Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! |
||
All Corona fundamental rights restrictions unconstitutional! All Corona vaccinations illegal!What Jens Spahn's statements in the Bundestag's Enquete Commission legally mean. 
Dear Community, Jens Spahn made the following statements in the session of the Corona Enquete Commission of the German Bundestag on 15.12.2025: 1. The COVID vaccines are "still, in a sense, being tested on the market today." This aligns with the statement in the protocol of the Corona crisis team at the RKI, according to which data on the COVID injection are only to be collected post-marketing. 2. "It was never the goal, not even for the WHO, that vaccine development – that it would lead to protection against infection for third parties." This legally means the following: 1. The 2G rules as well as the sector-specific vaccination proof or vaccine tolerance obligations lacked any legal or medical basis. And Jens Spahn, as the then responsible Federal Minister of Health, knew this. All fundamental rights restrictions to the detriment of people without COVID injections were therefore unconstitutional and, in particular, not covered by any discretionary scope of the executive. Because if the executive did not even pursue the goal of transmission protection, it was not allowed to base the Corona rules on the hypothesis of such transmission protection. 2. Vaccine information provided by the vaccinating doctor was only correct if the vaccine candidate had previously been informed that there were no valid clinical data on safety and efficacy, and that these data had to be collected afterward – in plain terms: that the individual vaccine recipient himself contributes to the generation of safety and efficacy data by receiving the injection, in other words, he is a test subject. This information was likely provided only in very rare cases. 3. All complications caused by the COVID injections were, at a minimum, knowingly accepted by Jens Spahn from the beginning. This is the legal definition of conditional intent. The issuance of 2G rules, of course, Jens Spahn left to the state governments and, at the federal level, to the traffic light coalition. It will need to be examined to what extent Jens Spahn can nevertheless also be held legally responsible for the COVID vaccination damages. Best regards, Yours sincerely, Martin Schwab
Author: AI-Translation - Martin Schwab | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | City Councillors: Because They Don’t Want You to Know What They’re Doing!The city council meeting in Weißenfels on November 7, 2024, was in parts quite strange. One might even say it was indicative of the current situation in Germany and the "understan... zum Artikel |
 | Overland Convoy Zeitz: Peace Actions Expand in BurgenlandkreisOn Monday, October 14, 2024, one of the regularly organized overland convoys took place again in Burgenlandkreis. As usual, the protest march started from Zeitz, a town that has be... zum Artikel |
 | Monday Demonstration in Zeitz for the Farmers’ Protest on Monday, January 8, 2024To kick off this year’s Monday protests, we launched a major Monday demonstration in Zeitz with 65 tractors, trucks, and utility vehicles, as well as many other cars, after aroun... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |