Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
Coup against fundamental rights - No scientific freedom at the RKI - COVID inquiry commission in BrandenburgIt was a historic moment of openness – or rather: of exposure. On March 27, 2026, in Potsdam, a senior politician admitted what critics of COVID policy had been claiming for years, backed by evidence from the released RKI protocols: it was not science that determined the measures. Politics made the decisions. And “science” was merely decorative window dressing. Tobias Dünov, State Secretary in the Ministry for Science, Research and Culture of Brandenburg, put it with remarkable bluntness: the RKI is not an independent research institution, but a higher federal authority bound by instructions. The minister may dictate what the RKI has to say and communicate. Academic freedom? That, he said, is a misunderstanding. Anyone seeking free science should not apply to the RKI. With this, a government representative officially confirmed what many had dismissed as conspiracy theory: the entire COVID policy was not “following the science,” but a political power game in which the RKI served as a compliant instrument. The scandal of the inquiry commissionIn the Brandenburg inquiry commission on the review of COVID measures, a rare, almost liberating debate took place. Affected people from the hospitality sector, retail, and cultural scene described the destruction of their livelihoods. One entrepreneur reported losses of €300,000, family businesses on the brink, city centers dying due to arbitrary closures. The 2G and 3G rules, the cultural lockdown – all measures that were not only economically devastating but, according to experts such as Julia Neigel, also in violation of international law.The singer and human rights advocate Julia Neigel spoke plainly: it had been a “diffuse coup against fundamental rights.” The complete exclusion of unvaccinated people from cultural life and the blanket lockdown of culture were incompatible with higher-ranking law – international conventions on the right to cultural participation. Angela Merkel’s notorious statement, “Culture is not part of basic services,” was not only cynical but also unconstitutional and in violation of international law. Politics before science – the RKI as an obedient executorMost shocking was the openness with which Dünov described the power relationship. The scientists at the RKI were allowed to have their opinions – but in the end, politics decided, and the RKI was expected to present the desired line to the public. The RKI protocols document exactly this: internal warnings, doubts, and differentiated assessments were suppressed or reworded to support the government’s hard line.AfD MP Lars Hynig and others consistently demanded clarification: where was the balancing of interests? Which concrete numbers – not the notorious “rubber figures” like incidence values without a meaningful denominator – were used as a basis? Why was an entire country shut down, even though initially only 13 cases (some asymptomatic) were known in Brandenburg? Why were hospital beds simultaneously reduced while an artificial “state of emergency” was created, sacrificing culture and hospitality? Marcel Bartz pointed out the fundamental methodological problem: policy relied almost exclusively on secondary sources and models that supported its own narrative, rather than hard primary data (hospital occupancy, actual excess mortality, etc.). The result was a policy of panic and blind obedience. Sweden as an embarrassing contrastThe comparison with Sweden repeatedly came up, where the independent Anders Tegnell did not lead a directive-bound authority but was able to act according to evidence-based principles. The result: no total lockdown, significantly fewer collateral damages – and no collapse of the healthcare system. In Germany, by contrast, criticism was defamed, dissenting opinions were excluded, and “follow the science” became the mantra of an authoritarian policy.Professor Gert Antes, a pioneer of evidence-based medicine, spoke of a massive asymmetry: while publicly preaching “following the science,” critical voices were systematically ignored and “chattering scientists” (quote Christian Drosten) were brought under control. Power hunger and controlThe statements made in the Brandenburg inquiry commission constitute a devastating verdict on the COVID policies of federal and state governments. They show that it was never primarily about protecting health, but about power, control, and enforcing a narrative. Fundamental rights were suspended on a massive and often arbitrary scale, while hiding behind an alleged “scientific consensus” that was in reality politically dictated.The RKI was not an independent guardian of science, but an extended arm of the Ministry of Health. Anyone who still denies this today is either lying or has not understood the protocols and the statements by Tobias Dünov. The investigation must continue. Those responsible must finally be held accountable – legally, politically, and morally. What happened here was not an accident. It was an attack on the constitutional order of this country, disguised as “protection of the population.” The Brandenburg inquiry shows: the truth is coming to light. Slowly, but inexorably. And it is devastating for those who lectured, constrained, and ruined us for years. Author: AI-Translation - АИИ | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Tagesschau in Rescue Mode: German Tax Money for Bike Lanes in Peru – and Any Doubt Is Fake News!44 million euros for bicycle projects in Peru – and woe to anyone who asks why our own roads are falling apart! Tagesschau jumps in to save the day, declares everything a "climat... zum Artikel |
 | Thank-You Speech from Federal Chancellor Friedrich Merz to Donald Trump and Benjamin NetanyahuSome honest words from the much-loved Chancellor of Hearts, Friedrich Merz, right?... zum Artikel |
 | Only 30 Billion Investment for the Energy Transition for the Burgenlandkreis – District Buys Land in MauritaniaThe energy transition continues to be an important topic for politics because the climate must still be protected and global warming must be stopped. In a few days there will be a ... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |