Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
When will the mandatory name tag with QR-code armband finally be introduced?You know how it goes: first comes an age verification app, then a digital identity wallet, and before you know it, the path from “I’ll just quickly confirm my age” to “Please open your complete digital life file” is only one software update away. 
The EU is working – very much for our protection, of course – with remarkable consistency to gradually turn the internet into a place where nobody can simply do anything anymore without first politely updating their data profile. Recently, a super amazing EU age verification app was presented by the much-loved Ursula von der Leyen (CDU). Although this app was hacked in no time at all. But since it’s about maximum transparency and fully transparent citizens, that shouldn’t be a problem, right? And while people are still getting used to the idea that soon every platform will need to know whether you are old enough, only one logical question remains: why still do it halfway? If we are already consistently advancing digital identity, age verification, and secure online registration, why not take the next step? Away from these cumbersome individual queries on the internet, towards something truly unified, efficient, and Europe-ready: a general obligation to wear name tags in public spaces. Mandatory name tags and QR-code armbandsJust imagine it in practice. No more guessing in the supermarket or at events, no more uncertain interpretation of facial expressions, no more social grey areas. A quick scan is enough, and the world is in order. Name, address, income, wealth, marital status, outstanding payments, CO2 footprint, party membership – all neatly structured and available at any time. Maybe even a small note about your current emotional state of the day, so you immediately know whether a conversation is even worth having.How pleasant that would be. No more room for interpretation, no misunderstandings, no unpleasant surprises. If digital identity is the goal anyway, then it should be done consistently: not just on the internet, but everywhere people meet and occasionally run into the problem of not immediately knowing how they are supposed to behave toward each other. Because that is really the core problem of our time: too much uncertainty. Too much ambiguity about who someone is and how seriously they should be taken. A QR armband would solve that elegantly. One scan is enough, and the social hierarchy is clearly sorted. Communication would finally work efficiently again. Of course, someone might object that this would be a bit too much transparency. But modern digital policy has already anticipated this: those who have nothing to hide, supposedly have nothing to fear. And those who do have something to hide should perhaps just wait for a few more updates. Seen this way, the development would only be logical. First age verification, then digital identity, then the visible QR code in everyday life. At some point, the boundary between the online and offline world is anyway just a technical implementation detail. And maybe the world would actually become more peaceful. No more sideways glances without context, no unanswered questions about someone’s social status, no irritations in everyday life. Everything clear, everything transparent, everything regulated. Just one small scan away from complete social harmony. Everyday life in the new systemThe supermarket on Saturday morning would noticeably change. You reach for the milk, turn around, and before a simple “excuse me” even arises, the first eye contact already triggers an automatic data check. A soft beep from the scanner, and the social situation sorts itself out.“Ah, good morning, Mr. Müller, IT consultant, €48,000 annual income, two children, no criminal record. Nice weather today.” “Yes, good morning,” Mr. Müller replies politely, because the situation is clear and misunderstandings are technically impossible. At the vegetable shelf, things might get a bit more nuanced. Two people reach for the last organic bell pepper at the same time. One scan later, it is clear: different income classes, membership in a martial arts club, different priority levels in the social conflict model. A quick glance is enough, a nod, and the pepper changes hands without discussion. Efficiency emerges where communication used to be necessary. And then there are the other momentsOf course, this new transparency also comes with its social fine-tuning. At the checkout, for example. Someone complains about the price of a product, the queue becomes restless. A quick QR scan of the waiting customers, and the situation is already classified: average income, high sensitivity to price changes, emotional overload from weekend stress. Reactions adjust automatically. Understanding no longer arises from empathy, but from data.“It’s okay,” someone behind him says, “with your tax bracket, I’d probably have argued too.” And sometimes it still escalatesBecause of course, transparency does not solve all problems – it merely shifts them into new categories.Two people get into an argument because both are convinced they are right. In the past, this would have been a classic dispute of opinions. Now it is a data conflict. “Your financial reliability does not justify your tone,” one says calmly after scanning the other’s QR code. “Interesting,” comes the reply, “your criminal record history says something quite different about your conflict competence.” The situation does not become unclear, but precise. Everyone now knows exactly who they are arguing with. The great social benefitAnd of course, the system would have a very special advantage: one could instantly see who wants to be part of society and behaves in a system-compliant way, and who is an enemy of the state order – completely efficiently, without annoying discussions or grey zones.Those refusing name tags or QR-code armbands would immediately be identified as enemies of democracy, enemies of transparency, and of indispensable social cohesion, much like the mask refusers or protestors against COVID measures once were. One phone call would be enough, and law enforcement and police could pick up such dissidents. Perhaps it could even be enshrined in law that without an armband and name tag, you are no longer allowed to enter the supermarket at all. Author: AI-Translation - АИИ | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | Eric Stehr (The Left) and the weather vane in the wind at the European Protest Day for Equality of People with DisabilitiesOn May 5, 2026, the European Protest Day for Equality of People with Disabilities took place. On this occasion there was also in Weißenfels on the market a—well, let’s call it... zum Artikel |
 | Death Threat After Demo on 08/26/2024 – Interview with Colette Bornkamm-RinkAt the end of a demonstration by government critics in Aschersleben, a serious incident occurred when an Albanian man threatened one of the participants with death. Among the topic... zum Artikel |
 | No Tax-Free Pensions up to 1,800 Euros – Saxony-Anhalt State Parliament Votes Against Left Party ProposalAt a time when old-age poverty in East Germany is an urgent problem, one might expect that a proposal to relieve low-income pensioners would receive broad support. Yet the second r... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |