|
|
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
| Home About Contact | ||
![]() |
Tagesschau in Rescue Mode: German Tax Money for Bike Lanes in Peru – and Any Doubt Is Fake News!44 million euros for bicycle projects in Peru – and woe to anyone who asks why our own roads are falling apart! Tagesschau jumps in to save the day, declares everything a "climate protection miracle," and labels critical questions as conspiracy theories. Fact-check or propaganda? The electorate must not doubt, only nod.
In recent months, the German government has struggled with almost no other development aid project to communicate its purpose to people in our country as much as with the bike lanes in Peru. And because the "dumb electorate" refuses to grasp the life-saving message from the government's official communication channels, the publicly funded enforcers have to step in again: A "fact-check" by Tagesschau on 26.08.2025 complains: "More false claims about bike lanes in Peru": https://www.tagesschau.de/faktenfinder/entwicklungshilfe-radwege-peru-100.html The key messages of this "fact-check" are: - The project is not terribly expensive after all. The 315 million circulating online simply isn't correct. The grants amount to just 44 million euros, the rest are loans, and these do not relate to bike lanes but to public transport infrastructure projects. - And the project is soooo useful, because an integrated transport concept with bicycles and public transport can ensure mobility for the people of Peru at affordable prices. And this also protects the climate. Well, that should be worth a grant of 44 million euros to us, right? The additional loans we provide don’t count, since we will get them back eventually. Surely. So, dear taxpayers, don’t listen to fake news and evil conspiracy theories on alternative media channels. Trust the official statements of authorities and reporting in quality media. What follows after the Tagesschau gong is nothing but the truth. Understood? The only problem is that the "fact-checker" does not ask the crucial question (which is probably why people doubt the sense of German tax money investments in bike lanes in Peru): Why on earth are we investing millions in infrastructure projects in other countries while our own road and rail infrastructure gradually decays? How many German roads could we repair for 44 million euros? And how many for 315 million euros? But anyone who asks such questions is surely racist and a Nazi-right-wing-reich citizen. Comments: Peter Patzak Hmm. 44 million for a few hundred meters of road painting. How is that supposed to make sense? Were our experts flown in especially, with overnight allowances and so on? Κυρία ΆρτΚο Whether the 315 million euros figure is correct or not is secondary considering the numbers the 'fact-checker' throws around, since he babbles about still 200 million euros, of which 'only' 44 million euros is 'development aid,' for 'climate protection,' etc., for these bike lanes in Peru, while 'the rest' will supposedly be repaid,... We recall 1983, when Franz Josef Strauß granted the GDR a billion-D-Mark loan(!) and disbursed it, otherwise the GDR would have had to declare state bankruptcy. Strauß averted this. With the agreement that the SED would repay this loan. However, I cannot recall that the SED repaid even a penny by 1989/1990. Rather, after the GDR joined the FRG (raising the question whether it was more the FRG joining the GDR...), hundreds of millions of D-Mark of SED state capital, not East Marks, disappeared into the void. The SED presumably stood up calmly with these hundreds of millions and renamed itself "PDS". That's a note on 'loans' given to other countries in Absurdistan. And in general, these so-called 'development aids' must finally be stopped or at least significantly reduced. Because a state whose infrastructure is increasingly decaying, whose social system is about to collapse, etc., has no business granting 'development aid' while its own country is being eroded. These 'development aids' are, for example, still given to China! Such aid is also still given to India, although India can spend billions of euros/dollars on rockets! These 'development aids' are also given to countries from which our 'dear guests' invade Germany. In this regard, the taxpayer pays twice: 1.) 'Development aid' to the respective country and 2.) the permanent support of these invaders from Germany’s social funds; these invaders have never paid a cent into social funds and never will. And they don’t even have to -> permanent support. What amuses me almost incidentally is that the public broadcasters are now dealing with 'NIUS'. Explicitly. A big cat would probably sense a great fear of 'NIUS',... Juri Müller Did Peru repay the last loans? Oh wonder. They were forgiven. The same will happen with these loans as well. The money is simply gone.
Author: AI-Translation - Martin Schwab | |
|
| Other articles: |
![]() | Raiffeisenbank Must Repeat General Assembly? - The Problem Is Homemade! - Reader’s Letter and AnalysisThe last general assembly of the Volks- und Raiffeisenbank Saale-Unstrut eG on June 25, 2024, didn’t make headlines in the daily press this year. Why? Is fundamental transparency... zum Artikel |
![]() | Fighting for Democracy with Convicted Criminals – or: Because They Don’t Know What They’re Quacking About!Why do some rather extreme characters online ally themselves with criminals and crank up the volume to agitate against the opposition?... zum Artikel |
![]() | Uprising of the Corona Convicted: Petition Demands Amnesty and Reckoning with the StateA current petition to the German Bundestag calls for an amnesty for all those prosecuted or convicted in connection with government COVID-19 measures.... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |