Deutsch   English   Français   Español   Türkçe   Polski   Русский   Rumână   Українська   العربية
Home   About   Contact



Never Again War in Burgenlandkreis - Where Are the Regional Politicians?


On Wednesday, November 6, 2024, a peace rally will take place on the market square in Weißenfels – a call to politics and society to leave war behind and actively advocate for peace. Under the motto “Never Again War,” the well-known peace activist Reiner Braun will speak as a guest. The central message of the event is: “Weapons do not create peace; they kill daily.” Yet, while such peace rallies have gained significance across Germany in recent years, local politics often remains conspicuously absent from these events – a stance that raises questions and sparks critical discussions.



The Silence of Politics – A Lack of Positioning?

The absence of local and regional political representatives at events like this peace rally is, unfortunately, not a new phenomenon. With a few exceptions, politicians tend to steer clear of initiatives advocating against war and for disarmament. Why this distance from peace initiatives? For many critics, this reluctance is more than a mere scheduling issue – it reflects a deeper indifference or even deliberate disinterest. When politicians barely participate in such events, it signals that peace and disarmament are not high on their agenda, despite growing public demand for security and stability.

It almost seems as if political decision-makers are afraid to identify too closely with the themes of peace and disarmament. After all, doing so could create conflicts with state or federal politics, which may view a peace-oriented approach as obstructive. By consciously ignoring such events, politicians indirectly reinforce the impression that peace counts for little in realpolitik – unless it can be instrumentalized to advance their own interests.

Who Profits from War?

War and armament are lucrative businesses for certain interest groups and companies. The arms industry is one of the most powerful sectors globally and has a vested interest in maintaining or escalating tensions. Arms companies exert significant pressure on politicians to ensure that defense budgets not only remain steady but ideally increase. In this spiral of mutual dependence, both political actors and industries benefit: one side secures influence and capital, while the other gains justification for expansive military budgets.

While peace activists like Reiner Braun advocate for disarmament, reality often tells a different story: arms exports are booming, military alliances are strengthening, and new conflict zones are created by politics faster than old ones can be resolved. The peace rally in Weißenfels is a call to become aware of this reality and critically question the role the political establishment plays in this system.

Fear as a Political Control Tool

Politicians know that fear is a powerful tool to control populations and push through measures that would never be accepted without threat scenarios. In a world constantly shaped by crises – whether military, economic, or climatic – a sense of insecurity among the public creates room for political maneuvers that would otherwise face resistance.

Increases in military spending are often justified with national security and defense. In the face of “external threats” – whether real or staged – citizens are willing to accept restrictions they would deem unacceptable under peaceful conditions. This tactic allows politicians to boost defense budgets while fostering acceptance for controversial laws or measures that curtail civil liberties. By keeping the population in a state of latent fear, they are more likely to tolerate militaristic and restrictive policies.

The Geopolitical Power Struggle – Peace as an Obstacle?

Another aspect is the geopolitical advantage that many state leaders derive from military conflicts. International power struggles are often waged not through diplomatic means but through military presence and intervention. Powerful states secure strategic resources and influence by supporting conflicts in certain regions. These geopolitical interests often take precedence over humanitarian considerations, making peace an obstacle when it obstructs their power ambitions.

The absence of politicians at peace events is thus also a sign that the geopolitical interests often operating in the background are simply incompatible with the values of the peace movement. Politicians are aware that peace-oriented positions could jeopardize spheres of influence and destabilize the system of military and political power exertion.

Peace Movements as a Counterforce

Given these complex entanglements between politics, the arms industry, and geopolitical interests, the role of peace movements becomes all the more critical. The peace rally in Weißenfels offers the public a platform to speak out against militarization and arms race policies. It serves as a reminder that war and weapons can never resolve conflicts but only cause further suffering.

The fact that local politicians often stay away from such events may feel discouraging, but it should also serve as a wake-up call. Citizens have the power to increase pressure and repeatedly emphasize that their priority is peace – regardless of the economic or political interests of those in power.

Why We Need More Peace Rallies

While politicians remain silent and defense spending continues to rise, the peace movement sends a clear signal: people are ready to stand against war and the arms frenzy, demanding real solutions for a peaceful future. Events like the peace rally in Weißenfels highlight that the longing for peace is alive in society.

Such rallies are a vital contribution to raising public awareness and increasing political pressure. Peace is not just an ideal but a necessity that should be a political priority. The absence of regional politicians at these events shows how little interest they have in what the public wants. It also reveals how much regional politics must adhere to “directives from above,” unable to act independently in the interest of citizens – or perhaps unwilling to do so. I don’t think that’s a good thing, as regional politicians are elected by citizens, not by state or federal politicians – right?

Author: AI-Translation - Matthias Krüger  |  03.11.2024

Jeden Tag neue Angebote bis zu 70 Prozent reduziert

Other articles:

Citizens Question Martin Reichardt (AfD, Member of the Bundestag, Burgenlandkreis, Saalekreis)

The team behind Bürgerstimme presents an 85-minute video interview with Martin Reichardt, AfD member of the Bundestag representing Burgenlandkreis and the southern Saalekreis.... zum Artikel

State Government Threatens Volunteer Work and Traffic Safety

The current situation in Saxony-Anhalt raises urgent questions about the state government’s priorities. The planned massive cuts to traffic safety work, published in the Mittelde... zum Artikel

Day of Unity or Division? Why Politics Has No Interest in Peace!

35 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall – a day of celebration, yet the cracks run deeper. While we remember reunification, wars rage worldwide, and divisions within our socie... zum Artikel

der offizielle Kanal der Bürgerstimme auf Telegram   der offizielle Kanal der Bürgerstimme auf YouTube

Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions:
via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12

or via bank transfer
IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719
BIC: SUMUIE22XXX
Account holder: Michael Thurm


Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips   Imprint / Disclaimer