Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! |
||
No one intends to expropriate! – The Ulbricht 2.0 in Burgenlandkreis? – How the IKIG project could still put farmers in the “sell or lose” dilemmaWhile the IKIG association happily logs €121.5 million of taxpayers' money and dreams of “high value-added” robots and chemical companies, they reassure affected property owners with an earnest expression: Expropriation? Never! Yet precisely at the moment when AfD district council member Sven Jähnig asks the crucial question on March 30, 2026 – what happens if land prices skyrocket? – the answer turns into a classic political platitude. The parallel to Ulbricht's famous 1961 lie is alarmingly apt. The Million-Euro IKIG Project and the Unpleasant CalculationBurgenlandkreis, Weißenfels, Lützen, and Hohenmölsen want to build a gigantic inter-municipal industrial and commercial zone at the A9/B91 highway junction. The project sponsor is the IKIG association. On March 30, 2026, the district council discussed an information document that assigns the district a share of €121.5 million of the total budget – initially, up to €277 million had even been discussed. The approval notice had already been issued on March 13, 2026. The plan is to attract “high value-added companies,” vaguely referencing “current developments in the chemical industry” and “humanoid robots.”So far, it sounds like typical structural change rhetoric. But then it gets concrete – and expensive. The Question No One Wanted to HearSven Jähnig (AfD) asked the only logical question in the district council: Have the actual purchase prices of the required plots been considered? And what happens if owners – boosted by high lease prices for PV and wind farms – demand significantly more than the expert-determined “fair prices”?Jähnig calculated: The land acquisition alone could cost between €7.5 million and €98 million at realistic market prices – money that would then be missing for development and infrastructure. And if the sellers refuse to cooperate? Then – as feared – “other options” might be considered. In other words: expropriation. The Answer That Says Everything – and NothingAndre Zschuckelt responded on behalf of District Administrator Götz Ulrich (CDU) with the usual mix of bureaucratic language and reassurance:> Prices would be determined “according to expert judgment.” > Everything will be transparent and coordinated with the development bank. > Expropriation? “It is not our intention to expropriate there, as might have been the case until 1989.” > Those who do not want to sell, their decision will be respected. No legal grounds for expropriation. Sounds reassuring. Until you read between the lines. Because this exact wording – “It is not our intention” – is the modern version of Ulbricht's famous lie “No one has the intention of building a wall.” It can later be conveniently reinterpreted. If the project threatens to fail due to skyrocketing land prices, if the €121.5 million suddenly isn’t enough, and funders apply pressure, then “not our intention” quickly becomes “unfortunately no other choice.” The history of structural change in East Germany is full of such “unfortunately no other choice” moments. The Bitter Reality for OwnersFarmers and landowners in the affected area face a classic dilemma:> They can sell at “expert-determined” prices – far below what they could achieve on the open market through long-term leases to photovoltaic or wind farm operators. > Or they refuse to sell. Then the project stalls – and political pressure rises. No one wants to be responsible for a failed prestige project involving €121.5 million of district council money. The temptation to then pull out the expropriation clause from the building code (“overriding public interest”) is obvious. And compensation? As is well known, it is based not on the dream lease prices of the energy transition, but on the “market value” – exactly what the experts conveniently set low. Trust is Good, Oversight is BetterThe officials in the IKIG association and district office may still honestly believe that expropriation is “not even on the table.” But the numbers don’t lie. Competition on the land market is brutal. Budgets are tightly calculated. And the political logic of structural change has only one goal: The project must be pushed through at any cost.Affected farmers and landowners should not be lulled by sweet words. History shows: Once the wall is built, it’s too late to rely on yesterday’s promises. “No one intends to expropriate.” Remember this sentence. It could soon become very expensive. Author: AI-Translation - АИИ | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | The system grabs the next dissident – Peace pianist Arne Schmitt arrested in the courtroomBerlin pianist and activist Arne Schmitt was suddenly arrested in the courtroom on September 3, 2025, during his twelfth day of appeal proceedings.... zum Artikel |
 | Divide and Rule – Max Didn't Get ItThere was quite a stir in Bad Dürrenberg. Usually, on Mondays, only those who have been demonstrating for years for peace, freedom, democracy, and human rights—strongly critical... zum Artikel |
 | Polish Incitement at Demo: Are People in Germany Stupid?On May 15, 2025, a few of those fearless fellow citizens gathered once again – the ones still not aligned with government policy. Once again, they were demanding peace – and de... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |