Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
Lawyer Got into Trouble with His Party CDU – How “Our Democracy” Works When No One Disrupts ItOnce upon a time, there was a country that proudly called itself “liberal-democratic” – at least as long as no one asked too loudly what that actually meant. 
Once upon a time, there was a democracy – supposedly. In Stuttgart, it recently became evident how things really stood with basic rights, the rule of law, and inner-party freedom of opinion. What was once a principle had become a burden. And a lawyer who was simply doing his job became the scapegoat of a system that had long since sacrificed its ideals in favor of opportunism. The Scandal: A CDU Lawyer Who Took the Constitution SeriouslyReinhard Löffler, CDU politician and long-time member of the state parliament, had done something that used to be considered honorable: He defended a defendant who had been massively defamed in public – Michael Ballweg, founder of the Querdenken movement. But because Ballweg was deemed “controversial,” Löffler’s defense suddenly became a liability for his own party.As Apollo News reported, Löffler said: “I was willing to help him [Ballweg] because I believe the state cannot handle critical opinions and therefore prefers to go through the judiciary. I never supported Ballweg politically, but wanted to contribute to freedom of expression.” The District Board as Inquisition TribunalWhat did the CDU do with a member who stood on the ground of the constitution? They dragged him before an internal party tribunal. A meeting of the CDU district board took place in an Italian restaurant in Stuttgart-Zuffenhausen, where Löffler was confronted – under the pretense of a “friendly exchange.” Reality looked quite different.As Apollo News revealed in a second article: “Several local chapters of the Stuttgart CDU district association reportedly signaled that they would no longer support Löffler as a state parliament candidate – because of his legal representation.” CDU district chairman Markus Mörseburg tried to downplay it as a “collegial discussion,” but the political subtext was clear: Whoever defends the wrong person is on the wrong side. Freedom of Expression with an Expiry DateIn a democracy, the right to legal defense should apply regardless of political leanings. Not so in the Stuttgart CDU. There, a legal stance turned into a partisan issue. Löffler further stated: “I would defend Ballweg again. I would also defend a left-wing radical if I had the impression that state power was being used against him in an unjustified manner.”But instead of recognizing this stance as a sign of commitment to the rule of law, Löffler was publicly dismantled. Not by political opponents, but by his own party colleagues. Democracy as a Stage ShowWhat happened here was not pluralism of opinion, but a small-scale political purge. The party that calls itself Christian and democratic revealed its true face: principles – yes, but only if they don't harm the image. Professional ethics – sure, just not for the “wrong” people. And freedom of expression? Only as long as it stays internally compatible.In this “our democracy,” apparently you could say and do anything – as long as it didn’t contradict the prevailing narrative. Löffler’s case was a bitter example of how quickly the rule of law can turn into its opposite when moral panic meets party-political fear. Today, defending the constitution requires a backbone. Author: AI-Translation - Американский искусственный интеллект | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Drawing Attention to Problems - The Citizens’ VoiceNo, this is not self-praise – or is it?... zum Artikel |
 | How Many Pandemics Would You Like in the Next 5 Years? – Opening of the mRNA Competence Center in HalleOn June 3, 2024, a new mRNA Competence Center was inaugurated in Halle (Saale) at the biotech site of the chemical and pharmaceutical corporation Wacker, in the presence of Science... zum Artikel |
 | Landmark Ruling: Court Protects Free Debate on COVID Measures – Criticism of Corona Is Not Holocaust Trivialization!After my last post on a ruling by the LG Wuppertal apparently spoiled some readers’ mood, I now report on a case in which both the LG Bremen and the OLG Bremen showed sound judgm... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |