Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! |
||
Climate Apocalypse: Mitteldeutsche Zeitung in Panic Mode? - Google AI Refuses Question About Greenland IceA little fun is a must, that’s my motto too. And online, especially on social media, you can always have fun with the friends of climate panic. 
Shortly after publication, someone posted the Mitteldeutsche Zeitung article with the headline If Europe’s biggest heater fails, cold winters in Saxony-Anhalt will be the least of our problems. Luckily, the article is behind a paywall, because the way it begins, it’s probably meant to create fear and panic. Would my heart even be able to take that? The core message could probably be that we must reduce CO2 emissions so that it gets colder on the planet again, because if it doesn’t get colder on the planet, the Gulf Stream would collapse, and then it would get colder in Europe and Germany. We’re having a comparatively normal winter again, and yet warnings are issued about atmospheric warming. The film “The Day after Tomorrow” is referenced. Anyone who knows the movie knows the story: within days the Northern Hemisphere freezes because the Gulf Stream suddenly came to a halt. “Gulf Stream collapse” or “Ice age despite climate change,” as the MZ calls it. Recently, the YouTube algorithm suggested a video to me about old maps. Specifically, it was about a map of Greenland in which cartographers had drawn long fjords or even a passage across Greenland. Trees were also stylized on the maps. Well, okay, several hundred years ago there were no satellites capable of photographing and measuring land surfaces from space. But if those mapmakers weren’t completely letting their imaginations run wild, then such maps at least suggest that there might not have been quite so much ice and snow in Greenland back then. That is, long before industrialization, which according to the climate-panic narrative could lead to global warming and the melting of Greenland’s ice, which would stop the Gulf Stream and make Europe and Germany cold. I briefly wanted to ask Google’s AI, Gemini, when Greenland had been largely ice-free in the past 2,000 years. The AI wrote to me: "This conversation isn’t for me. On topics that may be inappropriate or unsafe, I can’t help you. Let’s talk about something else." I repeated my question. The AI did not respond again. In the video, it is speculated that there are no maps showing Greenland’s topography without ice in order to maintain certain narratives. If you do a quick search online, however, you’ll still find something. According to that, Greenland is not a single large landmass, but consists of several large and many smaller islands. 
So what do we do with this finding? Dismiss it as crackpot nonsense? Or could it be that there actually were times when Greenland had less ice, yet the Gulf Stream didn’t collapse back then? On Klimafakten.de one learns that it actually was warmer in Greenland once. That was during the Medieval Warm Period, which nowadays is apparently called the “Medieval Climate Anomaly” so that such changes are not viewed as normal. According to Klimafakten, Greenland was partially ice-free 400,000 years ago. Temperatures in Europe are also said to have been mild back then. Regarding the Gulf Stream, which according to climate-panic rhetoric would come to a halt if current temperatures rise, it says: “Marine Isotope Stage 11 (MIS 11), a pronounced warm period about 424,000 to 374,000 years ago, was characterized by an exceptionally strong and persistent circulation of the Gulf Stream system (and the entire Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, AMOC). Despite relatively weak orbital solar radiation (insolation), this strong northward heat transport produced the longest and one of the warmest interglacials of the past 500,000 years.” So the Gulf Stream flowed along happily despite an ice-free Greenland and provided a mild climate. That would therefore be the opposite of the prophecy that is currently supposed to push us toward combustion-engine bans and abandoning gas. How will the climate-panic crowd deal with this information? Reflect on it? Probably not! Because if the beloved leaders say it will be bad, then it will be bad — unless we pay more taxes and fees and give up prosperity. In any case, Google’s Gemini didn’t communicate with me anymore. Maybe it got too hot?  Author: AI-Translation - Maximus Polemikus | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Suddenly he's far-right! Sven Schulze: The CDU man striking AfD tones! Anyone receiving citizen's income must work!In a recent interview with "Bild am Sonntag," Sven Schulze, the newly sworn-in Minister President of Saxony-Anhalt (CDU), presents himself as a confident problem-solver for his sta... zum Artikel |
 | Is the Citizen Lacking in Intuitive Intelligence?The city council meeting on Thursday, November 7, was a charged atmosphere—many decisions were sought, but few questions were answered.... zum Artikel |
 | Manfred’s Fact Check: Cold Reckoning Instead of Willing PeaceThe Examiner’s Pose: How Manfred Dissects Peace to Destroy It... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |