Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
How One Man Recounted Time – Backgrounds, Errors, and ConsequencesWhen we write the year 2026 today, most of us do not think about why exactly the year 1 AD begins where it does, or whether it even corresponds precisely to a historical event. The setting of this year is a fascinating mix of faith, calculation, political interests, and cultural mediation – a step that shaped Western chronology forever. 
Dionysius Exiguus: The Man Behind the CalendarDionysius Exiguus, a monk in the 6th century, lived in Rome and was tasked with calculating the date of Easter. In doing so, he encountered a problem: the date of Easter varied from year to year, and previous systems were based on Roman calendars or the regnal years of emperors.Dionysius decided on a radical step: he set a “year of Jesus’ birth” as the starting point of chronology. His aim was less to document the exact birth of Jesus than to establish a unified, Christian-oriented calendar system. The year in which Jesus was supposed to have been born thus became Year 1 – and all years before it were counted “before Christ.” A Calculation That Missed the MarkToday, historians know that Dionysius was off by about four to six years. The reasons for this are understandable.The biblical data were vague: The Gospels mention Herod the Great, the census under Quirinius, and other events only within rough time frames. Unclear historical synchronizations: Imperial dates, censuses, and political events are preserved only in fragments. Practical simplification: Dionysius wanted a functioning system, not a historically perfect chronology. The result: Jesus’ birth likely falls between 7 and 4 BC; the year 1 AD marks a symbolic, but not exact, beginning. Historical Sources and Their LimitsFlavius Josephus, a Jewish historian of the 1st century, is considered one of the most neutral sources on this period. He was not a Christian, wrote about Jewish history from a Roman perspective, and mentions Jesus, John the Baptist, and James almost in passing – without miracle stories.Other sources, such as Roman chronicles or administrative documents, provide only fragments. Everything we can reconstruct today about the exact date arises from texts, chronologies, and partly contradictory traditions. The Determination Had Several Motives:Uniform calendar for Easter: Dionysius wanted to standardize liturgical planning.Christian identity: By beginning chronology with Jesus’ birth, Christianity was symbolically elevated to the center of history. Cultural transformation: The step marked the transition from a Roman-Jewish sense of time to a Christian-shaped chronology that endured for centuries. The Shift of the Birth Year Led to Some Intriguing ConsequencesHistorical confusion: Herod was probably already dead when Dionysius set the year 1; Quirinius’ census took place later.Calendrical consequences: Easter was determined for centuries based on this starting point – long before scientific chronology was developed. Cultural persistence: Despite the inaccuracy, Western chronology still follows the Anno Domini system today. Dionysius’ Calculation May Have Been Inaccurate, but It Was Practical and Culturally AstuteIt created a shared frame of reference beyond local rulers or regional calendars.It set a sign of continuity that fostered Christian identity. It made history “measurable” – a concept that still shapes Western culture today. Historically speaking, it was not decisive whether the dates were exact, but that people could develop a shared perception of time. A Year That Made HistoryYear 1 is less a historical fact than a symbolic turning point. Dionysius Exiguus laid the foundation for a calendrical order that had an impact far beyond his lifetime. Historically, Jesus’ birth may lie a few years earlier. Humanly and culturally, the determination was a milestone: it linked faith, calendrical practice, and social order.Chronology is therefore not just mathematics, but also history, culture, and faith in one. The number “1” became more than just a date – it became a symbol for the beginning of a new world order, originating from a small but significant figure from Galilee. Sources & References: Dionysius Exiguus, De ratione paschali, 6th century Flavius Josephus, Antiquitates Judaicae E. Schürer, History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ, 1890 R. E. Brown, The Birth of the Messiah, 1993 Author: AI-Translation - Karla Kolumna | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Europe at a Crossroads: A Letter on War, Freedom, and Independent ThinkingMy head is full, fuller than during my final exams, my body suffers from an emotional blockage: too much anger wanting to break free, too little love surrounding me.... zum Artikel |
 | Protect youth? Abolish freedom! – Social media ban under 16 is really an attack on anonymityWhy the social media ban under 16 is really an attack on anonymity – and why politicians want it... zum Artikel |
 | Monday Demo in Zeitz on February 12, 2024: Renewed Call for SolidarityThis video summarizes the last Monday demo in Zeitz on February 12, where farmers, truckers, craftsmen, and all people threatened in their livelihoods stood united. At the Altmarkt... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |