Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
The Cold-Hearted CDU District Administrator Götz Ulrich, His Vaccine Zealotry and Mask FetishOn February 23, 2022, District Administrator Götz Ulrich (CDU) and public health officer Dr. Ina Treu once again staged the ritual of the Corona liturgy during the Burgenlandkreis district's digital press conference. Continuation of “Pandemic Idiocy of Schizophrenic Arbitrariness – Vaccine Zealot CDU District Administrator Götz Ulrich Celebrated the Corona Madness” Ulrich welcomed viewers to the “last weekly” show for the time being, because the “information situation at the moment was not so dense.” What followed was the usual number game without context, the withholding of relevant background information, and continued propaganda for mandatory vaccination, which even according to the public health officer's own statements at the time had lost any basis whatsoever. Today, with the RKI minutes obtained through litigation, missing PEI analyses of health insurance data, and international findings, this event looks like a textbook example of bureaucratic coldness and deliberate disinformation. Numbers Without Context: The Staging of the ThreatUlrich and Treu reported 49 hospital beds occupied by Corona patients (ten more than the previous week), two in intensive care, nine deaths “with or from” Corona during the previous week, an incidence rate of 1,259 (moving sideways within a range of 1,100–1,400), and a hospitalization rate of around 25. The average age of the “patients” was 33 – mainly children and adolescents following the start of the school year (the testing frenzy in schools drove the incidence rate upward), with an increase among people over 60 and over 70 in nursing homes.What was completely missing? Any context. The Burgenlandkreis had around 176,000 to 177,000 inhabitants in 2021/2022. The SRH hospitals in Naumburg and Zeitz alone had several hundred beds (older figures put Naumburg at up to 468, Zeitz at around 290; with additional capacity in Weißenfels). 49 occupied beds – several of them occupied by patients admitted primarily for reasons other than Covid symptoms but who had tested positive – did not constitute an overload. The ages given for hospitalized patients (40 to 90, increasingly 70+) and those who had died (58 to 90) remained vague ranges. Two children (an infant with its mother and a twelve-year-old) were mentioned, without any indication of severity or comparative risk. Particularly striking: In the nursing-home outbreaks, the proportion of vaccinated people was extremely high. St. Laurentius Freiburg: 41 residents infected (almost all vaccinated); of 11 employees, two were vaccinated. Töpferdamm Weißenfels: 12 residents, ten of them vaccinated; three deaths with Omicron BA.2. Betreuungszentrum Weißenfels: 17 residents, all vaccinated. Ulrich and Treu even stopped reporting separate incidence figures for vaccinated and unvaccinated people – allegedly because there were too many unresolved cases in which vaccination status was unclear. They no longer wanted any “uncertain” figures. The reality that vaccinated people were being infected on a massive scale and were overrepresented in nursing homes did not fit the narrative of a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” The RKI minutes (obtained through litigation and later partially leaked unredacted) subsequently confirmed what had already been foreseeable at the time: From a scientific perspective, the phrase “pandemic of the unvaccinated” was “not correct. The total population contributes.” The RKI experts knew it – politicians and local enforcers such as Ulrich continued preaching this misinformation. Treu emphasized that Omicron was clinically milder, but “not a common cold”; unvaccinated people faced a high risk of severe disease, particularly with increasing age. Vaccination protected against this. As early as November 4, 2021, Treu had stated that vaccination only protected against severe disease. That should have settled the issue of compulsory vaccination: The state may not force anyone to undergo a medical intervention merely to protect that person from themselves. The risk of severe disease for healthy and younger people was already low at the time; Omicron reduced it further. Nevertheless, the facility-based vaccination mandate was pushed ahead relentlessly, effective March 15, 2022. Ulrich announced 3,000–3,100 doses of Novavax, initially for people affected by the vaccination mandate (nursing homes, hospitals, etc.), and subsequently for everyone. Advance registration was available online or by telephone; an employer's certificate was required. People who refused lost their jobs – a violation of the right to physical integrity and the Nuremberg Code, which prohibits forced medical experiments and interventions without informed consent. Novavax, promoted as an “inactivated vaccine,” showed high efficacy against Alpha variants in early trials (around 90 percent against symptomatic disease). Real-world data under Omicron (Italy and other studies) showed around 30–50 percent against infection and symptomatic disease – at best individual protection, which could never justify a mandate. Vaccine Side Effects: Indifference and Handout PropagandaThe special topic was vaccine reactions, complications, and injuries. Treu cited the PEI safety report: By the end of 2021, more than 148 million vaccinations had been administered, with a reporting rate of 1.6 per 1,000 doses (0.2 percent serious). In Saxony-Anhalt, 108 suspected cases had been reported by physicians; in the Burgenlandkreis, 18. Mild reactions (redness, fever) were said to be common and temporary; serious ones such as myocarditis (particularly in young men after a second mRNA dose), thromboses, and Guillain-Barré syndrome were rare. The state would cover all injuries resulting from publicly recommended vaccinations (§ 60 IfSG, social compensation law). “The vaccine is very well tolerated,” and the benefits clearly outweighed the risks. There was still little experience with Novavax.The disinformation was blatant. When a journalist asked how many of the 18 cases had suffered permanent injuries and whether there had been any deaths, Treu replied: No death in connection with vaccination. There had been no feedback on the outcomes of the 18 cases – the PEI processed cases nationwide and did not provide details back to the districts. They knew nothing about recovery or applications for compensation. In contrast to positive PCR tests, for which they followed up by telephone and enforced quarantine, they showed zero interest in potential vaccine-injured people. No inquiry as to whether help was needed. There have also been deaths in the Burgenlandkreis. Yet the cold-hearted district administrator has shown no interest in such cases to this day. In the name of the supposed “protection of public health,” people were very likely knowingly sacrificed. Today we know: Getting vaccine injuries officially recognized is an obstacle course. By mid-2025, more than 14,000 applications had been submitted nationwide; only around 6.5 percent of the cases that had received decisions were recognized (around 633). More than 90 percent were rejected. Courts dismiss most lawsuits or demand extreme levels of proof; those affected fight for years for handouts such as occupational disability pensions or basic pensions under social compensation law. Many fail. The health insurance data that the PEI itself requested for a safety study were not evaluated, or were only incompletely evaluated, for years – despite statutory possibilities and early warnings (e.g. BKK ProVita, which reported massively higher numbers of treatments due to side effects). The PEI and official bodies continued to emphasize low reporting rates from the spontaneous reporting system, while independent and foreign analyses (batch analyses, real-world data) pointed to underreporting and safety signals. In the United States, FOIA documents and hearings (including those concerning Fauci) revealed that protection against transmission had never been a primary endpoint of the authorization trials and that efficacy against infection/transmission had been overestimated early on – in parallel with the German reality, in which vaccinated people continued to transmit and contract the virus. When I asked the district council in early 2026 how the Burgenlandkreis had reached out to people suffering injuries, including deaths, the district administrator's deputy, Dr. Ariane Körner, replied: Those affected should contact the PEI or the manufacturers as consumers. Consumers! Not as citizens who had been subjected to a state-recommended, promoted, and in some cases coerced medical intervention, but as customers who were expected to handle their own complaints. Cold-hearted cynicism in its purest form. The Mask Theater and the Fetishistic District AdministratorWhile Ulrich and Treu wore FFP2 masks in the large room, more than 1.5 meters apart and with no audience present, Ulrich removed his mask when answering questions and immediately put it back on. A ridiculous spectacle. The RKI minutes later noted: “There is no evidence for the benefit of FFP2 masks outside occupational safety.” The ritual served to intimidate people and to present themselves as virtuous saviors. Ulrich, the vaccine zealot who wanted to push through the facility-based mandate “relentlessly,” while at the same time scrapping the separate statistics for vaccinated and unvaccinated people because they had become inconvenient.This press conference was not information, but propaganda. It ignored the high vaccination rate among those infected and hospitalized, refused to provide context regarding population size and bed capacity, downplayed the obstacles faced by people seeking recognition of vaccine injuries, and continued the coercion even though protection against severe disease itself (according to Treu) did not justify a mandate. The RKI files obtained through litigation, the failure to evaluate PEI health insurance data, and international findings regarding limited efficacy and transmission protection expose the whole affair as ideological madness that cost people their jobs, their health, and their trust. Ulrich and Treu were local enforcers of a system that celebrated numbers without context, masks without purpose, and mandates without justification – and later dismissed those who suffered harm as “consumers.” Cold-hearted and still unaddressed to this day. CDU District Administrator Götz Ulrich continues to reject an apology to this day. He accepts no responsibility. He “takes note” of the consequences. A district administrator who genuinely cared about people would take care of those affected by vaccine side effects. Ulrich does not. He rejects this. He is simply not a district administrator for the citizens. He carries out orders from above. He is an administrator and an enforcer. Nothing more! Author: AI-Translation - АИИ | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | District Disregards Court Ruling and Wants to Keep Collecting MoneySteffen Hirschfeld received a reminder from the Burgenlandkreis because he did not pay the fine notice that, according to a court ruling, he does not have to pay.... zum Artikel |
 | Monday Demonstration in Zeitz on 15.1.24 – Farmers’ Protest on SiteOn Monday, January 15, 2024, the 2nd farmers’ protest demonstration began in Zeitz. 51 tractors, trucks, and other vehicles from tradespeople and small business owners took part ... zum Artikel |
 | The deadline ignorer and double-standard measurer - still no answer to question in the district council from District Administrator Götz Ulrich (CDU)Do you also know people like this, who are always very pedantic towards you and immediately know when you may, under certain circumstances, possibly have done something not entirel... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |