Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
The Federal Ministry for Truth and Propaganda invites you: Demonstration for AfD ban in MerseburgWelcome to the new Federal Republic of Germany, the land of double standards and moral arrogance. The command center of political correctness – in this case, the alliance “Merseburg for Diversity and Civil Courage” – is calling for a major rally under the slogan “Ban the AfD now!” on May 19th at Entenplan in Merseburg. The motto: If you’re not with us, you’re a Nazi – and in the future, you won’t be allowed to vote or be elected. Who needs political opponents when you can just ban them? 
Of course, the organizers cite the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution – the new political sword in the fight against everything that deviates from the sacred consensus of the ruling parties. The “expert report” classifying the AfD as confirmed right-wing extremist has now made its way into numerous alternative media outlets. Anyone who takes a look is left rubbing their eyes in disbelief: a wild collection of Facebook posts, tweets, Telegram messages, and generously interpreted statements – but not a single criminally relevant act. Just unwelcome opinions, political rhetoric – and apparently a growing voter base that rubs the establishment the wrong way. But that’s already dangerous enough. Remember the so-called “secret meeting of Potsdam” – blown up by the media into something like a Wannsee Conference 2.0, the republic was flooded with anti-right-wing demonstrations. For weeks, there was outrage, demands, and agitation. And what was left in the end? Hot air. Just political opponents listening to the “wrong” people – and according to the “diversity” standard, that alone is considered an attack on democracy. This concept of democracy has also been experienced firsthand by critical voices on Facebook. Under the call for the Merseburg demonstration, I shared the above video, which calmly and understandably explains why the constitutional protection report stands on legally shaky ground. The reaction from “Merseburg for Diversity and Civil Courage”? Deletion. Comment gone. Follow-up transparency post: They tolerate no content from “alternative media,” no “fake news” – in other words: no dissenting opinion. Next time, they said, accounts will be blocked. Diversity!? – but only within the narrow range of our approved uniformity. Particularly bizarre: The self-proclaimed democrats of today seem to see no contradiction in silencing speech, wanting to ban parties, and simultaneously calling for “civil courage.” During the protest on April 28 in Bad Dürrenberg against so-called “conspiracy theorists” – meaning: people with different opinions – I was even blocked from seeing the stage when I tried to film the speakers. Dialogue? Nowhere to be found. The “diverse” had no interest in exchanging even a single word with the supposedly dangerous dissenters. Discourse is out, exclusion is in. What’s being presented here under the banner of tolerance, democracy, and diversity is in truth a moralistic cleansing campaign. Those who don’t fit into the worldview of these self-righteous virtue guardians are marked, deleted, blocked – and soon perhaps simply banned altogether. Welcome to Merseburg, where freedom of speech only applies to the “correct” opinions, and “civil courage” means clapping on command. The irony of history: Those shouting “Ban the AfD now!” today shouldn’t be surprised if tomorrow they’re the ones being banned. Because whoever bans opinions instead of countering them has already lost democracy – no matter how often they claim to defend it. One can’t help but wonder whether the organizers of this real-life satire are even aware of what they’re actually doing – or whether they’re trapped in an ideological frenzy that clouds all self-reflection. As they pat each other on the back for their “civil courage,” they stand on a public square and seriously demand the ban of a democratically elected party – as if that were the logical pinnacle of liberal values. The fact that this very behavior – the exclusion, defamation, and sidelining of political opponents – is otherwise covered in history books under authoritarian regimes, seems either unnoticed or has already been reinterpreted as a virtue. Who needs satire, when political reality has long become its own parody? Author: AI Translation - Michael Thurm | 15.05.2025 |
|
| Other articles: |
 | This Cannot Go On! - Open Declaration for Peace - Stop Billions for Arms, War, and Military Aid. For Fair Politics - For Our HomelandThomas Gens, Mayor of the Island of Hiddensee, writes an open letter to the German Bundestag and the Chancellor.... zum Artikel |
 | A Mammoth Project Right on Our Doorstep – What is the IKIG? – Invitation to an Information EventDATE POSTPONED TO NOVEMBER 22, 2024. On the upcoming Sunday, November 17, 2024, the Citizens’ Initiative Burgenlandkreis and the Na... zum Artikel |
 | We Don't Want to Become Synchronized ZombiesElmar Schwenke / Peter Lemar ist Autor, Journalist und Musiker. Er spricht über seine Erfahrungen insbesondere in den Jahren der P(l)andemie und wohin die Reise gehen könnte / wi... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |