



	Home About Contact Deutsch

The Betrayal of Our Children – How Pandemic Politics Doomed an Entire Generation! Child Welfare at Risk!

The decisions made by politicians during the so-called Corona pandemic drastically changed social life, but it was primarily the resulting measures that have had a lasting negative impact on the lives of our children and youth. In a shocking interview, renowned childhood researcher Professor Michael Klundt reveals the devastating consequences of these political decisions—and how the youngest generation had to suffer. What was declared a protective measure often turned out to be a ruthless intrusion into the lives and rights of children. Yet the true scale of this catastrophe was long ignored by politics and the media.

To the Interview / Article „Many Covid Coercive Measures Were Harmful and a Structural Threat to Child Welfare“ with Michael Klundt on Nachdenkseiten

Political Failure: Children's Rights Callously Ignored!

Experts warned early on about the psychosocial impacts of Corona measures on children and adolescents. Nevertheless, decision-makers implemented measures that were often neither scientifically justified nor child-appropriate. Schools and kindergartens were closed, playgrounds locked, sports clubs shut down—all without regard for the long-term consequences for the youngest members of society. The rights to protection, care, and participation were alarmingly neglected.

Professor Klundt condemns these severe interventions into children’s lives as not only irresponsible but in many respects also illegal. Children were forced into a role portraying them as potential threats and had to endure unimaginable restrictions. What was sold as "necessary protection" turned out to be an unprecedented disregard for children’s rights in Germany.

The Psychosocial Damage: A Legacy of Political Decisions

The psychosocial consequences of these political measures are alarming. Studies show a drastic increase in depression, anxiety disorders, and even suicidal behavior among adolescents. Children’s quality of life has significantly deteriorated, and the number of those suffering under the measures is likely even higher. In a time when children rely especially on social interaction and support, they were isolated and often left alone. The psychological wounds inflicted during this time will accompany many victims for life.

Particularly tragic are the cases of discrimination and exclusion arising from the measures. Children who could not wear masks for health reasons or were unvaccinated were often labeled as “dangerous.” In some cases, this even led to bullying and exclusion at school. Police chased children from parks where they played illegally, as if they were criminals. Such incidents reveal a shocking lack of empathy and understanding for the needs and rights of children.

Institutions Under Fire: Who Bears Responsibility?

Another critical point Klundt raises is the role of key institutions like the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) in implementing and legitimizing these measures. The RKI’s decisions were often unquestioningly presented as scientific consensus, although they frequently contradicted existing research findings. Klundt calls for a critical review of the RKI’s approach and questions whether this institution truly acted in the best interests of children and their families.

It is time for those responsible to be held accountable. If it turns out that measures were taken without sufficient scientific basis or even against better knowledge, consequences must follow. A thorough review of the events during the pandemic is essential to protect future generations from similar mistakes.

Demand for Justice: Who Takes Responsibility?

The debate over responsibility for the severe consequences of Corona measures is far from over. Klundt and his colleague Marcus Klöckner demand a comprehensive investigation and legal review of the decisions made during the pandemic. It must be clarified who bears responsibility for the suffering inflicted on children and youth and how such failings can be prevented in the future.

The call for transparency, accountability, and justice grows louder. It’s not only about admitting mistakes but also ensuring that affected children and their families receive the necessary support and compensation. The political decisions have shown us how quickly fundamental rights can be restricted—and how crucial it is that such restrictions are always critically examined.

An Appeal to Society: Lessons from the Pandemic

Finally, the question remains: What have we learned from this crisis? It must be ensured that the needs and rights of children and adolescents are never again so blatantly ignored in future crises. Our society must become aware of its responsibility to protect the most vulnerable—and that means above all our children.

The political decisions should awaken us all and encourage much more critical scrutiny of such measures in the future. Only then can we prevent a catastrophe like this from ever happening again. Children are our future—it is our duty to protect them from unnecessary suffering. Now is the time to take responsibility and set the course for a fairer, more child-friendly future.

Reviewing Corona Policies is a Necessary Step

A thorough review of political decisions and their consequences during the Corona pandemic is essential to clarify responsibility and restore future trust in state institutions and decision-makers. This review must take place on multiple levels and lead to clear consequences to ensure that such misjudgments are not repeated.

1. Comprehensive Investigative Commissions

At federal, state, and regional levels, independent investigative commissions should be established to examine all aspects of political decisions during the pandemic. These commissions must be interdisciplinary, with experts from medicine, law, psychology, sociology, and children’s rights. The commissions should investigate:

The scientific basis of the measures taken: Were decisions made on a solid scientific foundation? Which alternative strategies were considered or ignored?
The decision-making processes: How were decisions made at various political levels? What role did political interests play, and how strong was the influence of lobby groups?
The impacts of the measures: What concrete psychosocial and health damages were caused by the measures, especially among children and youth?
Responsibility and misconduct: Who is accountable for wrong decisions or lack of proper review? Which institutions and individuals failed?

2. Consequences for Decision-Makers

The investigation results must lead to clear consequences for those responsible:

Political consequences: Politicians at federal, state, and regional levels who played a key role in implementing and enforcing the questionable measures should be held politically accountable. This could include resignations, exclusion from political offices and party structures, and possible criminal prosecution if legal violations are proven.
Accountability in health departments and public health officials: Public health officials and those responsible in health departments who enforced measures without sufficient scientific basis should also be held accountable. This could involve disciplinary proceedings, professional bans, or even criminal consequences if it is proven they knowingly acted against the welfare of children and adolescents.
Measures for school administrations and teachers: School principals and teachers who enforced particularly strict or disproportionate measures must also be reviewed. Disciplinary procedures should be initiated, potentially resulting in administrative consequences such as reassignment, demotion, or in extreme cases, dismissal.

3. Rehabilitation and Compensation for Those Affected

Children, adolescents, and families who suffered particularly under the measures should have the opportunity for rehabilitation and compensation. This includes:

Psychological and educational support: Affected children and youth should have access to comprehensive psychological care and school support to alleviate psychosocial damages.
Legal assistance: Families wishing to take legal action should receive state support to challenge institutional misconduct.
Material compensation: In especially severe cases, material compensation should be considered to alleviate caused suffering.

4. Restoring Trust in State Institutions

Trust in state institutions and decision-makers has been severely damaged by these events. To restore this trust, the following measures must be taken:

Transparency and communication: Future decisions must be communicated transparently and comprehensibly. It must be clear on what basis decisions are made and which alternatives were considered.
Civil society involvement: Citizens should be more involved in decision-making processes, especially regarding measures that have far-reaching effects on people’s lives.
Cultural change in authorities and schools: A stronger focus on the rights and welfare of children and adolescents must be integrated into the training and further education of public officials and teachers.

Question of Trust: Can These People Still Bear Responsibility in the Future?

The question of whether the involved politicians, public health officials, and teachers can still be trusted in the future depends on their willingness to review their actions and their capacity for self-criticism. Those willing to admit mistakes and learn from them could partly regain public trust.

However, it is also clear that those refusing to take responsibility or who made serious errors may no longer be suitable to hold responsible positions in the future. A clear break must be made here to ensure future crises are handled better and more responsibly.

Reviewing Corona policies is a necessary step to lead society on the path to healing and to ensure that past mistakes are not repeated.

Author: AI-Translation - summarygenerator.io und ChatGPT | 19.08.2024

Jeden Tag neue Angebote bis zu 70 Prozent reduziert

Other articles:

Die Bürger zahlen die Zeche für den Krieg der Politik

Die Nachrichtensender überschlagen sich, die Welt brennt an allen Ecken, und was machen unsere Lokalpolitiker? Sie verstecken sich in ihren Büros und ignorieren die brennenden Pr... zum Artikel

Why We Urgently Need an Eco-Democracy

Our democracy no longer works. And that’s a problem. Not because we value it so much, but because far too many people have now realized that it doesn’t actually function. More ... zum Artikel

Police Ban Walk Without Citing Legal Basis

In Aschersleben, it is still not possible to fully exercise the constitutionally guaranteed right to demonstrate.... zum Artikel

Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions:
via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12

or via bank transfer
IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719
BIC: SUMUIE22XXX
Account holder: Michael Thurm

Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer