis...? Umm...? Who Bears the Responsibility?For topics like this, I always ask myself about responsibilities. In the district, it is certainly the district administrator (vaccination center, vaccination teams, vaccination propaganda, pandemic panic, measures to exclude and punish all who refused compliance), but also the district council members. Their task is also to question and review the district administrator’s actions. Always! Even during a "pandemic." The same applies to directives from the federal or state governments. See: Local self-government according to Basic Law Article 28.Here we also know the arguments of those responsible—or the one argument: "They could not have known better." In my view, this is just a pathetic attempt to shirk responsibility. Are citizens allowed to use the same excuse at every opportunity? Driving too fast: "I didn’t know better!" Not paying taxes: "I didn’t know better!" Murdering someone: "I didn’t know better!" In such cases, it’s always said: ignorance is no excuse, and citizens should have known better. If you truly don’t know, you are still responsible. There were enough experts who knew better. Many people out there knew better. How critics were treated in this democracy should have shown every upright democrat that something is wrong. Censorship should have been an alarm signal. How quickly the focus was put on vaccination at a time when there was no vaccine yet should have raised suspicion. Anyone could have read with a few clicks that developing new medicines takes 6, 8, 10, or even 15 years until side effects are mostly eliminated, if the substances ever get that far and all further testing isn’t stopped due to complications. The website of pharmaceutical research companies mentions 13 years. In 2020, I wondered if the "pandemic" was really going to be maintained for 6, 8, or 10 years until any vaccines were tested according to the medical standards used before Corona to protect health and save lives. The fact that contracts with vaccine manufacturers were kept secret should have shocked every democrat. Citizens pay billions for these "vaccines" but are not allowed to know the contractual terms? That’s like buying a car without seeing it first, without knowing the details, and without any guarantee that it actually runs. Nobody would do that. Regional politicians could therefore not only have known better, but due to many undemocratic actions and contradictions, they had to know better. They should have questioned. They should have demanded logically comprehensible answers. A Possible ConsequenceA true review is certainly not to be expected from those who imposed and enforced the measures during the "pandemic" and supported it all. No responsible person will take responsibility. Maybe the best way is for those who act irresponsibly to lose their responsibility.Local elections are also coming up in early June. It is therefore up to the voters to decide whether those who were ignorant—perhaps because they wanted to be ignorant—should be confirmed in office to approve appropriate preparations and measures for future pandemics. Or whether these positions should be given to those who have difficulties with "blind obedience," who question, who say no, and have proven that they stand ``` Author: AI-Translation - Michael Thurm | vor dem 01.07.2024 |
|
| Other articles: |
 | The Origin of the Raven Island near Weißenfels - Reese and ËrnstHow was the Raven Island formed and why does Reese have a secretary?... zum Artikel |
 | A Total Catastrophe Is Being ProducedInterview with Hans-Günther Koch, co-organizer of the Monday demonstrations / walks... zum Artikel |
 | DISASTER REPORT! Burgwerben Ravaged by Locusts!A black cloud of destruction has struck Burgwerben. Within minutes, fields and even a freshly slaughtered pig were completely devoured. Are we witnessing the end of the world?... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |