Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE!
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| Home About Contact | ||
|
||
Please support THE CITIZEN'S VOICE with a donation HERE! | ||
|
|
||
Nazis in the Frauenkirche Dresden – Double Standards Are Better Than MoralityThe Frauenkirche in Dresden is considered a symbol of peace, reconciliation, and the lessons learned from the catastrophe of the Second World War. Hardly any place in Germany stands so strongly for the historic “Never again.” Precisely for that reason, an event that took place there at the end of February seems particularly disturbing. 
In the lower church of the Frauenkirche, German politicians met with a delegation from Ukraine. They had been invited to a public discussion organized by the CDU-affiliated Konrad Adenauer Foundation. Among the guests: former Ukrainian prisoners of war – including members of the notorious Azov Regiment. That alone would already be politically explosive. But the real scandal lies in the details. One of the guests, the former Azov fighter Gennady Kharchenko, reportedly appeared wearing unmistakable symbolism. His T-shirt read “Free Azov,” along with a skull and – particularly striking – the Wolfsangel. A symbol historically associated with the symbolism of the SS. The article describes the scene as follows: “On the right sleeve the neo-Nazi symbol Wolfsangel could be seen … and a skull.”But that is not all. The man is also said to have worn tattooed neo-Nazi symbolism. And where did this meeting take place? Not just anywhere. But in a sacred place that is officially described as a space of “silence, personal reflection, and prayer.” The New Approach to SymbolsThe irony of this scene could hardly be greater.Germany likes to present itself as a moral world power. Historical responsibility, remembrance culture, and the fight against every form of right-wing extremism are part of the Federal Republic’s official self-image. Hardly a school year passes without days of remembrance, hardly a political speech without “Never again.” But apparently this “never again” applies only very selectively. While German citizens can be criminally prosecuted for banned symbols, wearing historically tainted symbols suddenly no longer seems to be a problem – provided the wearer stands on the “right” political side. The Azov fighter in question, in any case, was not asked to leave. On the contrary: he was welcomed by German politicians. The article puts it this way: “The Wolfsangel fighter was … received and warmly welcomed by the highest political office-holders of the country.”If that is true, a simple question arises: Where is the otherwise so sensitive moral alarmism? Selectively OutragedSince the beginning of the war in Ukraine, a very clear narrative has been cultivated in Germany: Ukraine stands for freedom, democracy, and European values. Criticism of this narrative is quickly labeled “disinformation” or “propaganda.”Yet even in Western analyses it is known that the Azov Regiment emerged from far-right milieus and at times even used the Wolfsangel as a symbol. Of course, the regiment has formally integrated into the Ukrainian armed forces. And of course a military unit does not consist only of ideologues. But symbols remain symbols. And anyone appearing with such symbols in a German church should at least trigger a discussion. Instead, it seems to have bothered no one. Morality as a Political ToolThe real scandal may not even be the event itself. Scandals happen. Mistakes happen.The scandal is the reaction – or rather, the absence of any reaction. Because one can easily imagine what would have happened if the political context had been different. If, for example, a German activist had appeared in a church with similar symbolism. The media storm would have been guaranteed. But in this case everything remained remarkably quiet. The problem therefore is less the individual incident than the political logic behind it: morality today is no longer a universal principle. It has become a tool of geopolitical communication. And tools are used selectively. The Great Double StandardGermany likes to present itself as Europe’s moral compass. Yet more and more often this morality appears to be a one-way street.What counts as “extremism” among political opponents becomes a footnote when it comes to political allies. What was considered unacceptable yesterday is relativized as irrelevant today. And what used to be a red line suddenly becomes a footnote of foreign policy. Perhaps that is the new European realpolitik. Or, put more simply: Better than morality is double standards. But it is probably all just a misunderstanding. Perhaps we misinterpreted the symbolism. Perhaps they were not neo-Nazi symbols after all. Perhaps everything was completely different. Even though the evidence is on the table, this is surely just Russian propaganda and a conspiracy theory, right?  Author: AI-Translation - АИИ | |
|
| Other articles: |
 | We Don't Want to Become Synchronized ZombiesElmar Schwenke / Peter Lemar ist Autor, Journalist und Musiker. Er spricht über seine Erfahrungen insbesondere in den Jahren der P(l)andemie und wohin die Reise gehen könnte / wi... zum Artikel |
 | Did a Mother in Zeitz Kill Her Newborn? A Forensics Expert Solves the Case!What if someone is acquitted – not by a confession, not by a witness, but by a piece of lung in a glass of water?... zum Artikel |
 | Small, Charming Elf Market on December 7, 2024The anticipation for the Christmas season is growing, and what better way to get into the festive spirit than a small, charming Elf Market? On Saturday, December 7, 2024, the forme... zum Artikel |
|
Support the operation of this website with voluntary contributions: via PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/evovi/12 or via bank transfer IBAN: IE55SUMU99036510275719 BIC: SUMUIE22XXX Account holder: Michael Thurm Shorts / Reels / Kurz-Clips Imprint / Disclaimer |