Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
Resignation of District Administrator Götz Ulrich (CDU)? - Prof. Stefan Homburg presents further evidence: There was no COVID pandemicIn his video from May 3, 2026, Prof. Stefan Homburg summarizes the COVID years using three largely unknown graphs. Even a district administrator should have been able to recognize this. 
The information presented by Professor Stefan Homburg in his video is unlikely to please many pandemic enthusiasts, supporters of restrictions, vaccine idolizers, and members of the Götz Ulrich fan club. Homburg once again proves: there was no pandemic! “Pandemic” in three images: Prof. Stefan Homburg sharply criticizes COVID policyProf. Stefan Homburg concludes that there was never a medical emergency, but rather a deliberate campaign of fear based on PCR numbers that had little to do with actual illnesses and deaths.1. Severe acute respiratory infections (SARI)The first graph shows the actual severe respiratory diseases recorded by the RKI, which are based on clinical reports independent of test results. These “cold waves” follow a clear seasonal pattern with peaks in winter.
Homburg highlights three points: the strongest waves occurred in March 2018 and at the end of 2022 – i.e. before and after the major COVID panic. The year 2020 was unremarkable. The decline of the wave in spring 2020 began already weeks before the lockdown. The lockdown neither prevented exponential growth nor accelerated the natural decline, but instead merely caused damage. 2. Mortality in GermanyThe second graph shows weekly deaths. Here too, there is a strong seasonal pattern with winter peaks. The highest points are again in 2018 and 2022.
In 2020 there was no excess mortality. Age-adjusted mortality was within the range of previous years and therefore normal. However, politics counted every deceased person with a positive PCR test as a “COVID death” and suggested these were additional to normal deaths. In reality, the so-called COVID deaths were on average 83 years old – exactly like the other deceased. 3. The 7-day incidence (PCR numbers)The third graph forms the core of Homburg’s criticism. Looking at the entire period, it becomes clear that incidence had nothing to do with actual illnesses or deaths.
A tiny increase (incidence around 50) led to the first lockdown. At a roughly 50 times higher incidence of about 2000 in spring 2022, nothing happened anymore: shops and schools remained open, and the numbers disappeared from the news. The shift coincided with the beginning of the war in Ukraine. Homburg speaks of systematic manipulation: every positive test was counted as a “case,” even in asymptomatic individuals. To artificially keep incidence high, later even positive rapid tests were counted like PCR tests – contrary to WHO protocols, as Homburg demonstrates with excerpts from talk shows featuring Karl Lauterbach and Saxony’s health minister Köpping. Combination of graphs and RKI protocolsBy overlaying SARI and mortality data with PCR numbers, the “morbid manipulation” becomes evident: severe respiratory diseases and deaths remained within normal ranges before, during, and after the “pandemic.” The high incidence figures were purely a product of testing and counting, used to spread fear and distract from the lack of clinical data.
Particularly explosive are internal RKI protocols showing that the institute early on recognized that SARS-CoV-2 was not widely circulating and that the end of the flu season had been reached. Nevertheless, these findings were withheld internally in order to politically justify lockdowns and school closures. Corona totalitarianismHomburg sees the COVID measures as a form of totalitarianism, in which normal seasonal cold waves were reinterpreted as a supposed emergency. He criticizes politics, authorities, media, and many scientists for supporting this line. He is less interested in motives than in actions and their consequences for the population.Resignation of District Administrator of the Burgenlandkreis Götz Ulrich (CDU)The question that should now be asked of the district administrator of the Burgenlandkreis, Götz Ulrich (CDU), is: when will he resign?These data could and should also have been obtained by the Burgenlandkreis health department. The health department should have checked what the actual situation regarding severe respiratory diseases in the district was. The district administrator should have made his decisions based on facts and evidence. Regulations such as those he issued for the Burgenlandkreis lack any basis. The people in the district would have been spared a great deal of stress, suffering, and effort. Instead, the district administrator apparently saw himself only as an executing agent of federal and state politics. He did not act in the interest of those he is supposed to represent, but in the interest of those who simply wanted to exercise power. Those who apparently wanted to test how far this “game” could be pushed. Whereby the goal was clearly the so-called vaccination. A mass vaccination or a test of substances on the market (as former Federal Minister of Health Jens Spahn described it), which had not gone through the usual approval procedures. The district administrator actively supported and implemented this “game.” He coerced people and had violations of regulations punished with fines. The consequence that would at least follow from this would be his resignation. Because he has proven that the people in the district are not his priority, but rather the directives from above. But we can probably rest assured. The Götz Ulrich fans do not need to worry that their beloved district administrator will step down. Because his resignation would be an admission and could also lead to resignations in other districts. Even mayors would have to follow suit. Because they also had municipal employees cordon off playgrounds and patrol towns and communities to enforce regulations. New elections across the entire country would be necessary. So that it does not come to that. So that there is no state crisis, the much-loved district administrator will do what he announced in the district council: if his actions have consequences, he accepts them. That simply has to be enough. It is also not to be expected that a majority for his removal will be found in the district council, especially since parts of the council members are mayors of the towns and municipalities in the district and share the same CDU party membership as the district administrator. District Administrator Götz Ulrich (CDU) will continue to be neededFederal and EU politics are busily preparing for an open war with Russia. Rearmament, conscription, expansion of the Bundeswehr, military exercises with Russia as the enemy, provocations. Russia as an enemy image is being built up more and more. In the background, many things are happening that people are not yet learning from the news.In the Burgenlandkreis, a loyal henchman will therefore be needed in the future who does what is required of him: issue regulations that restrict citizens and support warmongering. Of course, against the interests of the people in the district. Author: AI-Translation - АИИ und Michael Thurm | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Great Success: Helios Clinic Shuts Down!Who would have thought? The decisions of the widely beloved former Federal Health Minister Karl Lauterbach are finally bearing fruit.... zum Artikel |
 | The Nature of the So-Called Democrats – An Example from the Saalekreis District CouncilWhen the wrong people approve the right thing, the right thing suddenly becomes wrong.... zum Artikel |
 | Political Dangers of a “Neutral” Authority – The Classification of the AfD by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution in May 2025On April 28, 2025, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) published its long-awaited report on the AfD and now officially classifies the party as confi... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |