	Deutsch English Français Español Türkçe Polski Русский Rumână Українська العربية



	Home About Contact

Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!

Their Struggle - The Self-Disenfranchised Against Diversity and Freedom of Opinion

Despite being lied to, deceived, and betrayed by the ruling politicians, they tirelessly continue to advocate for the very policies that harm them.

On Facebook, there are the usual suspects we’ve occasionally discussed, who have a big problem with me and also with buergerstimme.net. They approve of CSD (Christopher Street Day), attend demonstrations for diversity and democracy, and call themselves democrats. Yet, as soon as something appears on Facebook from people they’ve labeled as “enemies of democracy,” they spring into action. They believe that a militant democracy may resort to dictatorial measures to protect itself. For these brave fighters, this is not a contradiction. During the pandemic years, they rose to agitate on social media on behalf of the government against critics of any kind. And they haven’t stopped since.

They celebrate supposed successes, such as the fact that new registrations of combustion-engine cars in Norway are now only in the mid-double-digit range. They see this as a victory for superior technology. However, they overlook that the Norwegian government has banned new registrations of combustion-engine cars starting in 2025 and that many manufacturers no longer offer such vehicles. The low registration numbers are likely not due to the “superiority” of electric cars but rather the lack of supply and the question of what one might get for a used combustion-engine car in a few years when they are politically ostracized. People, in effect, have no choice but to buy an electric car if they need a new vehicle. Those who celebrate such “successes” are celebrating their own disenfranchisement.

When I post links to articles from buergerstimme.net on Facebook, the government’s champions leave comments beneath them, not addressing the content of the articles but attempting to discredit the website as a whole. As soon as they suspect even the slightest proximity to the AfD, their comments consist only of images expressing their rejection of the party. There’s virtually no substantive response. This might be because they are not only surrounded by reality but because reality can no longer be argued away. When arguments are lacking, insults are hurled. Then I’m called a Nazi, an enemy of democracy, and someone who rejects the rule of law. There’s no evidence for these claims, but that doesn’t bother these government loyalists. The AfD is, of course, the ultimate enemy – alongside Putin, Russia, China, Trump, BSW, Wagenknecht, dieBasis, and many others. Even the CDU is now being targeted, despite earlier this year when they stood side by side with CDU politicians at anti-right-wing demonstrations.

When I occasionally post something from RT Deutsch, such as the recent news that a doctor who had a sign in her practice stating she wouldn’t administer “protective vaccinations” due to the many deaths in her community following Covid vaccinations was fined 2,500 euros, I’m labeled a Kremlin or Putin troll, with comments like: “Good, that miserable lateral-thinking doctor deserved it!” The findings from the leaked RKI protocols either completely passed these Covid devotees by, or they don’t know how to cope with the fact that the politicians they still cling to have consistently misled them.

Every now and then, new allies in the fight against freedom of opinion and diversity emerge, such as “Naumburg for All,” with a nice rainbow-colored logo. In the Facebook group “Naumburger Stammtisch,” they objected to a link to the article “New Postcard Motif for the City” and demanded its deletion, stating: “This post contains only a link to the website of a political association and violates two group rules through self-promotion. ...but I’m sure it could be argued differently.” The fact that this article is entirely apolitical clearly doesn’t matter to this “for all” fighter. It’s the website itself that’s a thorn in the side of those striving for diversity. It must go! Apparently, no one should know this website exists. So, Naumburg isn’t for everyone after all.

What Is This Syndrome Called?

What do you call a syndrome where people advocate even more fervently for politicians who have repeatedly and demonstrably lied to, deceived, betrayed, and restricted their rights and freedoms?

What do you call a syndrome where people champion policies that impose restrictions, increasingly limiting free choice in daily life and freedom itself, without realizing they too must live under these constraints?

What do you call a syndrome where people advocate more intensely for deceitful politicians as their public support wanes?

Artificial Intelligence Would Answer as Follows:

This behavior could be described as a form of “Stockholm Syndrome,” though this term is typically used for kidnapping victims who develop a bond with their captors. More broadly, it could also be termed “cognitive dissonance” or “political blindness.” People who support restrictions imposed by politicians without realizing they suffer under them might also fall under “cognitive dissonance” or “authoritarian submissiveness.” When people advocate more strongly for deceitful politicians as their support diminishes, this is also referred to as “cognitive dissonance” or “Festinger’s reactance” (a combination of Leon Festinger’s cognitive dissonance and Jack Brehm’s reactance), a behavior where individuals cling even more vehemently to their beliefs when they are challenged, contrary to their own interests.

People Who Celebrate Restrictions on Their Own Rights

People who celebrate restrictions on their own rights often experience a complex mix of psychological and social mechanisms that can explain their behavior. Here are some possible explanations:

1. Cognitive Dissonance
When people are heavily invested in a particular narrative, such as the necessity of restrictions to protect a greater good (e.g., safety, health), they may accept or even celebrate these restrictions to reduce cognitive dissonance. Instead of acknowledging contradictions in their beliefs, they adjust their perception to view the restrictions as necessary and positive.

2. Belief in the System or Authority
Many people have deep trust in the political system or the authorities imposing these restrictions. They believe the measures are in their best interest, even if they curtail freedoms. This trust can lead them to not only accept but actively support the restrictions.

3. Social Belonging and Group Pressure
The desire to belong to a particular social group or community can lead people to adopt behaviors and beliefs they might otherwise reject. If the group they identify with supports the restrictions, they will too, to strengthen their sense of belonging.

4. Need for Security
In times of uncertainty and danger (e.g., during a pandemic or political unrest), people may be willing to sacrifice personal freedoms to feel safer. They see the restrictions as protective measures rather than threats to their freedom.

5. Learned Helplessness
When people feel they have little control over their circumstances, they may fall into a state of “learned helplessness.” In this state, they accept restrictions, believing resistance is futile. This can lead them to passively accept or even justify the restrictions.

6. Ideological Convictions
Some people have strong ideological beliefs that lead them to view restrictions on their rights as a necessary price for a higher goal (e.g., social justice, environmental protection). In such cases, they may see personal freedom as less important than the goals they support.

7. Moral Superiority
Some people derive moral satisfaction from supporting restrictions, believing they are on the “right” side. This can create a sense of moral superiority, prompting them to defend and celebrate the restrictions, even if they limit their own rights.

8. Fear of Alternatives
Fear of alternatives to the restrictions, such as chaos, uncertainty, or anarchy, can lead people to accept and support them, even if they curtail their rights. They view the restrictions as the “lesser evil.”

In Summary: People may celebrate their own disenfranchisement because they perceive it as necessary and justified, or because psychological and social factors influence their perception and behavior. They may view the larger goal the restrictions aim to achieve as more important than their individual freedoms.

Dealing with People Firmly Entrenched in Their Beliefs

Dealing with people who are firmly entrenched in their beliefs and may suffer from cognitive dissonance or a similar syndrome can be challenging. Here are some considerations and strategies to help you navigate such situations:

1. Should You Engage with These People or Avoid Them?

Engage: If these people are important to you or if you feel a constructive interaction is possible, it may be worthwhile to engage. The key is to remain calm and respectful.

Avoid: If their actions are personally directed against you and harm you emotionally or mentally, it may be wiser to keep your distance. In some cases, self-protection is more important than trying to convince someone.

2. Is It Worth Discussing with These People?

Context-Dependent: A discussion can be worthwhile if the person is open to other perspectives and willing to listen. However, if they are rigid in their views and unwilling to seriously consider arguments, a discussion may be frustrating and unproductive.

Tactic: If you choose to discuss, focus on shared values or goals. Instead of directly criticizing the person, ask questions that encourage them to reflect on their beliefs. This might help reduce cognitive dissonance.

3. How Can You Show These People They Might Be Affected by These Syndromes?

Reflective Questions: Ask questions that prompt the person to question their beliefs and behaviors. For example: “How do you feel when you realize that politicians you trust don’t always tell the truth?”

Using Analogies: Complex psychological phenomena can often be explained through simple, everyday analogies that feel less threatening.

Pointing Out Contradictions: Without being confrontational, you can highlight contradictions in their statements or actions. This can help make cognitive dissonance more apparent.

4. How Can These People Be Helped?

Patience and Understanding: Change takes time. It’s important to be patient and show understanding for the person’s underlying fears and insecurities.

Positive Role Model: Be a positive example of an open and reflective approach to information. People can learn from others, especially when they see that a different approach leads to better outcomes.

Access to Information: Try to provide the person with access to alternative, trustworthy information. Ensure this information is neutral and fact-based.

Professional Support: In extreme cases where the behavior is highly destructive, it may be worth considering professional support (e.g., therapists) to address deeply entrenched beliefs and psychological mechanisms.

Ultimately, much depends on the person’s willingness to reconsider their views. You cannot force someone to change their mind, but through respectful, patient, and empathetic communication, you can contribute to the process.

Addendum

Jens Rothe commented (effectively as confirmation): Our pandemic troll, Putin stooge, and science denier in his starring role as the “whiner-in-chief.” Nobody needs or reads your mentally deranged drivel. Get over it! Your whining is and remains the helpless moaning of an insignificant and useless quack-thinker. On top of that, you refuse to make your site legally compliant. So, everything a true loser needs to lose.

Author: AI-Translation - Michael Thurm und die KI | 23.08.2024

Jeden Tag neue Angebote bis zu 70 Prozent reduziert

Other articles:

Why the Candles on the Advent Wreath Have Different Colors

A Christmas celebration can be not only contemplative but also enlightening. Just like it was on December 7, 2024, at the Wichtelmarkt in Burgwerben.... zum Artikel

How Do You Destroy People?

Interview with Grit Wagner about her experiences as an organizer of demonstrations by critics of government policies and COVID measures.... zum Artikel

The Little Deer Shone Again Over the Highway

On April 11, 2024, a group of protesters once again gathered on the bridge over the A9 near Lützen to contribute to the nationwide Bridge Lighting event.... zum Artikel

Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions:
via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12

or via bank transfer
IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719
BIC: SUMUIE22XXX
Account holder: Michael Thurm

Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer