Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
Which Murder Party Should One Vote For? - Paul Ehrlich Institute Protocols PublishedMeasures-friends, pandemic-lovers and vaccine-worshippers now need to be very, very strong. 
Anyone who reads the following lines and still wants to believe in the sacred narrative of “safe and effective,” “no alternative,” and “solidarity through the jab” either needs armored cognitive dissonance or a hefty dose of self-deception. For the protocols of the Paul Ehrlich Institute, obtained only with the help of a lawyer, are now out in the open. And they smell of what, in normal times, one would call the negligent acceptance of harm – in Corona times, it was called “Follow the Science.” Bastian Barucker has summarized some crucial passages from the protocols on Facebook. On August 19, 2020, an external PEI committee discussed the approval of the mRNA vaccines in the presence of then-President Klaus Cichutek. The statements are remarkable: 1. They established the status quo: »circulating virus, relatively few illnesses and infection clusters in Germany, moderate to strong spread abroad (corresponds to the current status quo)«. The clear conclusion was: »In principle, only regularly approved vaccines should be used.« 2. One (unfortunately redacted) voice said: »Given the very low mortality rate in Germany, in their view it is not advisable to work with a poorly tested vaccine as long as the worst-case scenario does not exist.« The low mortality rate remained. The poorly tested vaccine was nevertheless approved. The doubts were therefore known internally – and were overruled. 3. They correctly stated: »For certain population groups (children, pregnant women), a very careful benefit-risk assessment should be carried out. The vaccine should only be used under continuous safety monitoring, and efforts should be made to generate serological data during vaccine use.« No adequate active safety monitoring took place. The raw data remain secret to this day. Pregnant women and children were nevertheless vaccinated. So even before approval, there were experts who recognized the risks. They were ignored. The protocols were published on nius.de and linked as PDFs. Anyone who wants to can read them instead of continuing to parrot the fairy tale that “there was no alternative.” All Measures Without Any Basis - Family Vaccination Campaigns in the Burgenland District Despite Very Low MortalityAnd now a look at the local level, where the grand words were translated into concrete coercion: District Administrator Götz Ulrich (CDU) of the Burgenland district. He opened vaccination centers, sent vaccination buses and vaccination teams into the field to have people “vaccinated” en masse. He enforced the “containment measures” that, in practice, created the pressure necessary to get people to inject the experimental substances. In the district council, he was asked why it was so important to him that citizens participate in the testing of these preparations – in light of Jens Spahn’s statement before the Enquete Commission on December 15, 2025, that preventing transmission had never been the goal of the research and that the vaccines were still being tested on the market. His answer? Taking responsibility? Nowhere to be found.By November 2021 at the latest, District Administrator Götz Ulrich also knew that the so-called vaccines would only “protect” against severe disease. From January 2022 onward, he and the public health officer Dr. Ina Treu campaigned for the vaccination of children aged 5 and over. There was an interview in which a woman described how her husband could not withstand the pressure and died a miserable death as a result of the “vaccination.” So there were also deaths in the Burgenland district. To this day, the district administrator refuses to apologize. Vaccinated people who are experiencing problems are supposed to contact the PEI or the manufacturers as “consumers.” If his actions have consequences, he merely takes note of them. Typical: Some bear the risks, while others have the official gazettes and the presumption of innocence on their side. Which of the Murder Parties Should One Vote For?Finally, the burning question for all those who enthusiastically or opportunistically went along with it from 2020 to 2023: Which of the Murder Parties – meaning those parties that pushed the entire Corona madness through (CDU, CSU, SPD, FDP, Greens, Left) – should one vote for to make sure that, in future pandemics or other pseudo-catastrophes declared by politicians, at least the same approach will be taken? With mask madness, testing madness, vaccination madness, measures madness, restrictions on fundamental rights, followed by cover-ups, secrecy, and the rejection of any responsibility?They knew! At the regional political level, too, they could have known – they should have known. They ignored it. Instead of standing up for the people and their health, they played along with the Corona theater and undoubtedly accepted that it would cost human lives. Anyone who wants continuity will be very well served by these parties. The protocols are there. So are the dead and the injured. Those responsible shrug their shoulders and talk about “consumers.” Strong nerves, measures-friends. You need very strong nerves and a high degree of cognitive dissonance to brush all this aside and continue to remain loyal to this political class.
Author: AI-Translation - АИИ | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Mandatory E-Invoicing from 2025 - Digitalization Center Provides Information on Upcoming Obligation for Electronic Invoicing - Free Seminar and Networking BBQTo support regional entrepreneurs with the mandatory implementation of electronic invoicing, the Digitalization Center Zeitz is hosting a free seminar titled “Mandatory E-Invoici... zum Artikel |
 | IKIG - Future Opportunity or Money Pit?Anyone following the press has likely come across the term IKIG, the Intermunicipal Industrial Area, particularly in the communities of Weißenfels, Hohenmölsen, Lützen, and Teuc... zum Artikel |
 | Zeitz Has a Problem - When Simplicity Wants to Defend Diversity and Democracy - An Online Chat with Christian PagelRegarding the article about the "Secret Meeting over Deportation in Zeitz," there were, among other places, some discussions on Facebook. Outstanding once again was the fighter for... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |