|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
District Administrator Götz Ulrich seriously ill? Is he still able to perform his official duties?I raised three reminders to the District Administrator during the district council meetings. I received a response from him personally for two of them. But what did my inflamed eyes have to read?!  During the district council meeting on May 5, 2025, I reminded everyone that I had submitted a written objection to the oral prohibition of video recording during the district committee meeting the previous October. A letter was indeed sent to me with a legal assessment and some rather incoherent rambling from the Legal and Regulatory Office – but this was clearly not a formal notice of objection. Yet that’s exactly what I had requested, and one has a legal right to receive such a notice. Why does District Administrator Ulrich not acknowledge this right? Especially since he had justified the recording ban by claiming he was strictly bound by legal requirements. In this case, he is clearly not adhering to them. What’s going on? Some may say: “This is just nitpicking.” But I must respond that in law and administration, the specific wording is often crucial. If I request a formally issued administrative act or an official notice of objection, then an assessment by the Legal and Regulatory Office simply doesn’t meet that standard. The second reminder concerned my question about when the necessary conditions would be created so that all parents can fulfill their legal duty of accompaniment in schools – for which the district holds responsibility – and what that would look like in practice. District Administrator Götz Ulrich referred to “our response” dated April 10, 2025, stating that legal requirements are developed and adopted by the federal or state government. The Burgenland district could only influence this to a limited extent. But that wasn’t my question. I explained this again during the district council meeting. On May 5, 2025, I repeated my question: I was asking about the spatial requirements. The legal regulations are already clear. Attending school is part of the parental duty of support. The Burgenland district’s social welfare office, acting on behalf of the social agency – that is, the state of Saxony-Anhalt – has often been especially strict in this regard when it comes to denying integration assistance for a child with a disability or terminating it in the middle of the school year. Besides, the federal government is not responsible for school operations. Education is a matter for the states. Therefore, the federal government is not required to pass laws – especially not ones that determine how parents may be present in class, how they may sit, or anything like that. A senior administrative official like the District Administrator should be aware of this. His reference to the federal government seems rather confused to me. Is District Administrator Götz Ulrich suffering from Auditory Processing Disorder (APD) or even from auditory agnosia or Wernicke’s aphasia?That seems quite possible if he is cognitively unable to process spoken words and therefore does not act appropriately. These disorders are described as follows: “The person hears sounds or speech but cannot correctly assign or understand them. They hear speech, but cannot recognize or interpret it. They can often speak fluently, but their speech lacks content or is incomprehensible, and they have great difficulty understanding spoken language.”Is he even capable of carrying out his official duties anymore?If District Administrator Ulrich already struggles this much with such matters – what about more complex issues? Is he still able to perform his official duties without error? Would a comprehensive examination of his cognitive abilities be appropriate? Should we be concerned? Is such a disorder curable? And if so, how long would treatment take?Is this the "Administrative Middle Finger Syndrome"?If it turns out that the much-loved District Administrator is actually in full possession of his mental faculties, then the situation obviously takes on a different meaning. In that case, one would have to assume that District Administrator Ulrich is deliberately acting unlawfully and is intentionally failing to answer specifically posed questions. Instead, he delivers – in many words and neatly packaged in writing – his extended middle finger. Which would be worse?But let’s not paint the devil on the wall – right? Maybe it really is just auditory processing disorder (APD). Author: AI Translation - Michael Thurm | 15.05.2025 |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Against the German-Russian Hostility – Bridge Lighting on the A9 – A Different Symbol on German Unity Day and Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s SpeechWhile the official celebration of German Unity Day took place in Schwerin, where Chancellor Olaf Scholz delivered a speech praising German democracy and freedom, a very different a... zum Artikel |
 | Masterpiece of Minimalism: Helge Bauer Writes to buergerstimme.netThere are messages that deeply move us as editors, challenge us linguistically, and test the creative boundaries to the core. Then there are emails like the one from Helge Bauer. N... zum Artikel |
 | Lawless Zone BurgenlandkreisHow should it be interpreted when the district administrator participates in demonstrations against the right-wing, against the AfD, warning of terrible conditions that could arise... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |