



	Home About Contact Deutsch English Français Español

Peace Phobia: The Case of Elke Baum and the Fear of Peace

In modern society, we encounter a variety of mental health conditions, some of which are little known yet highly significant. One such phenomenon is so-called peace phobia, a deep-seated fear of peace. This fear manifests itself in extreme defensive attitudes toward peace efforts and symbols. A striking example is Elke Baum, who has drawn attention with her derogatory comments and actions.

Elke Baum referred to the so-called “bridge lights,” a protest action against the government over the highways, as well as the 24-hour bridge lighting on September 19, 2024, on the A9 near Droyßig, intended as a vigil for peace, as “idiot lights.” She also disparaged peace demonstrations, mocking them as an “idiot parade.” In one of her Facebook posts, she even advised: “They should do their idiot lights in Moscow.” These statements indicate more than mere disagreements: they point to a serious psychological blockade against the concept of peace.

The Fear of Peace

Peace phobia, as observed in Ms. Baum, reveals a paradoxical fear of a state that most people see as desirable and aspirational. Peace, which for many symbolizes security, stability, and prosperity, is perceived by those affected by this phobia as threatening. For Ms. Baum, peace seems associated with insecurity, naivety, or loss of control. This fear may have its roots in earlier life experiences.

One possible reason for Ms. Baum’s rejecting attitude toward peace could lie in her childhood. If she grew up in an environment dominated by conflict and tension, peace might appear strange or even uncanny to her. Such environments often teach that strength is defined by conflict or assertiveness rather than compromise or harmony. Peace efforts could therefore appear to her as signs of weakness, leading to deep rejection.

Another scenario might be that Ms. Baum witnessed in her childhood how seemingly peaceful phases were abruptly interrupted by crises or conflicts. This could have led her to associate peace with insecurity and unstable ground. The peaceful phases might have seemed to her like the calm before the storm, fostering distrust toward such states.

Help and Therapeutic Approaches

To help Elke Baum overcome her peace phobia, in-depth psychological therapy is necessary. Cognitive behavioral therapy could aim to question and dissolve her negative thought patterns. It would be important to examine the belief that peace equals weakness and to introduce new perspectives in which peace is seen as a state of strength, security, and prosperity.

Additionally, it might help to work through possible past traumas that shaped her defensive stance toward peace. Psychologists could assist her with targeted trauma therapy to manage the fear of loss of control or instability she associates with peace. Healing peace phobia is a long process requiring patience and intensive therapeutic support.

Is Confrontation with War Helpful?

One might also consider whether a direct confrontation with the reality of war—such as at the front lines in Ukraine—could bring about a change in Ms. Baum’s perspective. The idea would be that by witnessing the brutal reality of war, she might recognize the true benefits that a state of peace brings. Such confrontation could be a kind of shock therapy, helping her see war as the destructive and ruinous force it is.

However, this is an extremely risky and psychologically questionable approach. Participation in a war could cause severe psychological damage and exacerbate existing traumas or fears. A controlled therapeutic setting, where she can gradually reflect on and process her beliefs, would be far more sustainable and less dangerous.

Russophobia as Another Disorder?

Her Facebook remark that the “idiot lights” should take place in Moscow is also noteworthy. This could indicate hostility toward Russia, which might be interpreted as *Russophobia*. It is possible that Ms. Baum has developed not only an aversion to peace but also to specific political actors or nations. Her statements could hint at political or cultural rejection of Russia, possibly intensified by the current geopolitical climate.

It is conceivable that this Russophobia is linked to her peace phobia, especially if she views peace as something connected to weakness or submission. Associating peace efforts with Russia might conjure an image of passive, yielding behavior she vehemently rejects.

Conclusion

The case of Elke Baum strikingly illustrates how deeply rooted fears of peace—i.e., peace phobia—can shape a person’s thinking and actions. Childhood experiences, family beliefs, and societal influences play a decisive role. To help Ms. Baum, careful psychological therapy would need to challenge her beliefs and offer alternative ways of thinking. Confrontation with war might lead to insight in the short term but would be psychologically dangerous and should not be considered a primary method.

Whether Ms. Baum also suffers from Russophobia remains open but could be further explored in therapy sessions. Ultimately, her case offers an important opportunity to reflect on the little-known yet highly complex fear of peace and to develop appropriate support measures.

Supplement

On Facebook, comments followed the above article. Christian Pagel wrote: So the only event dumber than this would be if the idiots were running around in circles again. Zero effect. Do they even know why they stand there? and Elke Baum commented: Christian Pagel, they are all bored..

The comments by Christian Pagel and Elke Baum on the article reveal a clear defensive stance and a tendency to avoid any substantive engagement. Neither addresses the analysis or the psychological theses raised but instead shifts attention to derogatory and cynical remarks about the peace demonstrators. This is a common pattern among people confronted with unpleasant or threatening content: rather than engage substantively, they evade and attack the topic or the participants on a superficial level.

Defense Mechanisms and Avoidance

Psychologically, these statements indicate defense mechanisms that prevent Pagel and Baum from engaging with the core topic—namely the peace movement and the criticism of their rejection of it. This avoidance might express deeper insecurities or fears linked to the theme of peace. Especially for Ms. Baum, whose peace phobia was discussed in the article, it is evident that she continues to make disparaging and cynical comments instead of confronting the possible reasons for her stance. This suggests an avoidance tactic enabling her to fend off unpleasant or threatening emotions.

Minimization and Devaluation

Both comments—especially Christian Pagel’s—downplay the significance of the peace demonstrations by portraying them as pointless and ridiculous (“zero effect,” “the idiots”). This devaluation also serves to defend against deeper engagement with the motivations and goals of the demonstrations. Pagel and Baum devalue the cause of peace because it may be linked to emotional insecurity or internal conflicts they do not want to recognize or process. They distance themselves from the participants by reducing their motivations to boredom and portraying their actions as ineffective and pointless. This kind of devaluation could indicate that they unconsciously feel threatened or challenged by the peace activities.

Peace Phobia and Lack of Self-Reflection

The absence of any substantive engagement with the article also suggests a lack of self-reflection. People with peace phobia often struggle to confront the underlying fears and prejudices that influence their attitude toward peace. Instead, they remain trapped in defense mechanisms that allow them to avoid or ridicule the topic of peace. Their constant devaluation of peace initiatives and their participants suggests that both Christian Pagel and Elke Baum are deeply entrenched in these thought patterns.

Conclusion 2

Overall, the comments by Pagel and Baum reveal a defensive attitude indicating deeper fears, especially peace phobia. Rather than engage with the questions raised in the article and the psychological analysis, they resort to cynicism and devaluation. This stance allows them to avoid reflecting on their own insecurity or fear of peace and dismiss peace efforts as pointless and ridiculous. This underscores the psychological complexity of their defense mechanisms and shows how deeply their negative beliefs about peace and peace movements are ingrained.

Author: AI-Translation - Lucas Schneider | 22.09.2024

Jeden Tag neue Angebote bis zu 70 Prozent reduziert

Other articles:

Lost Property Auction at the Farmer's Market - E-Bike Available for Purchase

The next lost property auction will take place on Saturday, May 17, 2025, as part of the traditional Farmer's Market.... zum Artikel

The Alliance for Diversity and Democracy and the Overland Convoy in Zeitz

On February 22, 2025, at 3 PM, a rally of the Alliance for Diversity and Democracy Zeitz began at the Altmarkt in Zeitz, attended by about 20 local citizens and around 100 people f... zum Artikel

Protest convoy with farmers and demo "Never Again is Now!" in Zeitz on February 11, 2024

On Sunday, February 11, 2024, at 3 PM, a protest convoy started at Zeitz train station, involving farmers, tradespeople, entrepreneurs, and others who feel existentially threatened... zum Artikel

Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions:
via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12

or via bank transfer
IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719
BIC: SUMUIE22XXX
Account holder: Michael Thurm

Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer