Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
Dialog Preventers Call for Protest - Real Satire in BraunsbedraI don’t know how others feel, but I can only shake my head again and again when self-proclaimed defenders of democracy publicly show their undemocratic side. 
Specifically, it’s about the fact that the AfD Saxony-Anhalt has invited people to a citizens' dialogue on July 7, 2025, at 7 PM at the Restaurant & Bar "Vier Seen" in Braunsbedra. Announced are Martin Reichardt (Member of the Bundestag for the southern Saalekreis and the Burgenlandkreis), Dr. Maximilian Krah, and Kerstin Przygodda (also Members of the Bundestag). These two gentlemen and the lady – judging by her name, possibly with a migration background – want to engage with the citizens and find out where the shoe pinches.
Show textOur next citizens' dialogue will take place in the beautiful #saalekreis. In addition to myself, Kerstin Przygodda and Dr. Maximilian Krah will also be present as speakers. We look forward to seeing you 💙 #citizensdialogue #afd #braunsbedra #homeland #germany #invitation The group "Merseburg for Diversity and Civil Courage" seems to have a big problem with such democratic processes. For them, it’s clear: The AfD is "right-wing extremist" – because Jochen Hollmann, head of the Saxony-Anhalt Office for the Protection of the Constitution, stated this in the current constitutional protection report. That the Office for the Protection of the Constitution is not an independent agency but is subordinate to the Interior Ministry and therefore cannot be considered neutral, should be generally known.
Show text"The greatest #danger to #democracy here comes from the largest #rightwingextremist party, the #AfD in Saxony-Anhalt." (Jochen Hollmann, head of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, on June 24, 2025, during the presentation of the new VS report Saxony-Anhalt). I myself have repeatedly tried to conduct video interviews with those who champion diversity, tolerance, solidarity, and democracy. So far, either no response has been given, or the dialogue has been openly refused. These "democrats" are now taking it a step further – from dialogue refusal to dialogue prevention. That is certainly not democratic. What would be democratic is an exchange of substantive and factual arguments – in other words, entering into an open dialogue. This naturally does not mean that one must adopt the other’s opinion. It’s initially about understanding the other and recognizing their intentions. The next step could then be to find common solutions or compromises. The result can also be that everyone sticks to their position. But in a diverse and tolerant democracy, that should be possible – or shouldn’t it? However, those who refuse dialogue or even actively prevent it clearly show that it’s not about exchange but about demarcation – and ultimately about division. Author: AI Translation - Michael Thurm | 27.06.2025 |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Immaturity Coupled with Megalomania and Stockholm SyndromeIt is a privilege of youth to speak freely and unburdened—unburdened by life experience and free from expertise.... zum Artikel |
 | LEGAL VICTORY AGAINST BIONTECH - Public statement by Katharina KoenigTopic: Success of the law firm Rogert & Ulbrich – Why are mainstream and independent media remaining silent about the landmark ruling in Aurich?... zum Artikel |
 | Black-Green Meeting in the Burgenland District – Optimism Versus FirewallAs part of his summer tour, Felix Banaszak (Greens) stopped at the Monastery of St. Claren in Weißenfels on August 5, 2025.... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |