Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
The Big Scam: How the government is ripping us off with a ridiculous sugar tax – and ruining our health in the process€450 million from the planned sugar tax is supposed to “stabilize” the ailing public health insurance system, which swallows over €500 billion per year? A joke. In reality, the population is getting fatter, sweeteners are making people sicker, and the state is cashing in – while further interfering in our refrigerators. Maurice Klag and the facts from the UK and the WHO expose the fraud. 
The sugar levy: A pure extortion model by the federal governmentThe federal government is planning a levy on sugar-sweetened beverages starting in 2028. Health Minister Nina Warken (CDU) and her predecessors solemnly promise that this will not only relieve statutory health insurance (GKV) by around €450 million per year, but also serve prevention. In over 100 countries, they claim, sugar consumption has fallen and manufacturers have adjusted recipes. Sounds good? It isn’t. It is pure deception and fraud – a bureaucratic money-extraction scheme that neither protects health nor significantly slows the exploding healthcare costs of over €500 billion annually. The health insurers spend more than €1 billion per day, and a measly €450 million per year is supposed to make a difference? That’s not even pocket change. It’s outrageous.Maurice Klag broke this down with surgical precision in his video: The minister doesn’t even know exactly how the levy will be implemented technically – maybe 8 cents for a can of Red Bull, 10–11 cents for a Coke. But one thing is clear: it is not about health. It is about collecting money and interfering in citizens’ private choices. Eating sugar directly by the spoon or stirring kilos into tea? No problem, no tax. But a can of cola from a manufacturer? That’s where they strike. Classic nanny-state mentality: the citizen is too stupid, the state knows better – and cashes in heavily in the process. The British disaster as a blueprintLooking at the United Kingdom, where the “Soft Drinks Industry Levy” was introduced in 2018, we see the real outcome. The government there wanted to reduce sugar consumption and combat obesity.What actually happened?Sugar consumption from beverages fell by 23.5% in children and 40.4% in adults – sounds impressive at first. But in terms of energy intake, that’s a ridiculous reduction of just 12 to 28 kilocalories per day. About 1% of recommended daily energy intake. A joke. At the same time, consumption of heavily sweetened soft drinks overall exploded by 21.3%. The industry simply reformulated: high-sugar drinks (>8 g/100 ml) dropped from 27% to 10%, while the low-sugar variant (up to 5 g, tax-free) increased by 65%. Result: people are not drinking less, but more of the “light” versions – often loaded with artificial sweeteners. And overall consumption of sweet drinks increased.Obesity ratesAmong adults, from 60.8% (2015) to 61.4% (2022). Among children aged 10–11, from 33.2% to 36.6%. The population became fatter, not slimmer. The sugar tax achieved the opposite of what was promised. SIPCAN sums it up accurately: the measure failed to achieve its goal. Instead of less obesity, there are more sweeteners in almost 88% of the beverages studied and higher overall consumption.Sweeteners: the hidden health bombAnd here it gets truly insidious. Because the tax exempts sweeteners (non-sugar sweeteners, NSS), manufacturers have massively switched to them. The WHO has published a clear document on this – exactly what Maurice Klag refers to.In the short term, sweeteners may help with weight loss (fewer calories), but long-term the picture is bleak: higher BMI, increased risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and even higher overall mortality. In children, there are hardly any long-term benefits, except possibly slightly less tooth decay in some studies. Particularly alarming: in pregnant women, higher sweetener consumption is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth. Where is the warning label on Coke Light or Zero for pregnant women? Missing. Many people use these products precisely during pregnancy or gestational diabetes – believing they are doing something good. Science says: the opposite is true. The WHOThe WHO therefore explicitly recommends not using sweeteners for weight control or prevention of non-communicable diseases. No long-term benefits, potential harms. Yet politics is pushing exactly this substitution. Sugar is evil, sweeteners are the “healthy” alternative – a scientifically disproven nonsense that journalists and politicians still repeat like a mantra.The real scandal: state arrogance and incompetenceThis sugar levy is not health protection, but state paternalism at the expense of citizens. It creates new bureaucracy, drives up prices, rewards industry for clever reformulations with sweeteners, and ultimately delivers neither noticeable relief for health insurers nor better health. Instead, more diabetes risk, more heart problems, and potentially more preterm births – financed by taxpayers.Karl Lauterbach used to cite every WHO recommendation like gospel. Where is he now when the WHO warns about the long-term risks of sweeteners? The current and previous governments are playing the same game: using symbolic policies and cash grabs to mask their own failures in fiscal and health policy. Instead of addressing the real causes of obesity – lack of exercise, dietary culture, processed foods overall – citizens are being nudged with a tiny tax on a single product. It is the same state that experimented with questionable measures during the pandemic and now once again believes it knows better what ends up in our glasses. Enough! The evidence from the UK is clear, the WHO data is public, and five minutes on Google is enough to see through the deception. This sugar levy is not progress – it is another chapter in the book of government-approved public deception. Anyone still believing in the good intentions of politics should look at the obesity numbers from the UK. Or simply listen to Maurice Klag’s analysis. The facts are clear: the tax does not make us healthier. It only makes the state richer – and the citizens potentially sicker. Author: AI-Translation - АИИ | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Combat-ready instead of peace-capable? – When the warning from history falls silentA memorial, a renamed street, and a commemoration that conceals more than it remembers. While politicians call for rearmament, a former Rehmsdorf resident raises uncomfortable ques... zum Artikel |
 | 250 Mondays of Resistance – 5 Years of Vigil in front of the RKIFor five years, Oliver Herde has been standing tirelessly every Monday in front of the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin. For 250 Mondays, through heat, rain, snow, and wind, his vig... zum Artikel |
 | How Dangerous Free Thinking Can Be - Flag Ceremony in Aschersleben Led by Director Colette RinkA remarkable event of a special kind kept the quiet coziness of Aschersleben’s residents on edge on October 28, 2024, as the steadfast Director Colette Rink, during the evening f... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |