Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
Sloppiness in the District Administration – Whitewashing in the Minutes?Another issue became apparent during the district council committee meeting on September 8, 2025: the minutes apparently do not really reflect the facts. 
At the beginning of a district council committee meeting, the accuracy of the minutes of the previous meeting must always be decided upon. On September 8, 2025, Sven Jähnig (AfD) argued that the previous minutes did not correspond to the facts. The minutes stated that the previous meeting had ended without further questions. But Sven Jähnig contradicted this. In his view, many questions had remained open. As a committee member, one has the opportunity to submit such inaccuracies in writing so that they can be corrected. However, Sven Jähnig did not do this – and immediately came the objection from Ms. Wötzel from the administration: “Too late!” Sven Jähnig justified his failure to submit by saying that he did not have the lifetime to correct such minutes in a way that would be acceptable to the other committee members. The incident is documented in this video: From Ms. Wötzel’s objection, one can infer that the administration apparently has no real interest in correcting obvious errors in such minutes. Legal requirements such as missed deadlines are immediately invoked. Mistakes in the meeting minutes are therefore supposed to remain. From another source, I learned that even in municipal councils, meeting minutes are often “whitewashed.” It seems more important not to present discrepancies as such, but instead to record “peace, joy, pancakes.” But then what are such minutes even worth if they do not reflect the facts, but rather what the administration or such committees would like to have recorded? Considering this, it also becomes clear why the district administration finds it so difficult to allow committee meetings to be recorded on video. Because then there would be video evidence that could contradict the minutes. On the other hand – as some may know from their own experience – when citizens provide information in documents, applications, tax returns, etc. that, upon closer inspection, turn out not to be entirely accurate (one can also be mistaken or simply make errors), the administration often accuses them of intent. Author: AI-Translation - Michael Thurm | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Resignation of District Administrator Götz Ulrich (CDU)? - Prof. Stefan Homburg presents further evidence: There was no COVID pandemicIn his video from May 3, 2026, Prof. Stefan Homburg summarizes the COVID years using three largely unknown graphs. Even a district administrator should have been able to recognize ... zum Artikel |
 | The Great Hypocrisy Show: The West Votes Against Anti-Racism – and Germany’s State-Funded “Civil Society” Looks FoolishThere are moments when political reality becomes so grotesque that you can only endure it with popcorn.... zum Artikel |
 | Dear Father and Dear Mother! - Sabine Saupe reads a letter to her parentsIn this moving letter, Sabine Saupe reflects on the loss of German identity and culture as well as the current political situation. She calls for a renewed awareness of history and... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |