Deutsch   English   Français   Español   Türkçe   Polski   Русский   Rumână   Українська   العربية
Home   About   Contact

Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!




Do you want to produce even more poverty in Germany, Karl Lauterbach?


Between climate policy, CO₂ taxes, and international demands, concern is growing among many citizens about rising living costs. Critics warn that political measures taken in the name of climate protection could increasingly affect everyday life, mobility, and housing.



The word “state of emergency” rightly triggers alarm among most people. When former German Federal Minister of Health Karl Lauterbach, in his new role as WHO climate expert, calls for the climate crisis to be classified as a global health emergency, alarm bells are ringing for millions of citizens. Especially among those who do not live in the Berlin bubble, but in rural areas and depend on cars and affordable heating.

Officially, ministries offer reassurance: no need to worry, such an emergency is only a “symbolic wake-up call.” There would supposedly be no direct driving bans, no curfews, and gas stations would remain open. But anyone thinking logically immediately realizes: not everything can stay the same. Otherwise, why declare a global emergency at all if nothing is supposed to happen afterward?

The truth is: politicians may not be planning to shut down gas stations by decree—because that would immediately fail in court. Instead, they are choosing a far more insidious path that hits people’s everyday lives just as hard: the consistent financial squeeze.

The plan behind the emergency: giving up through rising costs

If people cannot be directly forbidden from driving or heating their homes, then the goal is to make it simply unaffordable. Through the steadily increasing CO₂ tax, petrol, diesel, heating oil, and gas are artificially made so expensive that citizens eventually give up. This is not a formal ban, but it still forces rural populations to their knees.

How radical the thinking behind this system is has already been made clear by Karl Lauterbach in past interviews (including in Der Spiegel and DIE WELT). His demands are documented:
- A worldwide reduction of meat consumption by a staggering 80 percent, because we “can no longer afford” this diet. - The radical end of cheap travel. “It will no longer be possible to fly as cheaply as before,” Lauterbach said. - Less production and a forced departure from our current economic model.

Who pays the price?

For a high-income earner in a big city who rides a cargo bike to the organic supermarket, this may sound like a clean future. For the nurse, the tradesperson, or the commuter in rural areas who must travel many kilometers to work and face exploding heating costs, this policy means a direct slide into poverty.

There is a risk of the absurd situation where workers can simply no longer afford fuel for their daily commute. If the journey to work becomes unaffordable, people in rural areas lose their very livelihood.

Mr. Lauterbach and the climate thinkers in Brussels and Berlin are not banning life by law—but they are simply making it unaffordable for ordinary citizens. Hence only one question remains for the former minister: Do you want to produce even more poverty in Germany through this enforced loss of prosperity?

Documented sources for the article:

- Lauterbach as WHO expert: DIE WELT – Former Health Minister Karl Lauterbach becomes WHO climate expert
- Demand for 80% less meat: DIE WELT – Lauterbach calls for massive reduction in meat consumption
- Statements on more expensive flying and reduced consumption: German Medical Journal – Climate protection demands by Karl Lauterbach



Author: AI-Translation - Katharina Koenig  | 

Jeden Tag neue Angebote bis zu 70 Prozent reduziert

Other articles:

Spectacular Public Art Action in Hohenmölsen - Who Are the Mysterious Artists?

If you didn’t keep your eyes completely shut while strolling through the secret capital of the region, Hohenmölsen, you could have witnessed a spectacular and mysterious public ... zum Artikel

The Whining District Administrator: Götz Ulrich’s Lament Over the 2026 District Levy – Talking, Talking, Talking, but No Pressure Upwards

On March 30, 2026, agenda item 17 was on the program at the Burgenlandkreis district council: the deliberation on setting the 2026 district levy.... zum Artikel

The Enquiry Commission as Theater: Dr. Susanne Wagenmann’s Gentle Criticism and the Suppressed Truths of the RKI Files

On June 11, 2026, Dr. Susanne Wagenmann, Head of the Social Security Department at the Confederation of German Employers' Associations (BDA), appeared before the Bundestag's COVID-... zum Artikel

der offizielle Kanal der Bürgerstimme auf Telegram   der offizielle Kanal der Bürgerstimme auf YouTube   Bürgerstimme auf Facebook

Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions:
via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12

or via bank transfer
IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719
BIC: SUMUIE22XXX
Account holder: Michael Thurm


Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips   Imprint / Disclaimer