Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
The Lockdown Makers and the obedient district administrator Götz UlrichOn April 23, another hearing of the Bundestag’s COVID-19 Enquete Commission took place. The topic was “Critical Infrastructure (KRITIS) and the role of the Bundeswehr.” However, information shared in a working group also raised eyebrows. 
Roger Bittel (Bittel TV) hosted Tom Lausen in a live video call to talk about what statements were made. Tom Lausen also spoke about what was asked and answered in a working group. And this should make some regional officials’ ears perk up. Tom Lausen reports that the employees of the Robert Koch Institute are civil servants. At the Robert Koch Institute, the decision was made to raise the risk assessment from moderate to high. According to Lausen, this was the RKI’s biggest decision since 1945. The consequence was the rollout of massive measures. Lausen asked a civil servant whether such decisions must be thoroughly documented. The answer was a clear yes. However, when the decision was made solely by Wieler and Schaade on a Sunday, this documentation was missing. There were no records of interpretations of data, charts, trends, etc., to make the decision traceable afterward. For Lausen, this is anything but funny and “a point where we have a real problem.” All alone, without a specialist team, RKI president Lothar Wieler and his then-deputy Lars Schaade (now head of the RKI) sat together on a Sunday and made this decision. Two people made this decision without documentation, which in consequence led to the measures and also the lockdown, because all politics—from the federal level to the state level down to the regional level—considered this decision to be binding and unquestionable. From Tom Lausen’s point of view, investigations by the public prosecutor’s office should be initiated. Lausen also intends to write again to the Bundestag members who were present in the working group. The questioning of expert Stephan KohnAt the Enquete Commission session, former expert Stephan Kohn was questioned. He had analyzed the situation at the beginning of the “pandemic.” By May 8, 2020, Kohn had compiled, based on various expert reports, an 83-page “evaluation report” of division KM4 (Crisis Management, Department 4) titled “Coronavirus Crisis 2020 from the perspective of Critical Infrastructure Protection” with the subtitle “Evaluation of the previous response strategy and recommendations for action.” In May 2020, Kohn sent this internal position paper via email with the subject “Results of the internal evaluation of coronavirus crisis management” to his department head, the coronavirus crisis unit, the Chancellery, and all German state governments. This email was leaked and caused a scandal. Kohn had initially forwarded the report to the head of department, who asked him to act under his own name and not on behalf of KM4. Kohn then contacted Minister Horst Seehofer, whose office did not forward the letter. On May 8 at 15:34, he sent the report by email to his superior in the ministry, the coronavirus crisis unit, and the Chancellery, with copies to the state governments. Kohn apparently sent the report on his own responsibility and using the official insignia of the Federal Ministry of the Interior, arguing that urgent danger was present. Kohn was subsequently suspended and his work computer was confiscated. A spokesperson for the Interior Ministry accused Kohn of having “neither a mandate nor authorization” from the ministry. The ministry described Kohn’s analysis as a “critical private opinion.” Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel commented on Kohn’s document, and Interior Minister Horst Seehofer announced on May 14, 2020, that disciplinary proceedings against Kohn were being considered. The next day, these were initiated on the grounds of unauthorized disclosure of information. In addition, the Federal Ministry of the Interior issued Kohn a ban from entering the premises. A ministry spokesperson stated that Kohn was not suspended because of his critical opinion, but because he used official letterhead, which gave the impression of an official ministry position. In March 2022, he was removed from service by the Berlin Administrative Court. Source: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephan_Kohn Kohn stated that government strategy in a real pandemic should actually be to avoid panic in the population. Instead, the now well-known “panic paper” was written to deliberately create fear. It is now confirmed that there was no basis for the measures. Bundeswehr vaccination dataAlso discussed were the Bundeswehr’s data, where compulsory tolerance of the COVID-19 vaccination was enforced. Soldiers who did not comply were removed from service. In 2020 there were about 3,000 positive cases in the Bundeswehr; in 2021 over 10,000 soldiers tested positive; and in 2022 nearly 93,000 soldiers tested positive—out of 183,000 Bundeswehr soldiers and staff. The vaccination rate in the Bundeswehr was over 99 percent. The obligation to tolerate vaccination was suddenly abolished in 2023. According to a statement available to Tom Lausen, the reason was that the vaccine did not achieve the “hoped-for” protective effect. This suggests that protection was expected, but there were no data showing that such protection actually existed. In total, four Bundeswehr soldiers are said to have died from (or with) COVID-19. For three of these soldiers it is known that they were vaccinated; for the fourth, vaccination is assumed. Stefan Homburg pointed out that in 2020, 400,000 healthcare workers were placed on reduced hours because, in this “largest pandemic” since the Spanish flu, there were not enough patients in hospitals. Hospitals had to be kept from bankruptcy through state subsidies. I recommend watching the videos themselves to obtain the information firsthand. The obedient district administrator Götz Ulrich in the BurgenlandkreisThe much-loved district administrator of the Burgenlandkreis, Götz Ulrich, of course did not question the measures. As is well known, one should not question. The then RKI president Lothar Wieler had strongly advised against questioning. As a member of the CDU (Corona Dictatorship Subordinates), the district administrator might in “our democracy” have met a fate similar to Stephan Kohn or the Weimar family judge Christian Dettmar, who were not only dismissed but also stripped of their pension rights. That, of course, cannot be desired. So the beloved district administrator also submitted to the Corona regime and “gifted” the citizens, the sovereign in the Burgenlandkreis, with measures ranging from mask mandates to lockdowns and vaccinations. Whether things would have been different under a SPD district administrator (Special Pandemic Dictatorship) is doubtful. My question, which I asked at the last district council meeting—why it was so important to the district administrator that people in the Burgenlandkreis participate in this test of “highly modern mRNA vaccines”—has not yet been answered. The district administrator still has until April 30, 2026, to respond. Since it was found in the Bundeswehr that the “hoped-for” protective effect did not occur, it would indeed be interesting why, in the view of District Administrator Götz Ulrich, the civilian population of the Burgenlandkreis should have participated in this human experiment and was in fact coerced into doing so through imposed measures. It would also now be important to know why the beloved district administrator Götz Ulrich never questioned the RKI’s reclassification. As chief administrative officer, he should actually be aware that such decisions and measures must be justified based on facts. It is also his duty to check whether such measures are justified, since infection control is a matter for the federal states and the districts are responsible for implementation. Moreover, there is no blind obedience in administration. Decisions from above must generally be questioned and reviewed for legality. If it is determined that such decisions are unlawful and lack basis, an objection must be raised. As chief administrative officer, a district administrator can and must stand up against unlawful decisions. Author: AI-Translation - Michael Thurm | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Energy Crisis: 15 Liters of Petrol or Diesel Guaranteed Daily – Federal Government Ensures Energy SecurityDue to the situation in the Persian Gulf and the bottleneck in energy supply, Federal Chancellor Friedrich Merz will hold a press conference in a few days to present measures to se... zum Artikel |
 | Residents of Zeitz Want to Pressure the Federal Railway and Launch Petition for S-BahnAnd not just Deutsche Bahn – also the Federal Ministry for Digital and Transport!... zum Artikel |
 | City of Weißenfels Offers 500 Euro Reward for Stolen Schiller Memorial PlaqueThe city of Weißenfels is asking for help: Between April 3, 2025, at 14:00 and April 5, 2025, at 20:30, the historic bronze plaque was stolen from the Schiller Memorial in Klemmbe... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |