Deutsch   English   Français   Español   Türkçe   Polski   Русский   Rumână   Українська   العربية
Home   About   Contact

Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!




Saxony-Anhalt celebrates itself once again – and the citizen is left to guess what exactly for


There are moments when one wonders whether administrative communication is secretly being practiced as its own art form. Saxony-Anhalt regularly provides new examples of this – most recently once again in an impressive way through a press release that made its way into the digital public sphere via a Facebook post.



Even the opening of “Successful model project strengthens cooperation in the education sector in Saxony-Anhalt - final report on the model project Cooperation in municipal education management is a small masterpiece of modern self-assurance: a model project was “successful,” “cooperation was strengthened,” “results are positive.” One can almost feel the administration patting itself on the back while, somewhere in the background, an Excel spreadsheet hums contentedly.

Everything appears rounded, clean, and finished – as if it were a project that leaves no open questions whatsoever. If it weren’t for that one small, seemingly insignificant side note: there is a final report.

A final report! That sounds like substance, like data, like results, like something one can actually read when one does not merely want to enjoy the press-release version of “good weather conditions.”

The moment when transparency stops

And this is exactly where the real adventure begins. Because anyone who becomes curious – truly curious, in an old-fashioned civic sense – and actually wants to read this report, experiences digital Saxony-Anhalt at its most poetic: the great nothing.

No clean download link. No archive. No central document hub. No “everything is transparently available” logic.
Instead: links that lead into emptiness. Paths dissolving into administrative fog. Documents that apparently exist only as long as no one actually tries to read them.

Communication in glossy finish – content in deep water

The press release itself uses a language that can only be described as “administrative euphoric prose”:
  • “successful model project”
  • “strengthened cooperation”
  • “positive balance”
  • “important findings for the future”
Everything sounds like progress, controllability, and future competence. Only one thing is consistently missing: concreteness.

What exactly improved? What data is available? What problems were solved – and which were not? What costs were incurred? What conflicts of objectives arose?

The answers remain – as so often – elegantly in the background. One might say: strategically placed with discretion. Or less kindly: simply not visible.

The final report as a digital Schrödinger document

The truly brilliant aspect is this: the final report exists and does not exist at the same time.

It is mentioned, celebrated, politically classified – but when one tries to read it, it behaves like a digital Schrödinger document: formally present, practically impossible to find.

And so the interested citizen is left with a fascinating epistemic triangle:
  1. There was a project.
  2. It was successful.
  3. Evidence of it exists somewhere… probably.

Civic participation in practice

So what does the citizen do with this information?

They could of course:
  • be happy about the good news
  • like the Facebook post
  • and gratefully acknowledge that somewhere, something is working
Or they could try to know more. And this is exactly where the problem begins: knowing more is apparently not intended, but merely optional add-on content for particularly persistent types of researchers.

Everything fine. Please do not ask further questions.

In the end, a classic administrative narrative remains in its purest form: a lot of work was done. A lot was achieved. A lot was communicated.

And anyone who still has questions has apparently misunderstood the system.

Because modern transparency today does not work in a way where things are found. It works in a way where one knows they exist. And that, apparently, must be enough.



Author: AI-Translation - АИИ  | 

Jeden Tag neue Angebote bis zu 70 Prozent reduziert

Other articles:

The Middle Finger of District Administrator Götz Ulrich and the Shy Representatives

It took a long time. After many months, a letter from the district administrator regarding my objection to the prohibition of video recording of the district committee meeting on 1... zum Artikel

More War for More Biodiversity

What we get daily from the politics so dearly loved by many is, time and again, very strange — if not downright contradictory.... zum Artikel

IKIG - Future Opportunity or Money Pit?

Anyone following the press has likely come across the term IKIG, the Intermunicipal Industrial Area, particularly in the communities of Weißenfels, Hohenmölsen, Lützen, and Teuc... zum Artikel

der offizielle Kanal der Bürgerstimme auf Telegram   der offizielle Kanal der Bürgerstimme auf YouTube   Bürgerstimme auf Facebook

Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions:
via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12

or via bank transfer
IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719
BIC: SUMUIE22XXX
Account holder: Michael Thurm


Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips   Imprint / Disclaimer